On Jan 29, 2008 8:25 PM, Jeff Kowalczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 19:14:46 -0800, Richard Hernandez wrote:
> > Actually (Vtiger) is selling it as a complete package. Vtiger has the
> > quote, price list, orders, etc. sections already there. Maybe this may
> > be an easier pa
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 19:14:46 -0800, Richard Hernandez wrote:
> Actually (Vtiger) is selling it as a complete package. Vtiger has the
> quote, price list, orders, etc. sections already there. Maybe this may
> be an easier path.
I was thinking of Vtiger when this thread started. When last I looked i
On Jan 27, 2008 3:01 PM, William Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > Chris Travers wrote:
> >
> >> H.. I guess I would scale back that promise a little :-)
> >>
> >> Most of the time when people speak of CRM they mean:
> >>
> >> 1) Contact management plus cate
Well I think the point in integrating the two was so you can share
information instead of having to enter it multiple time. For example
having to type a customers information once in LegerSMB and then again
in whatever you use as a CRM not only introduces more chances of typos
but also isn't very
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Chris Travers wrote:
> On Jan 29, 2008 8:39 AM, Paul Wrightson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Both of the examples cited here are specific-ish customizations for
> > specific-ish businesses. What I mean be "specific-ish" is that the
> > functionality does not apply to the m
On Jan 29, 2008 8:39 AM, Paul Wrightson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Both of the examples cited here are specific-ish customizations for
> specific-ish businesses. What I mean be "specific-ish" is that the
> functionality does not apply to the majority of businesses, nor just a
> single business,
Both of the examples cited here are specific-ish customizations for
specific-ish businesses. What I mean be "specific-ish" is that the
functionality does not apply to the majority of businesses, nor just a
single business, but a sub-set of all businesses.
What I believe we need is a framework t
beamends wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 19:00 -0500, Luke wrote:
>> On Sun, 27 Jan 2008, beamends wrote:
>>
>>> Whist appreciating that we all have our different requirements, I'd much
>>> rather that accounts/stock control was 100% before adding features that
>>> fall outside the current system.
On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 19:00 -0500, Luke wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Jan 2008, beamends wrote:
>
> > Whist appreciating that we all have our different requirements, I'd much
> > rather that accounts/stock control was 100% before adding features that
> > fall outside the current system. Obviously I'm totall
Pongracz Istvan wrote:
> 2008. 01. 27, vasárnap keltezéssel 20.28-kor Stroller ezt írta:
> ..
>
>> free & open-source - in the near future. Unless you're planning an
>> "Exchange killer" then I find appointment tracking to be an
>> undesirable feature in Ledger SMB.
>>
>
>
>> Str
On Sun, 27 Jan 2008, beamends wrote:
> Whist appreciating that we all have our different requirements, I'd much
> rather that accounts/stock control was 100% before adding features that
> fall outside the current system. Obviously I'm totally biased as that
> what I'm using it for (i.e retailing)!
On Sun, 27 Jan 2008, Stroller wrote:
> >> 3) Task tracking (i.e. sales opportunities, etc)
> >> 4) Appointment Tracking
> >>
> >> 1.3 will do the first two quite well. It will not do everything that
> >> people want from a "complete" CRM without some additional
> >> extensions to
> >> the dat
Quoting beamends <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Whist appreciating that we all have our different requirements, I'd much
> rather that accounts/stock control was 100% before adding features that
> fall outside the current system. Obviously I'm totally biased as that
> what I'm using it for (i.e retailing)!
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Chris Travers wrote:
>
>> H.. I guess I would scale back that promise a little :-)
>>
>> Most of the time when people speak of CRM they mean:
>>
>> 1) Contact management plus categorization
>> 2) Comment tracking
>> 3) Task tracking (i.e. sales opportunities, e
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 01:14 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Quoting Pongracz Istvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Personally I use eGroupWare as a possible "Exchange killer" and I had an
> > idea to make an interface between them.
> >
> > For example:
> > Payment/delivery time into calendar.
> > Conta
Quoting Pongracz Istvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Personally I use eGroupWare as a possible "Exchange killer" and I had an
> idea to make an interface between them.
>
> For example:
> Payment/delivery time into calendar.
> Contacts.
> Project integration.
> Whatever.
>
I've been looking at eGroupWare
2008. 01. 27, vasárnap keltezéssel 20.28-kor Stroller ezt írta:
..
> free & open-source - in the near future. Unless you're planning an
> "Exchange killer" then I find appointment tracking to be an
> undesirable feature in Ledger SMB.
> Stroller.
>
Hi,
Personally I use eGroupWare as a
On 27 Jan 2008, at 18:32, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Chris Travers wrote:
>
>> H.. I guess I would scale back that promise a little :-)
>>
>> Most of the time when people speak of CRM they mean:
>>
>> 1) Contact management plus categorization
>> 2) Comment tracking
>> 3) Task tracking (i
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> 1) Contact management plus categorization
>> 2) Comment tracking
>> 3) Task tracking (i.e. sales opportunities, etc)
>> 4) Appointment Tracking
>
> Well I can easily add the data structure for three and four.
+1 then, if it isn't too late to flesh out this brand-new
Chris Travers wrote:
> H.. I guess I would scale back that promise a little :-)
>
> Most of the time when people speak of CRM they mean:
>
> 1) Contact management plus categorization
> 2) Comment tracking
> 3) Task tracking (i.e. sales opportunities, etc)
> 4) Appointment Tracking
>
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:38:04 -0500 (EST)
> Luke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I went to the RoadMap to see if there was any mention of implementing
> > some of the latest SL features which don't yet exist in Ledgersmb
> > (bank account specificatio
On Jan 25, 2008 7:04 PM, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:38:04 -0500 (EST)
> Luke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This may be more appropriate for the devel list, but not sure, so
> > I'll ask it here and be a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:38:04 -0500 (EST)
Luke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This may be more appropriate for the devel list, but not sure, so
> I'll ask it here and be annoying.
>
> I went to the RoadMap to see if there was any mention of implementing
This may be more appropriate for the devel list, but not sure, so I'll ask
it here and be annoying.
I went to the RoadMap to see if there was any mention of implementing some
of the latest SL features which don't yet exist in Ledgersmb (bank account
specifications; dropdown for payment method;
24 matches
Mail list logo
