[LU] Monk

Just heard his outburst against pep clotet accusing him of stabbing him in the back. Poor Garry, such a man of outstanding moral fibre! Sent from my iPhone ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options:

Re: [LU] Monk resigned

My take on it is this: Monk was offered the one year contract. His agent wanted longer. Why? Because if Monk got the bum's rush (this is Leeds United remember) a longer contract means a bigger settlement. End of. Betty Sent from the North

Re: [LU] Monk resigned

> From: Leedslist [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Jeremy > Adams > Sent: 26 May 2017 13:16 > To: Rob Heath <rhe...@hkis.edu.hk>; Nigel Sykes <ni...@sykesonline.com> > Cc: Leeds List <leedslist@gn.apc.org> > Subject: Re: [LU] Monk resigned > >

Re: [LU] Monk resigned

Of Rob Heath |Sent: Friday, May 26, 2017 12:11 AM |To: Nigel Sykes <ni...@sykesonline.com> |Cc: Leeds List <leedslist@gn.apc.org> |Subject: Re: [LU] Monk resigned | |Sounds to me like Monk has been badly advised. | |On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Nigel Sykes <ni...@sykesonline.com&g

Re: [LU] Monk resigned

er > Sent: 25 May 2017 19:08 > To: Matt Anderson; Michael Benjamin > Cc: leeds list (leedslist@gn.apc.org) > Subject: Re: [LU] Monk resigned > > Possibly, however let's wait and hear Monk's side of things. I was however > pointing out that if Cellino has been in charge he would have

Re: [LU] Monk resigned

s dog once pissed on > Guzman's roses and Guzman said that Karanka didn't have a mangerial clue. > > > From: Richard Naef > <rich...@triumph-computers.co.uk<mailto:rich...@triumph-computers.co.uk>> > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 12:10:31 PM > To: Jeremy Adams >

Re: [LU] Monk resigned

et> > To: Michael Benjamin <m...@myray.com> > Cc: "leeds list (leedslist@gn.apc.org)" <leedslist@gn.apc.org> > Sent: Thursday, 25 May 2017, 18:51 > Subject: Re: [LU] Monk resigned > > Spot on! Nothing to do with owners. He has a better job to go to.

Re: [LU] Monk resigned

<m...@myray.com>; Richard Naef <rich...@triumph-computers.co.uk>; 'leeds list (leedslist@gn.apc.org)' <leedslist@gn.apc.org> Subject: Re: [LU] Monk resigned I wonder if your attitude would have been the same if Cellino was in charge ?

Re: [LU] Monk resigned

) -Original Message- From: Leedslist [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of {broken-address} Richard Walker Sent: 25 May 2017 19:08 To: Matt Anderson; Michael Benjamin Cc: leeds list (leedslist@gn.apc.org) Subject: Re: [LU] Monk resigned Possibly, however let's wait and hear Monk's side

Re: [LU] Monk resigned

dslist@gn.apc.org)" <leedslist@gn.apc.org> Sent: Thursday, 25 May 2017, 18:51 Subject: Re: [LU] Monk resigned Spot on! Nothing to do with owners. He has a better job to go to. > On 25 May 2017, at 17:33, Michael Benjamin <m...@myray.com> wrote: > > Sorry he's gone. &

Re: [LU] Monk resigned

Let's not be too upset. We had a manager who made us the 27th club in England. All we need is someone to make us either 22nd or 26th! > On 25 May 2017, at 18:13, Andy Brown wrote: > > It's hard to comment without really knowing what was said or not but we seem > to

Re: [LU] Monk resigned

apc.org] On Behalf Of Richard > |Naef > |Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 7:27 PM > |To: 'leeds list (leedslist@gn.apc.org)' <leedslist@gn.apc.org> > |Subject: Re: [LU] Monk resigned > | > |I hear Steven Evans is still available…. > | > |ttfn > | > |Richard > | > |F

Re: [LU] Monk resigned

ORS PAGE; myRay: Online CBT |-Original Message- |From: Leedslist [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Richard |Naef |Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 7:27 PM |To: 'leeds list (leedslist@gn.apc.org)' <leedslist@gn.apc.org> |Subject: Re: [LU] Monk resigned | |I hear Steven

Re: [LU] Monk resigned

It's hard to comment without really knowing what was said or not but we seem to have a long history of poor competence in negotiations. I think we all agree the main priority was to secure Monk for the next season but to lose him due to being hell bent on not signing a manager for more than a

