Re: [LegacyUG] Opening two files to make repairs to data

2006-12-13 Thread RICHARD SCHULTHIES
I have done something similar in error, and found I had three almost identical DB with enough variances to drive me nuts. What I did, was add the three DBs to the same file in this way. They were about 2 each. First, I went to Customize Other in each DB. Under Custom USER ID Numbers, choose Fil

Re: [LegacyUG] Need Help on Legacy Pedigree Report Please

2006-12-13 Thread RICHARD SCHULTHIES
I have never used Genbox, so don't know what the Legacy Pedigree report doesn't have. I just ran the P. report and it did exactly that. You may want to pick 4,5, or 6 generations to a page, but that doesn't seem to be your need. Are you asking how to create a more than 6 generations to a page, or m

Re: [LegacyUG] Standard Usage?

2006-12-13 Thread Kathy Shiell-Stokes
William: The first problem is that I enter the information between TWO brackets or braces...I use the lower case ones to the right of the "p"...so data entry is [[...then the info I want followed by ]] when Legacy sees the [[it treats everything until]]as being private information and...unless

Re: [LegacyUG] Standard Usage?

2006-12-13 Thread WILLIAM HATHAWAY
Sorry - the "solution" only specified single square brackets. If double were meant, it should have been written that way. I tested double square brackets - and that solves the "Possible illegal characters" message in the Potential Problems report - but when I make an Ancestry report, it leave

Re: [LegacyUG] Standard Usage?

2006-12-13 Thread WILLIAM HATHAWAY
Oh - I just find a killer problem with this. For the Potential Problems List, it considers each use of [--?--] to have "Possible illegal character in the Name field" AND it gives me "Too many dashes in the Name field." Apparently what is standard for RootsWeb is considered a Problem in Legac

Re: [LegacyUG] Standard Usage?

2006-12-13 Thread Cathy
The solution has already been given in this thread. Put the actual relationship in double square brackets. If you like the [--?--] enter it as [--?--] [[wife of Joe Blow]] etc I don't like the [--?--] so just put the relevant information in the double square brackets like the original poster. C

Re: [LegacyUG] regarding pictures

2006-12-13 Thread Tish
Thanks to those who answered my plea for help with pictures. I am working on it - not perfected yet - but hopefully it will work soon. I am very grateful for the quick help the members of this list always seem to do. Thanks again, Tish Tish, whilst the technique used is not uncommon, if

Re: [LegacyUG] Standard Usage?

2006-12-13 Thread WILLIAM HATHAWAY
Considering the many helpful suggestions on this topic and this recommendation, I decided to use this format.I have just changed my 129 individuals. I prefer to see a question mark to reading what looks like a "real" name. The Index View does put all the [--?--] at the top of the alphabet

[LegacyUG] Gedcom export when using alternate wording of events

2006-12-13 Thread Susan Daily
I just went and took a look at my WorldConnect tree on Rootsweb.com and was disturbed that all of my event sentence override constructions are appearing, for example: "Event: National Army Military Service 27 May 1918 Toledo, Lucas, Ohio, USA _OVER: [HeShe] enlisted in the [Desc] [onDate] [inPlac

[LegacyUG] Opening two files to make repairs to data

2006-12-13 Thread Shar
Okay, I messed up and changed different items in two saved files. It only involves 90 people. I have so many people in the two files I would rather not merge the files. I used to open a laptop and my desktop PC so I could view and change/add information, but laptop is not available to use. Wo

Re: [LegacyUG] Still a problem with randomly unlinking people.

