Re: [Ledger-smb-users] upgrades and database integrity.

2010-01-11 Thread Luke
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010, Stroller wrote: > Ok, using the workflow I described before, the select box is unticked > by default. Right. Enter a customer, hit update. One or more invoices appear, with their boxes unticked. > I guess I started out with LedgerSMB (or SQL-Ledger) by choosing a > cus

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] upgrades and database integrity.

2010-01-11 Thread Stroller
On 11 Jan 2010, at 21:50, Luke wrote: >> ... >> It's very easy in this step to accidentally post a new invoice (to >> the >> same customer) with a negative amount, leaving the original open and >> unpaid. I think this comes from having amounts filled in but the >> select box unticked. > > How wo

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] upgrades and database integrity.

2010-01-11 Thread Luke
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010, Stroller wrote: > > Here is where our methods differ: if you only check the box(es), > > and then > > select "update", the program should fill in the proper amounts. > > > > You may then update further to your heart's content, and finally > > select > > post. > > > > Only

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] upgrades and database integrity.

2010-01-11 Thread Stroller
On 11 Jan 2010, at 06:48, Luke wrote: > ... > Of course I agree that this is what he should be doing, but I have a > different approach to yours, and I am uncertain why you do it as you > describe... > ... >> Enter the amount in BOTH amount fields, and THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT, >> DO >> NOT SKIP T