Re: [LU] Monk resigned

Message- |From: Leedslist [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Richard |Naef |Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 7:27 PM |To: 'leeds list (leedslist@gn.apc.org)' <leedslist@gn.apc.org> |Subject: Re: [LU] Monk resigned | |I hear Steven Evans is still available…. | |ttfn | |Richard |

Re: [LU] Monk resigned

list@gn.apc.org> Subject: Re: [LU] Monk resigned Terry Venables ? From: Richard Naef <rich...@triumph-computers.co.uk<mailto:rich...@triumph-computers.co.uk>> To: Jeremy Adams <jeremyadam...@hotmail.com<mailto:jeremyadam...@hotmail.com>&

Re: [LU] Monk resigned

] Sent: 25 May 2017 17:23 To: Richard Naef <rich...@triumph-computers.co.uk> Cc: 'leeds list (leedslist@gn.apc.org)' <leedslist@gn.apc.org> Subject: Re: [LU] Monk resigned I'd go for Pearson personally. Not exactly inspiring either but it certainly wouldn't be dull. Karanka seems like

Re: [LU] Monk resigned

Terry Venables ? From: Richard Naef <rich...@triumph-computers.co.uk> To: Jeremy Adams <jeremyadam...@hotmail.com> Cc: "'leeds list (leedslist@gn.apc.org)'" <leedslist@gn.apc.org> Sent: Thursday, 25 May 2017, 17:10 Subject: Re: [LU] Monk resigned OK If n

Re: [LU] Monk resigned

ich...@triumph-computers.co.uk> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 12:10:31 PM To: Jeremy Adams Cc: 'leeds list (leedslist@gn.apc.org)' Subject: RE: [LU] Monk resigned OK If not him then who? He did get Boro up and that's what we want, and what other options are there? ttfn Richard -Original M

Re: [LU] Monk resigned

slist@gn.apc.org>; {broken-address} Richard Walker < > richleed...@yahoo.co.uk.is-broken.gn.apc.org> > Subject: Re: [LU] Monk resigned > > Hard to imagine it's anyone other than Karanka, which is depressing. > > > > Jeremy > > > -- next part

Re: [LU] Monk resigned

gt;; N If <mister@gmail.com>; Leeds List <leedslist@gn.apc.org>; {broken-address} Richard Walker <richleed...@yahoo.co.uk.is-broken.gn.apc.org> Subject: Re: [LU] Monk resigned Hard to imagine it's anyone other than Karanka, which is depressing. Jeremy -- next part -

Re: [LU] Monk resigned

ess} Richard Walker Subject: Re: [LU] Monk resigned Is there no end to this madness? Only at Elland Road... Sent from the North ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubs

Re: [LU] Monk resigned

Is there no end to this madness? Only at Elland Road... Sent from the North ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org

Re: [LU] Monk resigned

yes - be careful what you wish for all you Cellino out fuckers  From: N If <mister@gmail.com> To: leedslist <leedslist@gn.apc.org> Sent: Thursday, 25 May 2017, 13:37 Subject: [LU] Monk resigned That's a blow.  :-( ___ Leeds

Re: [LU] Monk resigned

.@aol.com-is-broken.gn.apc.org> > Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org; mister@gmail.com > Sent: Thursday, 25 May 2017, 14:19 > Subject: Re: [LU] Monk resigned > > Palace more likely. > Maverick > > > Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. > Original message

Re: [LU] Monk resigned

.@aol.com-is-broken.gn.apc.org> Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org, mister@gmail.com Subject: Re: [LU] Monk resigned Aresenal? Sent from my iPhone On 25 May 2017, at 13:39, {broken-address} <seanscr...@aol.com-is-broken.gn.apc.org> wrote: Potentially disastrous. How on earth did Radrizzani screw this up

Re: [LU] Monk resigned

From: Paul Tweney <paul.twe...@ntlworld.com> > To: Andy Brown <a...@andybrown.co.uk>; {broken-address} > <seanscr...@aol.com-is-broken.gn.apc.org> > Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org; mister@gmail.com > Sent: Thursday, 25 May 2017, 14:19 > Subject: Re: [LU] Monk resigned >

Re: [LU] Monk resigned

s} <seanscr...@aol.com-is-broken.gn.apc.org> Cc: leedslist@gn.apc.org; mister@gmail.com Sent: Thursday, 25 May 2017, 14:19 Subject: Re: [LU] Monk resigned Palace more likely. Maverick Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. Original message From: Andy Brown <