2006-12-13 Thread Cathy
Hi Roxanne, It sounds to me as if you've picked up a second set of unknown parents - and they are marked as preferred parents. Cathy At 08:27 AM 14/12/2006, you wrote: Jim; That's just it, I haven't deleted any individuals from any of my files. Last night was the first time I had opened my o

Re: [LegacyUG] child of parents, confused

2006-12-13 Thread Cathy
Hi Janis, It's the non-existent third wife you need to get rid of. There are various ways to do this. Go to the husband in family view and click the Spouse icon. Highlight the unknown third wife and delete. Another way, Right click on the husband when the unknown wife is showing and choose to u

Re: [LegacyUG] still problem with relationship calculator

2006-12-13 Thread JRAYMOND651
Ruth Ann, Thank you for illustrating this long-standing issue. Jon Raymond St Paul Park, MN Web site: http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~raymond/ *** Give the gift of Legacy for the holidays! Order online at http://legacyfamilytree.com/Redirect/Store-Legacy.asp or call 1-800-753-3453

[LegacyUG] Need Help on Legacy Pedigree Report Please

2006-12-13 Thread Candi
Good Evening Legacy Family, I need a little help in how to set up a Legacy Pedigree report. I would like it to follow straight through much like Genbox does, whereas it does not go >>> 'number 1 is the same as number 5 on page 1 and so on. I noticed that Genbox can do that and silly me I de

Re: [LegacyUG] Tracking non-relatives

2006-12-13 Thread WILLIAM HATHAWAY
I fully concur with the utility of permitting additional kinds of "relationships" linkages. Mike suggested good examples. In my case, I really started my file when I was asked to determine all the people buried in a family plot - older cousins were trying to "reserve" their place and we foun

[LegacyUG] GeoCode database for Canada

2006-12-13 Thread M. Brenzel
I just purchased Map My Family Tree. I have a number of entries in Canada that appear as incomplete because there is no county in my Legacy database. When I use Geocode, I don't find a county for Canadian locations. Is there an update to Geocode that gives the Canadian counties? Mary *** G

[LegacyUG] child of parents, confused

2006-12-13 Thread Janis Gilmore
I have an individual male with several children, born of two wives. Three of the children are by the first wife, but one of those three somehow was showing up as the son of a third (nonexistent) wife - apparently something that happened during the import from TMG several weeks ago. So I went in

Re: [LegacyUG] still problem with relationship calculator

2006-12-13 Thread Ruth Ann Larson
I have 5.0.0.256 (Version 5). I have a great-great-grandfather who had a son by an unknown (so far, at least) woman. I have not entered any information for the mother. The "relationship calculator" correctly finds this son to be my 1/2 great-granduncle. The "set relationships" does not see

RE: [LegacyUG] Standard Usage?

2006-12-13 Thread Kathy Shiell-Stokes
Ron: Not usually but please understand that what's between the brackets is just for MY information..When printing a report the choices you make for printing kick in so if you want to see --?-- that would be the choice you make Conceivably you might make different choices for different reports.

Re: [LegacyUG] Still a problem with randomly unlinking people.

2006-12-13 Thread Brian/Support
Also check that Legacy has not somehow added an extra set of "Unknown" parents when you see someone who appears to be unlinked. If Legacy thinks there is n\more than one set of parents there will be a number on the Parent Icon under their name in family view. Brian Customer Support Millennia C

Re: [LegacyUG] still problem with relationship calculator

2006-12-13 Thread Richard Van Wasshnova
MessageDonna, Sometimes a refresh of "TOOLS / SET RELATIONSHIPS" is needed. I don't really expect it to work for you since when you gave the unknown a fake name it fixed the relationship until you changed it back to unknown, right? Richard - Original Message - From: Donna Alden-Bug

Re: [LegacyUG] Standard Usage?

2006-12-13 Thread Tracy Skegg
Hi Listers When I don't know the maiden name of women who are married I put in what I've found for main entry's Given Name such as initial etc, and list variations of the married name in AKAs SMITH, Ada Mrs and SMITH, John Mrs. If I have no name at all for the female then I don't put anything in,

Re: [LegacyUG] Error 3043

2006-12-13 Thread Greg Fletcher
Hi Ron, Sherry, If you a Google Search for that error, it would appear that it is a Windows error related to network drive access, or some other (presumable temporary problem) hard drive access issue. Greg - Original Message - From: "Sherry/Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Th

Re: [LegacyUG] Still a problem with randomly unlinking people.

