John Hallam
Friends of the Earth Sydney,
17 Lord street, Newtown, NSW, Australia,
Fax(61)(2)9517-3902 ph (61)(2)9517-3903

[EMAIL PROTECTED]    http://homepages.tig.com.au/~foesyd


Dear people,
The World Heritage Committee last night wimped out completely, failing to
take any notice whatsoever of the repeated strong advice of its advisory
bodies, that Kakadu be listed as 'in Danger'.

It's a disaster both for Kakadu, and for the entire World Heritage
framework, which will now see that al you need to do to avoid an 'in
danger' listing for, say, converting Macha Picchu into a theme park or
driving a freeway through the pyramids, or whatever peice of insanity you
may have in store for earths most precious areas, is an australian-style
lobbying campaign.

The committee has completely failed the moral courage and integrity test.

If you'd like to register your disgust, I suggest faxing Ambassador
Matsuura on +33-1-42-27-50-81.

Sorry this took so long to get out, I've been doing media.

A very big thank you to all who faxed and phoned and sent letters and
lobbied and did all manner of crazy things for this bit of the planet which
sadly will not be protected the way it should be protected.

I'd hoped to send you all a victory thank you but it is not to be.

The Jabiluka campaign however, will continue. And there are some little
bits of silver lining, namely that the Bureau is to keep monitoring Kakadu,
and that Australia is to submit a report in April 2000.

To repeat, a big thank you to all who did things or merely put up with
these things appearing in their email.

John Hallam.

TWO FOE PRESS RELEASES FOLLLOW, THEN PRESS RELEASES FROM TWS.


FOE PRESS RELEASE 12/7/1999

POLITICS TRIUMPHS OVER FACTS AS UNESCO WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE WIMPS OUT
ON IN DANGER LISTING

Science and good sense took a back seat in Paris today as the World
Heritage Committee failed to take the advice of its official advisory
bodies, IUCN, ICOMOS and ICCROM, and decided against an 'In Danger' listing
for Kakadu National Park.

The decision is a disaster for the protection of the World Heritage Values
of Kakadu . It is also a disaster for the entire World Heritage convention,
as the World Heritage Committee and Bureau failed completely to take the
strong and twice repeated advice of the advisory bodies into account, and
decided instead to vote against an in danger listing.

As far as we know, a complete failure of this magnitude, to take the advice
of the advisory bodies into account is unprecedented.

According to FOE nuclear campaigner John Hallam, "This decision is a
disaster not only for Kakadu, but for the entire World Heritage Convention,
which this decision has seriously undermined. It is clear that the
committee simply has not had the courage to stand up to the bullying and
manipulation engaged in by the Australian government."

"Hills so called victory is a tainted one that has cost the Australian
government enormous international goodwill, and has again put us in the
position of an environmental wrecker. Now, what we have wrecked is the
World Heritage Convention. People have a right to expect that if a property
is listed as World Heritage, and certain things happen to it, that it will
be listed as 'in Danger'. Thats the whole point of having a World Heritage
Convention."

"Now, any bizarre and inappropriate development in any place, no matter how
outrageous can be approved, just as long as the country concerned is
prepared to strong-arm and manipulate its way through the committee and the
Bureau."

"Now, not only is Kakadu in danger, but the entire World Heritage
Convention is truly in danger."

Contact: John Hallam, 9517-3903, 9810-2598.



Contact in Australia: Virginia Young 0417-223-280
In Paris:Alec Marr, 0417-229-670.

--

          Leftlink - Australia's Broad Left Mailing List
                           mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        http://www.alexia.net.au/~www/mhutton/index.html

Sponsored by Melbourne's New International Bookshop
Subscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=subscribe%20leftlink
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20leftlink



Reply via email to