Re: [LU] Monk resigned

..@gmail.com Subject: Re: [LU] Monk resigned Aresenal? Sent from my iPhone > On 25 May 2017, at 13:39, {broken-address} > <seanscr...@aol.com-is-broken.gn.apc.org> wrote: > > Potentially disastrous. How on earth did Radrizzani screw this up? Have the > bookies suspende

Re: [LU] Monk resigned

Karanka would be awful. Dreadful negative manager   Original Message   From: {broken-address} Sent: Thursday, 25 May 2017 14:40 To: mister@gmail.com; leedslist@gn.apc.org Subject: Re: [LU] Monk resigned Potentially disastrous. How on earth did Radrizzani screw this up? Have the bookies

Re: [LU] Monk resigned

ourselves for another > "transitional" season. > > > Sean > > > > -Original Message- > From: N If <mister@gmail.com> > To: leedslist <leedslist@gn.apc.org> > Sent: Thu, May 25, 2017 8:37 am > Subject: [LU] Monk resigned > > That

Re: [LU] Monk resigned

org> Sent: Thu, May 25, 2017 8:37 am Subject: [LU] Monk resigned That's a blow. :-( ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org

[LU] Monk resigned

That's a blow. :-( ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org MARCHING ON TOGETHER

[LU] Monk gone

Resigned.  Nigel(the Dublin one) ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options:

[LU] Monk and Wagner get fine and ban

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/39106444 Huddersfield Town boss David Wagner has been given a two-match touchline ban and a £6,000 fine after his altercation with Leeds counterpart Garry Monk. Wagner sprinted down the touchline to join his players in celebrating their late winner

Re: [LU] Monk selection dilemma

, February 11, 2017 9:12 AM |To: leedslist@gn.apc.org |Subject: [LU] Monk selection dilemma | |Interesting to see the lineup this aft. | |1. Left back.haven't read that Taylor is fit yet, so this may not be an |issue..but when he is, does he come straight back in? |Berardi was at fault

[LU] Monk selection dilemma

Interesting to see the lineup this aft. 1. Left back.haven't read that Taylor is fit yet, so this may not be an issue..but when he is, does he come straight back in? Berardi was at fault during the buildup to Udders first goal, but thereafter was probably our best defender.

Re: [LU] Monk charged? Outrageous.

<leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org> on behalf of {broken-address} > Richard Walker <richleed...@yahoo.co.uk.is-broken.gn.apc.org> > Sent: 08 February 2017 12:16 > To: Richard Naef; 'leeds list (leedslist@gn.apc.org)' > Subject: Re: [LU] Monk charged? Outrageous. > > I think

Re: [LU] Monk charged? Outrageous.

oun...@gn.apc.org> on behalf of {broken-address} Richard Walker <richleed...@yahoo.co.uk.is-broken.gn.apc.org> Sent: 08 February 2017 12:16 To: Richard Naef; 'leeds list (leedslist@gn.apc.org)' Subject: Re: [LU] Monk charged? Outrageous. I think Monk deserves the ban. He started it. Wagner's

Re: [LU] Monk charged? Outrageous.

'leeds list (leedslist@gn.apc.org)'" <leedslist@gn.apc.org> Sent: Wednesday, 8 February 2017, 10:58 Subject: Re: [LU] Monk charged? Outrageous. Yeah me too, BUT we don't have thousands of cameras pointing at us.  I think it was a mistake in the heat of the moment on his part and he'll get

Re: [LU] Monk charged? Outrageous.

Yeah me too, BUT we don't have thousands of cameras pointing at us. I think it was a mistake in the heat of the moment on his part and he'll get a ban. Good to see HT have banned the lowlife with the flag, although the cheering Neanderthals prancing around it seem to have got off. ttfn

[LU] Monk charged? Outrageous.

If you watch the footage that some Udder made from the stand, you can see that Monk simply strolled casually into Wanger's path as the latter galumphed back up the pitch after his outrageous pitch invasion. Monk made exactly the same move that I make 10 times a day here in Hong Kong when I see

Re: [LU] Monk

He's just taken 100% responsibility on the TV just now, apologised and wouldn't blame pitch or penalty decision etc ttfn Richard -Original Message- From: Leedslist [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Brendan Osborne Sent: 29 January 2017 16:15 To: David Woolmer

Re: [LU] Monk perhaps wasn't properly consulted about Mowatt?

Haha. On Sun, 29 Jan 2017 at 11:37, {broken-address} Richard Walker < richleed...@yahoo.co.uk.is-broken.gn.apc.org> wrote: > I'd be disappointed if Monk wasn't involved in the sale of Mowatt and it > was an MC decision because that would mean MC knows more about football > than GM. > > Sent from

Re: [LU] Monk perhaps wasn't properly consulted about Mowatt?