2006-12-13 Thread Roxanne
Jim; That's just it, I haven't deleted any individuals from any of my files. Last night was the first time I had opened my own file in a month, and found I had no parents! Will check out the link you sent; this is the first time I have had a problem like this since downloading my first Legacy p

[LegacyUG] Tracking non-relatives

2006-12-13 Thread MJMethod
Is there a recommended way of tracking various individuals who have either a long-term or momentary relationship? Examples would be servants, clergymen, slaves, etc. For now, I can only see recording various notes and (in some cases) keeping track of separate families which I can "publish"

RE: [LegacyUG] Error 3043

2006-12-13 Thread Sherry/Support
Ron, Who knows? It's one of those errors that is usually self-correcting. Our recommendation for fixing it is to restart the computer Thanks for using Legacy. Sherry Customer Support Millennia Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com We are changing the world of genealogy!

Re: [LegacyUG] Still a problem with randomly unlinking people.

2006-12-13 Thread Jim Terry
Roxanne, When you delete someone from a family file, you run the risk of breaking several family relationships. For example, if you delete a married man as a child, then you also delete him as a husband and a father (if he has children). Most of the time unlinking is best. Please see our tip

[LegacyUG] Still a problem with randomly unlinking people.

2006-12-13 Thread Roxanne
A little while ago, I mentioned about how in my half-sister's file, her gg-grandpa became unlinked to his parents. When looking at his parents in the family view, Milo was listed right along with his siblings, but when I clicked on him, he popped up and his parents disappeared. When I tried to reli

RE: [LegacyUG] Standard Usage?

2006-12-13 Thread Ron Carter
Kathy: I use seven underscores (___) for unknown names, but they print in reports. I think I am going to change to your method. Do you include anything with the [[]]'s? Ron Carter - Original Message - From: "Kathy Shiell-Stokes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, December 1

Re: [LegacyUG] still problem with relationship calculator

2006-12-13 Thread Susan Daily
Donna, Since it works in other cases in your tree, but not specifically for her, why don't you try exporting this little branch to another file and see if the relationships work? Or you could delete your grandmother and her first child and create them all over again, linking them in, and see if th

[LegacyUG] Error 3043

2006-12-13 Thread Ron Carter
Hi, I updated to Version 6.0.0.118 and everything seem to be OK until I went to close the file. I got the following error: Error saving database profile. Error 3043: Disk or network error. I reopened the program and file and then closed it. This time I didn't get the error message. Any idea w

[LegacyUG] Update to Version 5.0

2006-12-13 Thread Brian/Support
For those who still use Legacy 5.0 there is a new update available. If you have Legacy 5.0 Deluxe you can update from withing Legacy by going to Internet > Check for Update. For those using the Standard Version you will have to download the installation program from our Web site here: http://

Re: [LegacyUG] Which report is best?

2006-12-13 Thread Jennie Goodwin
Jon: Maybe you are trying to help him in two separate ways -- show him what data you have gathered on his paternal grandfather's side of his family, and then helping him minimize the subsequent data entry. I'm not an expert on all of the Legacy reports and their comparative pluses and minuses. I

Re: [LegacyUG] Standard Usage?

2006-12-13 Thread Jim Terry
Kathy, I think you solution is not only unique, but it avoids the pitfalls of using Unknown, UNK and so forth, which can create problems in online indexes, etc. Very truthfully, I have seen one instance where an amateur genealogist did not realize that UNK was an abbreviation and actually beli

RE: [LegacyUG] Genealogy Etiquette

2006-12-13 Thread Sherry/Support
I wrote to her off-list. Thanks for using Legacy. Sherry Customer Support Millennia Corporation [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com We are changing the world of genealogy! When replying to this message, please include all previous correspondence. Thanks. -Original Message

