Re: [LU] "expensive stunt"?

2016-02-15 Thread Rick Duniec (@ntl)
- Original Message - On 15 February 2016 at 22:04, Dr Michael Benjamin wrote: But let's blame Krasner - why not add Silver too? Because the Kransortium sold to Bates when Redrow Norman was sat in a solicitors office waiting to seal the deal. Why? Because Bates

Re: [LU] "expensive stunt"?

2016-02-15 Thread Ben Thorpe
Oh shut up you tw*t -Original Message- From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Dr Michael Benjamin Sent: 15 February 2016 22:04 To: {broken-address} Nicholas Armit Cc: leedslist Subject: Re: [LU] "expensive stunt"? You are comple

Re: [LU] "expensive stunt"?

2016-02-15 Thread Dr Michael Benjamin
You are completely wrong. Look at the monies he has made by selling and then compare with the lunatic buys he made. Most of the money is going to GFH - because Cellino doesn't do DD & the money haemorrhaged on dud but still paid watermelons. We are probably spending more on lawyers than the cunt

Re: [LU] "expensive stunt"?

2016-02-15 Thread {broken-address} Nicholas Armit
Totally agree Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 15, 2016, at 3:33 PM, Richard Walker wrote: > > I just don't get it ? We never put that much effort into protesting when > Krasner and those cunts from GFH were fleecing the club. > Who is Cellino fleecing ? Himself ? Ok

Re: [LU] "expensive stunt"?

2016-02-15 Thread {broken-address} Nicholas Armit
They are 2nd? Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 15, 2016, at 4:39 PM, Ian Murray wrote: > > Could have won that. Good saves from their keeper x > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On 16 Feb 2016, at 08:14, Richard Walker wrote: >> >> Oh no, not

Re: [LU] "expensive stunt"?

2016-02-15 Thread Ian Murray
Could have won that. Good saves from their keeper x Sent from my iPhone > On 16 Feb 2016, at 08:14, Richard Walker wrote: > > Oh no, not fucking Ted Nugent! > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On 15 Feb 2016, at 20:49, Matt Anderson wrote: >> >>

Re: [LU] "expensive stunt"?

2016-02-15 Thread Richard Walker
Oh no, not fucking Ted Nugent! Sent from my iPhone > On 15 Feb 2016, at 20:49, Matt Anderson wrote: > > What's the real alternative to cellino??? Who can and will buy him out? And > most importantly can do any better?? > > Boro paid £9m for Rhodes, Wednesday bid for

Re: [LU] "expensive stunt"?

2016-02-15 Thread Matt Anderson
What's the real alternative to cellino??? Who can and will buy him out? And most importantly can do any better?? Boro paid £9m for Rhodes, Wednesday bid for him too. Burnley spent £9m on a player Fulham £11m on McCormack No point some penniless fan taking us over and treading water or

Re: [LU] "expensive stunt"?

2016-02-15 Thread Richard Walker
I just don't get it ? We never put that much effort into protesting when Krasner and those cunts from GFH were fleecing the club. Who is Cellino fleecing ? Himself ? Ok he's a cunt but he put millions up to buy fucking Chris Wood. You'd be pissed off. Stop fucking moaning and get on with it.

Re: [LU] "expensive stunt"?

2016-02-15 Thread Steve Gillen
Tennis Balls? When did you become Henry V? :-) On 15 February 2016 at 11:48, Andy Clayton wrote: That's an awful lot of tennis balls. Sent from my iPhone > > > On 15 Feb 2016, at 11:34, Ted wrote: > > > >> On 15 February 2016 Nick wrote: > >>

Re: [LU] "expensive stunt"?

2016-02-15 Thread {broken-address} Graham White
Unless it's in the sky rather than on Sky!? Graham White On Monday, 15 February 2016, 16:18, Andy Clayton wrote: According to someone on the NY Whites Facebook page, those in the stadium will see it too, so that would appear to rule out a

Re: [LU] "expensive stunt"?

2016-02-15 Thread Andy Clayton
According to someone on the NY Whites Facebook page, those in the stadium will see it too, so that would appear to rule out a sky advert. Andy C Sent from my iPhone > On 15 Feb 2016, at 14:49, bruvvalee...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: > > Don't forget Roque Jnr! As stunts go, he's up there with the

Re: [LU] "expensive stunt"?

2016-02-15 Thread bruvvaleeluv
Don't forget Roque Jnr! As stunts go, he's up there with the biggest of them! Sent from my iPad > On 15 Feb 2016, at 11:23, - - wrote: > > anyone any idea what this is all about? > > [1]http://www.thescratchingshed.com/2016/02/expensive-stunt-planned-for >

Re: [LU] "expensive stunt"?

2016-02-15 Thread Ted
> > > > On 15 February 2016 at 11:48, Andy wrote: > >> That's an awful lot of tennis balls. >> > Apparently it won't effect (affect?) the game so it won't be that. Latest on Twitter (not sure how true) is that LUFC are trying to get anti-Cellino twitter accounts shut-down! Can't see it myself.

Re: [LU] "expensive stunt"?

2016-02-15 Thread Simon Hart
How much does it cost for a 30 second advert on Sky? On 15 February 2016 at 11:48, Andy Clayton wrote: > That's an awful lot of tennis balls. > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On 15 Feb 2016, at 11:34, Ted wrote: > > > >> On 15 February 2016 Nick

Re: [LU] "expensive stunt"?

2016-02-15 Thread Andy Clayton
That's an awful lot of tennis balls. Sent from my iPhone > On 15 Feb 2016, at 11:34, Ted wrote: > >> On 15 February 2016 Nick wrote: >> >> anyone any idea what this is all about? >> >> [1]http://www.thescratchingshed.com/2016/02/expensive-stunt-planned-for >>

Re: [LU] "expensive stunt"?

2016-02-15 Thread Ted
On 15 February 2016 Nick wrote: >anyone any idea what this is all about? > >[1]http://www.thescratchingshed.com/2016/02/expensive-stunt-planned-for >-middlesbrough-game/ > > A few on Waccoe have organised it. They asked "us" to chip-in and trust them to deliver without disclosing

[LU] "expensive stunt"?

2016-02-15 Thread - -
anyone any idea what this is all about? [1]http://www.thescratchingshed.com/2016/02/expensive-stunt-planned-for -middlesbrough-game/ The last expensive stunt I remember was called Brolin... References 1.