Re: [LU] Don't care about Monkfish

100 % in agreement Damianas you say, something connected with our club we can be proud of at last. One great response to the Manc bombing is to chip away at the edifices of religion. On 27 May 2017 05:20, "Damian Walsh" wrote: > And why should we when Eunan O'Kane is

[LU] Don't care about Monkfish

And why should we when Eunan O'Kane is going to court to establish his right to a humanist wedding. This is one we can all get behind - we can put all the years of hurt since Woodgate & Bowyer behind us and we can proudly say "We are Leeds, give us justice!" Win this one and we can smell the

Re: [LU] Monk resigned

My take on it is this: Monk was offered the one year contract. His agent wanted longer. Why? Because if Monk got the bum's rush (this is Leeds United remember) a longer contract means a bigger settlement. End of. Betty Sent from the North

Re: [LU] Monk resigned

Just said on talksport that it was a little odd as we promised him the contract and squad budget he asked for. Suspect it's palace as he does fancy himself as a premier league manager Can see the criticism of Taylor and don't think it's quite the same. Taylor refused to play. He just walked