Re: [LegacyUG] Reports - Family Picture Tree - Ver 6 Deluxe

2008-07-29 Thread Bruce Jones
I also get a missing/blank picture in the 4th generation (6th position). On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Trippsibs5 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I noticed a problem in the Family Picture Tree Report (Books/Other) in that the tree looks fine for 3 or fewer generations, but when 4 generations are

Re: [LegacyUG] a problem with a source - let's start again please

2008-07-29 Thread Jette Brix
As your source comes in brackets, I'm almost sure you didn't name the source, but only have an input in the Title field. Since you get the source in a Family Group Record, you should be able to go to the event that the source is attached to (eg. 3), and from there give a name to the source, and

Re: [LegacyUG] a problem with a source - let's start again please

2008-07-29 Thread Jenny M Benson
Valerie Garton wrote Using Version 6 I have a source which appears in the source list at the end of the Family Group Record report which says: A number eg 3 (National Archives of Ireland) - exactly So it looks like this: 3. (National Archives of Ireland) And this is not in my source

Re: [LegacyUG] consistancy in sources

2008-07-29 Thread Paul Croteau
Hello Michael;       I use a very similar system only I have it reversed... eg: 1901 Census - Brantford (and ward # if mentioned), Brant, Ontario, Canada  It must be a french thing, it's in reverse to yours.  :-)  The advantage I found it easier to type in the year first which Legacy

Re: [LegacyUG] a problem with a source ? - Detailed Search

2008-07-29 Thread Dennis M . Kowallek
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:30:59 -0400, Trippsibs5 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A Detailed Search of Source Master Source is not available in Ver 6. That might be the reason you can't find it. The original poster can always export their family file to a GEDCOM (include everything). Then open it in a

Re: [LegacyUG] a problem with a source - let's start again please

2008-07-29 Thread RICHARD SCHULTHIES
Yoy might want to 'create' a source that is a 'duplicate' to the problem one. Attach it to other people, then delete from your person first, then delete from the other people. This we called 'confusing the computer' in computer classes in the '70s. Rich in LA CA --- Valerie Garton [EMAIL

Re: [LegacyUG] consistancy in sources

2008-07-29 Thread RICHARD SCHULTHIES
I use a two barreled system. One is for records pertaining to only a specific location, and the other is author based (family books, e-mail web-pages). I keep them separated by putting a period bevore the first name of the source. Rich in LA CA --- Michael Berry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is

Re: [LegacyUG] consistancy in sources

2008-07-29 Thread Jenny M Benson
Michael Berry wrote Is there a naming convention or pattern in naming sources.  The training video suggests:   Country, State, County, City - date - Census - Name   for a census, but of course there are any number of sources out there.  I don't want to make up my own system which may change

Re: [LegacyUG] a problem with a source - let's start again please

2008-07-29 Thread Gary Templeman
After using the advice below, which will hopefully allow you to see the source in the master list, it then becomes easy find out who else it may be assigned to by clicking show list in the master list. On the next screen you can delete it and all citations n one step. Gary Templeman -

RE: [LegacyUG] consistancy in sources

2008-07-29 Thread Janis Gilmore
Michael, I believe Evidence Explained sets out some simple guidelines for naming sources, and that she recommends using the country, state, etc when possible. Because my research is almost entirely in this country (to this point), I do not use ‘USA’ in my source names. Example from my source

Re: [LegacyUG] consistancy in sources

2008-07-29 Thread Elizabeth Richardson
Michael - naming your sources is for your benefit only in being able to find them in the Master Source list when you want to use a source again. You need to think about how you will go about looking for something in a list. I find Geoff's method of locality a good one for some sources, like

RE: [LegacyUG] consistancy in sources

2008-07-29 Thread Janis Gilmore
Sorry. I changed that posting to plain text just before sending. It appeared to retain the list formatting when I sent it, but when posted to the list it had lost it. For clarity: Examples from my source list. Geographically: Illinois, White - census 1850 (Ancestry) Illinois, White - census 1860

Re: [LegacyUG] consistancy in sources

2008-07-29 Thread RICHARD SCHULTHIES
IMHO, since with sources, the Source List name doesn't print much, and the Title does, I put abbreviations in the SLN, and spell out in the Title. Rich in LA CA --- Elizabeth Richardson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Michael - naming your sources is for your benefit only in being able to find

RE: [LegacyUG] consistancy in sources

2008-07-29 Thread Janis Gilmore
So much for clarity. :-) Janis -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Janis Gilmore Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 9:38 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] consistancy in sources Sorry. I changed that posting to

Re: [LegacyUG] consistancy in sources

2008-07-29 Thread Michael Berry
I am using Legacy 7. I am concerned about the Source List Name Field. - Original Message - From: Jenny M Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 9:40 AM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] consistancy in sources Michael Berry wrote Is there

Re: [LegacyUG] consistancy in sources

2008-07-29 Thread Bruce Jones
Janis, Both postings look fine to me. On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Janis Gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Sorry. I changed that posting to plain text just before sending. It appeared to retain the list formatting when I sent it, but when posted to the list it had lost it. For clarity:

Re: [LegacyUG] Reports - Family Picture Tree - Ver 6 Deluxe

2008-07-29 Thread Trippsibs5
Thanks Bruce, I submitted a problem report. Regards, Jane Tripp - Original Message - From: Bruce Jones To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 2:19 AM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Reports - Family Picture Tree - Ver 6 Deluxe I also get a missing/blank picture

RE: [LegacyUG] consistancy in sources

2008-07-29 Thread Kirsten Bowman
Michael: I think you're dealing with two issues here. As Jenny says, if you use the SourceWriter templates you will have consistent source names because they're automatically defined. And yes, there are established standards for the formal source names--although there's some variation there,

Re: [LegacyUG] ... Time machine ?

