Joe,
Am I seeing this right, you added height to the legs, but didn't increase the
slot for the bed? How much wider will the machine be?
-Tim
PS, trim your posts to be nice to the folks using digest mode.
- Original Message -
From: 'joe biunno' via Legacy Ornamental Mills
To:
Joe,As I read Bill's comments - I got to thinking: Months ago you told us your business was essentially making "custom drapery rods". In MY mind, drapery rods are no bigger around than maybe THREE INCHES - MAXIMUM!! Yes - some may be 16 feet LONG - but NOT 16" in diameter.Are you now producing t
Very nice i will be interested to see if the gear linkages will still reach to
fit all the gears when finished
This will really extend the size of work you will be able to do
Bill
From: legacy-ornamental-mills@googlegroups.com
[mailto:legacy-ornamental-mills@googlegroups.com]
Sent: Tuesda
ok, that was just the first salvo...i am expecting quite a bit more...it's
all good though...keep 'em coming!...joe...LOL!
On Monday, January 26, 2015 at 9:22:19 PM UTC-5, Va Oak wrote:
>
> Joe,
>
> After your latest comments about there being no welds on the LOM - I take
> back my comment that
and in the "oops, i didn't think of that" department...did not consider
that enlarging the turning capacity of the machine would also increase the
height of the machine...too embarrassed to say what the height to the "Y"
axis cross rail will be, but rest assured it is up there!...have a few
ide
Joe,After your latest comments about there being no welds on the LOM - I take back my comment that I suspect you used to work there. If you had - LOTS of the Mill would have been welded - you LOVE welding - and do it well! I'll bet you even have welded steel door frames throughout your house - "
Dang Joe! You remind me of the old Memorex commercials: "Is it live? - Or is it Memorex?"Is it Legacy? - or is it "Joe's"? You could convince me that you worked at Legacy - in their fabrication/skunkwerks dept.!VERY nice work Joe! I KNEW you'd have something bigger to show us.Thanks for sharin
recently, as i was disassembling and "playing" with my machine, i noticed
something that never dawned on me before...there seems to be not a single
weld on the legacy whatsoever...i find this to be quite unique for a
machine as complex as this is and a major accomplishment in engineering and
de
also considering a brace/gusset where the cross brace meets the vertical
support...it would be shaped so as not to be in the way of the largest
turning diameter, but be as large as possible...will determine if it is
needed once the modified machine is completely reassembled...joe
On Monday, Jan
Very interesting I have never seen one I wonder if its in the woodchuck manual
I’m looking forward to mike possibly posting it so I can see
Bill
From: legacy-ornamental-mills@googlegroups.com
[mailto:legacy-ornamental-mills@googlegroups.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 27 January 2015 1:37 AM
To: legac
Kroil is a good product. I use it in the liquid form.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Cole Andrews
To: Legacy group
Sent: Sun, Jan 25, 2015 11:47 pm
Subject: Re: Stuck pieces on Mill - does this work?
Loctite makes a product I have used that " freezes" it and then you
separate the
i would say it is a legacy piece as it is made to fit the woodchuck...when
i first got the piece i thought that maybe someone had made it...but now
that i see there are others out there that match it perfectly, i would
guess that it is a legacy piece...wouldn't take much to make longer rollers
Yes that’s the word I was trying to think of featurete i have done quite a few
featuretes my self over the years lolo
Bill
From: legacy-ornamental-mills@googlegroups.com
[mailto:legacy-ornamental-mills@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Roger P
Sent: Tuesday, 27 January 2015 12:52 AM
To: legacy-
I have not seen that before does anyone know if it’s a legacy part or is it
from something else
Or is it a homemade thing. Being long it might be good for spirals the genuine
legacy thin stock support doesn’t work perfectly on coarser single start
barleys a longer support is much better
Bill
Bill
It is a “featurete”, that is the official name!
Regards
Euro Roger
From: Bill Bulkeley
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2015 1:46 PM
To: legacy-ornamental-mills@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: rope and beads
Still looks good, anyway it’s not a mistake it’s a design modification lolo
Here is a pic
Still looks good, anyway it’s not a mistake it’s a design modification lolo
Here is a pic of the bit if anyone wants to see
https://www.magnate.net/v/vspfiles/photos/352-2.jpg
i was always going to again mount like I had pre fire a fly cutter in a drill
mounted in a small drill press mounte
Post some pictures of your parts max some one on here will be able to identify
what they are
And the best way of all to learn is to do, make stuff good or bad post it here
and you will get praised or told what you did incorrect ,remember there are no
failures just fire wood lolo.
That’s the tr
Hi Bill
The first rope beads that I made were done by the hand cranking method, "Talk
about a long rope..." ;-) Using the limit switch is much easer. I used a button
cutting bit from Magnate. (#352) , but did not go the full plung depth. (I did
not relise my mistake until I was more than half
Pretty cool curt if we didn’t have or could not build what you have i guess its
just one turn of the cranking handle for each bead spacing. What cutter did you
use to cut the bead
Bill
From: legacy-ornamental-mills@googlegroups.com
[mailto:legacy-ornamental-mills@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
19 matches
Mail list logo