On Jan 29, 2008 8:25 PM, Jeff Kowalczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 19:14:46 -0800, Richard Hernandez wrote:
> > Actually (Vtiger) is selling it as a complete package. Vtiger has the
> > quote, price list, orders, etc. sections already there. Maybe this may
> > be an easier pa
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 19:14:46 -0800, Richard Hernandez wrote:
> Actually (Vtiger) is selling it as a complete package. Vtiger has the
> quote, price list, orders, etc. sections already there. Maybe this may
> be an easier path.
I was thinking of Vtiger when this thread started. When last I looked i
On Jan 27, 2008 3:01 PM, William Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > Chris Travers wrote:
> >
> >> H.. I guess I would scale back that promise a little :-)
> >>
> >> Most of the time when people speak of CRM they mean:
> >>
> >> 1) Contact management plus cate
Well I think the point in integrating the two was so you can share
information instead of having to enter it multiple time. For example
having to type a customers information once in LegerSMB and then again
in whatever you use as a CRM not only introduces more chances of typos
but also isn't very
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Chris Travers wrote:
> On Jan 29, 2008 8:39 AM, Paul Wrightson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Both of the examples cited here are specific-ish customizations for
> > specific-ish businesses. What I mean be "specific-ish" is that the
> > functionality does not apply to the m
On Jan 29, 2008 8:39 AM, Paul Wrightson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Both of the examples cited here are specific-ish customizations for
> specific-ish businesses. What I mean be "specific-ish" is that the
> functionality does not apply to the majority of businesses, nor just a
> single business,
Both of the examples cited here are specific-ish customizations for
specific-ish businesses. What I mean be "specific-ish" is that the
functionality does not apply to the majority of businesses, nor just a
single business, but a sub-set of all businesses.
What I believe we need is a framework t
beamends wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 19:00 -0500, Luke wrote:
>> On Sun, 27 Jan 2008, beamends wrote:
>>
>>> Whist appreciating that we all have our different requirements, I'd much
>>> rather that accounts/stock control was 100% before adding features that
>>> fall outside the current system.
On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 19:00 -0500, Luke wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Jan 2008, beamends wrote:
>
> > Whist appreciating that we all have our different requirements, I'd much
> > rather that accounts/stock control was 100% before adding features that
> > fall outside the current system. Obviously I'm totall
Pongracz Istvan wrote:
> 2008. 01. 27, vasárnap keltezéssel 20.28-kor Stroller ezt írta:
> ..
>
>> free & open-source - in the near future. Unless you're planning an
>> "Exchange killer" then I find appointment tracking to be an
>> undesirable feature in Ledger SMB.
>>
>
>
>> Str
On Sun, 27 Jan 2008, beamends wrote:
> Whist appreciating that we all have our different requirements, I'd much
> rather that accounts/stock control was 100% before adding features that
> fall outside the current system. Obviously I'm totally biased as that
> what I'm using it for (i.e retailing)!
On Sun, 27 Jan 2008, Stroller wrote:
> >> 3) Task tracking (i.e. sales opportunities, etc)
> >> 4) Appointment Tracking
> >>
> >> 1.3 will do the first two quite well. It will not do everything that
> >> people want from a "complete" CRM without some additional
> >> extensions to
> >> the dat
Quoting beamends <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Whist appreciating that we all have our different requirements, I'd much
> rather that accounts/stock control was 100% before adding features that
> fall outside the current system. Obviously I'm totally biased as that
> what I'm using it for (i.e retailing)!
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Chris Travers wrote:
>
>> H.. I guess I would scale back that promise a little :-)
>>
>> Most of the time when people speak of CRM they mean:
>>
>> 1) Contact management plus categorization
>> 2) Comment tracking
>> 3) Task tracking (i.e. sales opportunities, e
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 01:14 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Quoting Pongracz Istvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Personally I use eGroupWare as a possible "Exchange killer" and I had an
> > idea to make an interface between them.
> >
> > For example:
> > Payment/delivery time into calendar.
> > Conta
Quoting Pongracz Istvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Personally I use eGroupWare as a possible "Exchange killer" and I had an
> idea to make an interface between them.
>
> For example:
> Payment/delivery time into calendar.
> Contacts.
> Project integration.
> Whatever.
>
I've been looking at eGroupWare
2008. 01. 27, vasárnap keltezéssel 20.28-kor Stroller ezt írta:
..
> free & open-source - in the near future. Unless you're planning an
> "Exchange killer" then I find appointment tracking to be an
> undesirable feature in Ledger SMB.
> Stroller.
>
Hi,
Personally I use eGroupWare as a
On 27 Jan 2008, at 18:32, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Chris Travers wrote:
>
>> H.. I guess I would scale back that promise a little :-)
>>
>> Most of the time when people speak of CRM they mean:
>>
>> 1) Contact management plus categorization
>> 2) Comment tracking
>> 3) Task tracking (i
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> 1) Contact management plus categorization
>> 2) Comment tracking
>> 3) Task tracking (i.e. sales opportunities, etc)
>> 4) Appointment Tracking
>
> Well I can easily add the data structure for three and four.
+1 then, if it isn't too late to flesh out this brand-new
Chris Travers wrote:
> H.. I guess I would scale back that promise a little :-)
>
> Most of the time when people speak of CRM they mean:
>
> 1) Contact management plus categorization
> 2) Comment tracking
> 3) Task tracking (i.e. sales opportunities, etc)
> 4) Appointment Tracking
>
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:38:04 -0500 (EST)
> Luke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I went to the RoadMap to see if there was any mention of implementing
> > some of the latest SL features which don't yet exist in Ledgersmb
> > (bank account specificatio
On Jan 25, 2008 7:04 PM, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:38:04 -0500 (EST)
> Luke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This may be more appropriate for the devel list, but not sure, so
> > I'll ask it here and be a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:38:04 -0500 (EST)
Luke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This may be more appropriate for the devel list, but not sure, so
> I'll ask it here and be annoying.
>
> I went to the RoadMap to see if there was any mention of implementing
23 matches
Mail list logo