Re: [LegacyUG] Genealogy Etiquette

2006-12-13 Thread Dermot McGlone
Dora, This is, IMHO, off topic. See guideline No. 5 from the Legacy User Group Etiquette (http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/Etiquette.asp): 5. Please keep to the topic of Legacy and its add-on programs. Please don't send jokes, advertisements, political messages, religious opinion, etc. This is

Re: [LegacyUG] Genealogy Etiquette

2006-12-13 Thread archives
Apologies. Happy Holidays! -- Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org) *** Give the gift of Legacy for the holidays! Order online at http://legacyfamilytree.com/Redirect/Store-Legacy.asp or call 1-800-753-3453. *** Legacy User Group guidelines can be found at: http://www.LegacyFamilyT

RE: [LegacyUG] Genealogy Etiquette

2006-12-13 Thread Paul C. Abell
Lighten up. I think she has a problem and it doesn't hurt her Legacy "family" to help. However, those replies should be made off list. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jenny M Benson Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 5:17 PM To: LegacyUserG

RE: [LegacyUG] Genealogy Etiquette

2006-12-13 Thread Linda Altman
This is really a topic for another group. For advice from professional genealogist try the APG list (Association of Professional Genealogists) their website is http://www.apgen.org Linda Altman http://www.southerngenealogy.com Southern Genealogy uses Legacy Family Tree! This highly acclaimed genea

Re: [LegacyUG] Stardock

2006-12-13 Thread Dermot McGlone
Walt, You might want to check through the archive for advice on how to send text only messages to the list. Sending attachments and HTML messages (both of which are included in your e-mail) is in breach of the Legacy User Group guidelines, and can annoy many users here, especially those on dial-u

Re: [LegacyUG] Standard Usage?

2006-12-13 Thread Charlotte Jack
For a woman who is married and I only know the first name I enter it as Mrs Ann, Smith. The rest I have just left as unknown, but may change to conform to your suggestion Charlotte Jack - Original Message - From: "Dave Naylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 1

Re: [LegacyUG] Genealogy Etiquette

2006-12-13 Thread Dora Smith
Well, it isn't as off topic as you might think; the use of genealogy software opens the problem of what information should be shared how. Notice that the entire can of worms in this case appears to have been opened by teh creation of a Legacy database for a local historical society; see below.

Re: [LegacyUG] Standard Usage?

2006-12-13 Thread Dora Smith
Unknown, SURNAME - doesn't matter. Yours, Dora Smith Austin, TX [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "WILLIAM HATHAWAY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 7:25 PM Subject: [LegacyUG] Standard Usage? As with almost everyone, I have entries of individuals

Re: [LegacyUG] Standard Usage?

2006-12-13 Thread Dora Smith
I wouldn't use punctuation or nonletter characters for the unknown name because when you import it into a different genealogy program it might not take it - regardless of whether a specific person has encountered that problem or not. Yours, Dora Smith Austin, TX [EMAIL PROTECTED] RootsWeb re

RE: [LegacyUG] still problem with relationship calculator

2006-12-13 Thread ronald ferguson
Sorry, Jenny, but I cannot agree here. If the relationship is through the mother of, say, an illigitimate child then clearly that relationship exists irrespective of the father. I previously gave an example from my own tree where such a relationship exists and *is* displayed. Ron Ferguson __

Re: [LegacyUG] still problem with relationship calculator

2006-12-13 Thread Jenny M Benson
Donna Alden-Bugden wrote No...I tried to set it about 5 or 6 times...and even disconnected and reconnected the family and reset the relationship...won't work. For now I have attached an unknown father for the illeg child so that it will create relationships for me To me, it seems to make sens

Re: [LegacyUG] Standard Usage?

2006-12-13 Thread Lloyd Hite
WILLIAM HATHAWAY wrote: As with almost everyone, I have entries of individuals where I know a GGG-grandfather for example and have a first name and perhaps even marriage and death dates for his wife, but (at least for now, but perhaps it will never be found) no known surname. *