I think, which is comfortable for you.
RPM upgrade definitely work, but for me, manual upgrade is comfortable
for me.
And do not forget to backup :)
Cheers,
István
2007. 12. 11, kedd keltezéssel 02.42-kor Richard Hernandez ezt írta:
> Thanks for the input. I used an RPM to install so would I
Thanks for the input. I used an RPM to install so would I be able to
use the new RPM to upgrade or should I just replace the files?
Thanks.
Richard
On Dec 10, 2007 8:54 AM, Chris Travers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Dec 9, 2007 12:16 PM, Pongracz Istvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
On Dec 9, 2007 12:16 PM, Pongracz Istvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007. 12. 9, vasárnap keltezéssel 11.51-kor Richard Hernandez ezt írta:
> > Would upgrading involve just backing up ledgersmb.conf and doing an
> > rpm -Uvh? I didn't see anything on your website.
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> AFAIK you shou
2007. 12. 9, vasárnap keltezéssel 11.51-kor Richard Hernandez ezt írta:
> Would upgrading involve just backing up ledgersmb.conf and doing an
> rpm -Uvh? I didn't see anything on your website.
>
Hi,
AFAIK you should simply overwrite all files, except the configuration
files.
In the 1.2.x, the d
Would upgrading involve just backing up ledgersmb.conf and doing an
rpm -Uvh? I didn't see anything on your website.
Thanks.
Richard
On Dec 7, 2007 3:06 PM, Christopher Murtagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The LedgerSMB team is pleased to announce the release of LedgerSMB 1.2.10.
> This rele
The LedgerSMB team is pleased to announce the release of LedgerSMB 1.2.10.
This release notice, as well as a link to the SourceForge download is on our
website here:
http://ledgersmb.org/node/57
Changelog for 1.2.10
* Fixed bug 1765161, post button duplicates invoices.(Chris T)
* Adding a mino
