Re: [LU] Big Incentive?

2017-01-10 Thread Kevin Lewis (UK SBS)
Some pretty dire performances although most players improved in the 2nd half. After that should not get in the starting team v Derby. But I guess he offers more versatility from the bench than Antonnson IMO Mowatt showed for the first time in a while that he is a good player last night. Only

Re: [LU] Big Incentive?

2017-01-10 Thread Damian Walsh
No it was indeed 6. Shame, another illustration that nostalgia isn't what it used to be :) Damian On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:00 PM, Damian Walsh wrote: > Wasn't it 8? > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 9:24 PM, Rick Duniec (@ntl) > wrote: > >> 1-0 but at

Re: [LU] Big Incentive?

2017-01-09 Thread Damian Walsh
;> > >> AFC Wimbledon - one of the few league teams we've never played? > >> > >> Will I be able to get a ticket for either > >> > >> ttfn > >> > >> Richard > >> > >> -----Original Message- > >> From: Leedsli

Re: [LU] Big Incentive?

2017-01-09 Thread {broken-address} Richard Walker
@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of >> {broken-address} Nicholas Armit >> Sent: 09 January 2017 19:24 >> To: Leeds List <leedslist@gn.apc.org> >> Subject: [LU] Big Incentive? >> >> AFC WIMBLEDON OR SUTTON UTD V CAMBRIDGE UTD OR LEEDS UTD >> __

Re: [LU] Big Incentive?

2017-01-09 Thread Damian Walsh
Wasn't it 8? On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 9:24 PM, Rick Duniec (@ntl) wrote: > 1-0 but at Selhurst Park not Plough Lane. > Sutton was away and Clarkie hit a few in. 6-0 ? > > Haven't we played Sutton in the cup before? I know we played Wimbledon. I >> believe Lorimer missed a

Re: [LU] Big Incentive?

2017-01-09 Thread Rick Duniec (@ntl)
1-0 but at Selhurst Park not Plough Lane. Sutton was away and Clarkie hit a few in. 6-0 ? Haven't we played Sutton in the cup before? I know we played Wimbledon. I believe Lorimer missed a penalty at Elland Road and we scraped a win at Plough lane?

Re: [LU] Big Incentive?

2017-01-09 Thread {broken-address} Richard Walker
icholas Armit > Sent: 09 January 2017 19:24 > To: Leeds List <leedslist@gn.apc.org> > Subject: [LU] Big Incentive? > > AFC WIMBLEDON OR SUTTON UTD V CAMBRIDGE UTD OR LEEDS UTD > ___ > Leedslist mailing list > Info and options: h

Re: [LU] Big Incentive?

2017-01-09 Thread Richard Naef
} Nicholas Armit Sent: 09 January 2017 19:24 To: Leeds List <leedslist@gn.apc.org> Subject: [LU] Big Incentive? AFC WIMBLEDON OR SUTTON UTD V CAMBRIDGE UTD OR LEEDS UTD ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/m

Re: [LU] Big Incentive?

2017-01-09 Thread {broken-address} Nicholas Armit
oo.com>; Leeds List <leedslist@gn.apc.org> Sent: Monday, January 9, 2017 2:31 PM Subject: Re: [LU] Big Incentive? Cracking little draw. The key is winning without going to replays.   Original Message   From: {broken-address} Nicholas Armit Sent: Monday, 9 January 2017 20:24 To: Leeds L

Re: [LU] Big Incentive?

2017-01-09 Thread davidwoolmer
Cracking little draw. The key is winning without going to replays.   Original Message   From: {broken-address} Nicholas Armit Sent: Monday, 9 January 2017 20:24 To: Leeds List Reply To: Nicholas Armit Subject: [LU] Big Incentive? AFC WIMBLEDON OR SUTTON UTD V CAMBRIDGE UTD OR LEEDS UTD

[LU] Big Incentive?

2017-01-09 Thread {broken-address} Nicholas Armit
AFC WIMBLEDON OR SUTTON UTD V CAMBRIDGE UTD OR LEEDS UTD ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org MARCHING ON TOGETHER