Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Installing 1.3

2012-10-17 Thread Richard
On 17/10/12 16:59, Kevin Bailey wrote: On 17/10/12 13:58, lrspare...@aol.com wrote: Hi,I'm having a bit of a nightmare here! My old 1.2based system has suffered a hard drive problem- but no panic,I've got a back up Only I'm having some trouble installing 1.3 on Ubuntu 12.04LTS. Having

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Installing 1.3

2012-10-17 Thread Kevin Bailey
On 17/10/12 13:58, lrspare...@aol.com wrote: Hi,I'm having a bit of a nightmare here! My old 1.2based system has suffered a hard drive problem- but no panic,I've got a back up Only I'm having some trouble installing 1.3 on Ubuntu 12.04LTS. Having found that LSMB is not in the repositry,I

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Installing 1.3

2012-10-17 Thread Robert James Clay
On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 08:58 -0400, lrspares45 wrote: > Only I'm having some trouble installing 1.3 on Ubuntu 12.04LTS. > > Having found that LSMB is not in the repositry, I finally manged to > install it via the Ubuntu Software centre - so far so good. IIRC, that would be the LSMB 1.3.18-

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Installing 1.3 on Redhat or Fedora systems?

2012-02-21 Thread Philip Rhoades
Hilton, On 2012-02-22 10:33, Hilton Day wrote: > Hi Phil, > > Sure an extra pair of eyes might prove handy. I'm not sure how the > repo packages translate to Fedora however - the repo I'm using is > RHEL-specific. > > I spent some time last night going through the list of perl module > dependenc

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Installing 1.3 on Redhat or Fedora systems?

2012-02-21 Thread Hilton Day
Hi Phil, Sure an extra pair of eyes might prove handy. I'm not sure how the repo packages translate to Fedora however - the repo I'm using is RHEL-specific. I spent some time last night going through the list of perl module dependencies in in the ledgersmb INSTALL file - its possible to identif

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Installing 1.3 on Redhat or Fedora systems?

2012-02-21 Thread Philip Rhoades
Hilton, On 2012-02-22 01:08, Hilton Day wrote: >> I have been routinely testing new releases of v1.3 as they become >> available on a clean install of Fedora 16 virtual system.  While it >> is >> gradually improving and getting closer to be usable I don't think it >> is >> there yet.  After rec

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Installing 1.3 on Redhat or Fedora systems?

2012-02-21 Thread Hilton Day
> I have been routinely testing new releases of v1.3 as they become > available on a clean install of Fedora 16 virtual system.  While it is > gradually improving and getting closer to be usable I don't think it is > there yet.  After recent discussions with Chris on this topic, I have > decided to

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Installing 1.3 on Redhat or Fedora systems?

2012-02-21 Thread Philip Rhoades
Hilton, On 2012-02-21 22:59, Håvard Sørli wrote: > On 21. feb. 2012 11:22, Hilton Day wrote: > >> 1. Which RPM-based distribution is the RPM for? Ideally, a version >> and > You my take a look at this discussions: > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.finance.ledger.smb.devel/3416 > http://p

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Installing 1.3 on Redhat or Fedora systems?

2012-02-21 Thread Håvard Sørli
On 21. feb. 2012 11:22, Hilton Day wrote: > 1. Which RPM-based distribution is the RPM for? Ideally, a version and You my take a look at this discussions: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.finance.ledger.smb.devel/3416 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.finance.ledger.smb.devel/3360 and

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Installing 1.3

2010-02-17 Thread Chris Travers
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Armaghan Saqib wrote: > > Two minor improvements might be: > > 1. Do not prefix script names with '/path/to/ledgersmb13/' once we are > inside this folder with last cd. Applied. > > 2. Change sql/modules/LOADORDER to a script. The LOADORDER is used by at least o

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Installing 1.3

2010-02-17 Thread Armaghan Saqib
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Chris Travers wrote: > I am actually restructuring the installation documentation for beta 4 > and your feedback is helpful. > > The main changes are: > 1)  Rewriting the manual db installation instructions and breaking it > off into a separate document so that aut

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Installing 1.3

2010-02-17 Thread Chris Travers
Hi Armaghan; I am actually restructuring the installation documentation for beta 4 and your feedback is helpful. The main changes are: 1) Rewriting the manual db installation instructions and breaking it off into a separate document so that automated installation processes are more prominent and

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Installing 1.3

2010-02-17 Thread Armaghan Saqib
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:52 AM, Chris Travers wrote: > Note that creates the Pg user as well,  but does not assign roles.  If > you want to assign roles, you have to either grant them separately or > use select admin__add_user_to_role(username, rolname); > > lsmb13=# \df admin__add_user_to_role

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Installing 1.3

2010-02-14 Thread Chris Travers
Note that creates the Pg user as well, but does not assign roles. If you want to assign roles, you have to either grant them separately or use select admin__add_user_to_role(username, rolname); lsmb13=# \df admin__add_user_to_role List of functions Schema

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Installing 1.3

2010-02-14 Thread Chris Travers
There's a better way than inserting into the tables directly. select person__save(NULL, 3, 'Chris', 'R', 'Travers', 232); The second argument is the salutation id. lsmb13=# select * from salutation; id | salutation + 1 | Dr. 2 | Miss. 3 | Mr. 4 | Mrs. 5 | Ms. 6 | Sir

Re: [Ledger-smb-users] Installing 1.3

2010-02-14 Thread Erick Tyack
Hello Armaghan, I ran into the same problem this morning. This is not a fix, but changing entity_id to 1 allowed me to add a user into the person table: psql -U postgres -d mycompany -t -c "INSERT INTO person (entity_id, first_name, last_name, created) VALUES (1, 'Firstname', 'Lastname', NOW())