I'd be disappointed if Monk wasn't involved in the sale of Mowatt and it was an MC decision because that would mean MC knows more about football than GM. Sent from my iPhone > On 28 Jan 2017, at 20:38, Richard Naef > wrote: > > A couple of comments from

Re: [LU] Monk perhaps wasn't properly consulted about Mowatt?

As much as anything he seems irritated by the timing. We've sold Mowatt just before a match he would undoubtedly have started (at Sutton) but without having bought any replacement cover. That clearly negatively affects the squad rotation Monk can do today with a view to Weds match at Blackburn.

Re: [LU] Monk perhaps wasn't properly consulted about Mowatt?

I think you're reading too much into this and forgetting that he's the Head Coach and not the Manager. Just as he's been clear that he's given the club a shopping list, he would have provided his input on who was surplus to requirements. As he has said, he/we can only assume targets identified

Re: [LU] Monk perhaps wasn't properly consulted about Mowatt?

Hmm, yes, hard to read that as something Monk is supportive of? Will be interesting to see if there are any incomers? Sent from my iPad > On 28 Jan 2017, at 20:38, Richard Naef > wrote: > > A couple of comments from Monkfish about the sale of Mowatt, would be

[LU] Monk perhaps wasn't properly consulted about Mowatt?

A couple of comments from Monkfish about the sale of Mowatt, would be worrying for anyone of a pessimistic bent, he wasn't asked about it right at the start and sounds a bit out of the loop, hope it's not Cellino getting involved. When I heard he'd gone, I assumed his cameo on Wednesday was a

[LU] Monk

Hi gang 1st, couldn't put my finger on it, he reminded me of someone, then the penny dropped. He's a cock a too isn't he?? 2nd, my expectations summed up by all I really hope for this season is that he is still our manager by the end of it. If we manage that, we'll have done at least as well as

Re: [LU] Monk out.

Absolute clueless drivel. Losing at home and he subs like for like. Mowett and Phillips were passengers all game, God knows how they stayed on. Wasn't happy with the appointment, 70 odd games managing a Swansea side he inherited? We'd have been better off giving Evans another season. No passion,

Re: [LU] Monk out.

Agree about both the game and monk's interview. The only point you can give him is that their player who scored should have been red carded for a two footed lunge just before half time. We never looked like scoring. I think we created two chances - Wood headed wide from a corner first half and

Re: [LU] Monk out.

It was. Match report later after I've finished downing numerous pints in the grove Sent from my iPhone > On 10 Sep 2016, at 17:28, Matt Anderson wrote: > > Sounded awful > > > > Sent from my iPhone > ___ > Leedslist mailing

[LU] Monk

Was only joking with last email. But just heard monk's interview on radio Leeds. He hasn't got a fucking clue. Having a go at Adam pope for asking the questions we want answers to. I wouldn't be surprised if the axe falls soon. He clearly cannot hack it. Sent from my iPhone

[LU] Monk out.

Sounded awful Sent from my iPhone ___ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org MARCHING ON TOGETHER

Re: [LU] Monk makes a fool of himself

You could say we've had a tough start, with all four teams we've failed to beat being in the top seven, though on the other hand the fact those teams have taken points of Leeds has helped them get up there. Our next two opponents are as far apart as they could be, with Huddersfield being top

Re: [LU] Monk makes a fool of himself

I hope you're right, cos it would mean we are doing well, meaning pushing for a top 6 place. More likely, he will last another 6 or so games and get pushed as we are close to the bottom. Forecast remains the same, 14th and 3 managers. Seen nothing to change my mind yet. Cheers Alec > On 28

Re: [LU] Monk makes a fool of himself

Agreed. Monk has to be given a season ... Or at least half a season. > On 28 Aug 2016, at 09:41, "nat...@sky.com" wrote: > > Talk about stating the obvious - Garry Monk says " If we'd not conceded we > would have beaten Forest" > Remarks like that (and I know what he meant,

[LU] Monk makes a fool of himself

Talk about stating the obvious - Garry Monk says " If we'd not conceded we would have beaten Forest" Remarks like that (and I know what he meant, with the 2 soft goals from corners) will only make him seem daft. I hope he is not under real pressure (he has to get at least till the start of the

[LU] Monk

Very concerned by his interview. Watched a different game to me. Disagreed that we were overrun in midfield Was really off with Adam Pope too. Only asked what we all thought That's more worrying than the performance and result Gone by October I reckon Sent from my iPhone