Re: [Ledger-smb-users] workflow broken in 1.3

2012-04-10 Thread Chris Travers
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Håvard Sørli wrote: > On 10. april 2012 16:38, Michael Richardson wrote: > >> There are other things which one would like recurring transactions for, >> just as phone bills, where independant of FX rates, the amount varies >> every month. >> >> My workflow is now

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] workflow broken in 1.3

2012-04-10 Thread Håvard Sørli
On 10. april 2012 16:38, Michael Richardson wrote: > There are other things which one would like recurring transactions for, > just as phone bills, where independant of FX rates, the amount varies > every month. > > My workflow is now to just pull up the previous months transactions in > Chart-of-

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] workflow broken in 1.3

2012-04-10 Thread Michael Richardson
> "Håvard" == Håvard Sørli writes: >>> I understand where that's coming from. I need to think about a >>> good solution that would suit both you and an auditor to propose >>> to you. Let me sleep on it a bit. >>> >>> Isn't the true problem here though that you can't ente

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] workflow broken in 1.3

2012-04-10 Thread Chris Travers
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Håvard Sørli wrote: > On 09. april 2012 22:53, John Locke wrote: >>> I understand where that's coming from. I need to think about a good >>> solution that would suit both you and an auditor to propose to you. >>> Let me sleep on it a bit. >>> >>> Isn't the true pro

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] workflow broken in 1.3

2012-04-10 Thread Håvard Sørli
On 09. april 2012 22:53, John Locke wrote: >> I understand where that's coming from. I need to think about a good >> solution that would suit both you and an auditor to propose to you. >> Let me sleep on it a bit. >> >> Isn't the true problem here though that you can't enter the >> transaction in a

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] workflow broken in 1.3

2012-04-09 Thread John Locke
Hi, Erik, Michael, On 04/09/2012 12:49 PM, Erik Huelsmann wrote: On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 6:58 PM, John Locke > wrote: We run into this as well. I'm not sure exactly what makes AP transactions end up in the Draft Approval screen, while AR transactions get

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] workflow broken in 1.3

2012-04-09 Thread Erik Huelsmann
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 6:58 PM, John Locke wrote: > We run into this as well. > > I'm not sure exactly what makes AP transactions end up in the Draft > Approval screen, while AR transactions get posted immediately, but > that's probably the most useful solution that's not far from being > workabl

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] workflow broken in 1.3

2012-04-09 Thread John Locke
We run into this as well. I'm not sure exactly what makes AP transactions end up in the Draft Approval screen, while AR transactions get posted immediately, but that's probably the most useful solution that's not far from being workable -- making recurring AR invoices and transactions not post

[Ledger-smb-users] workflow broken in 1.3

2012-04-09 Thread Michael Richardson
First, thank you for the FX current fixes in 1.3.14. It's not enough to solve the problems with my bank account and credit card reconcilliation starting amounts to match 1.2.x, however. The real problem I'm having is with my credit card workflow. I have a number of transactions which are recurri