2008-07-29 Thread Jane Sarles
Thank you. I hadn't noticed. Jane Brian Smith wrote: Jane Sarles, Unless you have a time machine you aren't telling us about, please fix the date on your computer. If you do have one, please keep us posted on what the stock market will be doing. Brian in San Jose, CA

RE: [LegacyUG] consistancy in sources

2008-07-29 Thread Helen Campbell
I'm new to Legacy but need to know the exact different between Master Source and source name. I have my master sources so I can find them so why do I need source name? Thanks, Helen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Elizabeth Richardson

Re: [LegacyUG] Where to enter a street address?

2008-07-29 Thread Bruce McArthur
Hi all This is an interesting thread. Genealogy programs tend to allow different ways of doing the same things and Legacy is no exception. The bottom line has to be that you put data into the program in such a way as to get the results out that you want from the screen display, mapping and

Re: [LegacyUG] Where to enter a street address?

2008-07-29 Thread Art Seddon
Well put Bruce. That also works for me in the US. Art Seddon - Original Message - From: Bruce McArthur Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Where to enter a street address? Hi all This is an interesting thread. Genealogy programs tend to allow different ways of doing the same things and Legacy

RE: [LegacyUG] consistancy in sources

2008-07-29 Thread Helen Campbell
I know this is a newbie question but I have been doing research for 20+ years. Exactly what does SSDI stand for? I probably am using it but don't know that. Thanks again, Helen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RICHARD SCHULTHIES Sent:

Re: [LegacyUG] consistancy in sources

2008-07-29 Thread Bruce Jones
Just to elaborate, when you go to View, Master Lists, Source you will see a screen titled Master Source List These are the names YOU use (it will not NORMALLY print on any report). It is sorted alphabetically, so you can name the sources how you want to make them easy to find. When you Edit one

RE: [LegacyUG] consistancy in sources

2008-07-29 Thread Helen Campbell
I just read this post and feel so much better about my previous naming of source information. I do all by Census by Census: xxx and Books and Publications:XXX I also add a location at the end of the Master Source, but it is my personal location . This is only a problem if someone wants that

RE: [LegacyUG] consistancy in sources

2008-07-29 Thread Kirsten Bowman
Helen: Think of one as a formal name and one as a shorter informal name. The formal name is what prints out in reports; the informal name is what shows in the Master Source List and the way the list and a bibliography are alphabetized. If you have your master sources so you can find them, then

RE: [LegacyUG] consistancy in sources

2008-07-29 Thread RICHARD SCHULTHIES
IMHO, the Master Source List is, as said previously, a shortened simplified name, and the 'Title' could be seen as the Legal/Formal title. The Title prints on reports, so should be Bibliographcally accurate (sic?). Rich in LA CA --- Helen Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm new to Legacy but

Re: [LegacyUG] consistancy in sources

2008-07-29 Thread Elizabeth Richardson
SSDI is Social Security Death Index, a US source. Elizabeth researching the descendants of William and Sarah (Patterson) Thompson - Original Message - From: Helen Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 4:12 PM Subject: RE:

Re: [LegacyUG] Where to enter a street address?

2008-07-29 Thread RICHARD SCHULTHIES
This is what I do. It may be the long way, but it works. When I enter in a new Location, I keypunch as '3407 Bryn Mawr - Chicago, Illinois, United States'. After it has found and placed the L/L in place, I go back in and change the place to 'Chicago - 3407 Bryn Mawr, Illinois, United States'.

RE: [LegacyUG] consistancy in sources

2008-07-29 Thread RICHARD SCHULTHIES
Social Security Department Index? Rich in LA CA --- Helen Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know this is a newbie question but I have been doing research for 20+ years. Exactly what does SSDI stand for? I probably am using it but don't know that. Thanks again, Helen -Original

RE: [LegacyUG] consistancy in sources

2008-07-29 Thread Helen Campbell
Thanks for the info, Helen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RICHARD SCHULTHIES Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 8:15 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] consistancy in sources Social Security Department Index?

[LegacyUG] v 7 Clooz

2008-07-29 Thread Sheri Harris
I've been using Clooz 2.xx along with Legacy v6, linked together, and it worked okay as far as not having to do a lot of duplicate entering of names, sources, etc. However, Clooz 2.xx will not work with Legacy v7, you can go to the Clooz web site and see what to do to get your database back up. My

[LegacyUG] recent list-member

2008-07-29 Thread Mark Klan
Hello - I've been lurking on this list since I purchased Legacy 6 about 2 months ago. A few years ago I had been a GenBox software user, but in returning to genealogy research recently I wanted to try a package with more modern features. With the update to v. 7, Legacy is working very

[LegacyUG] Pictures in reports

2008-07-29 Thread Noddie
Hi I am once again wondering how to get the 'Pictures' to print out in my reports mainly the Descendant (narrative) which is the only one apart from the individual report I have tried. I can only get the first photo * to show up., event thought I may have 3-4. The others listed do not

RE: [LegacyUG] consistancy in sources

2008-07-29 Thread La Nell Shores
Social Security DEATH Index La Nell Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] consistancy in sources Social Security Department Index? Rich in LA CA Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages:

Re: [LegacyUG] Pictures in reports

2008-07-29 Thread Leon Chapman
Gwen: Only one picture (the default individual picture) gets printed in reports. If you want multiple pictures you have to attach the other pictures to Events for the individual or marriage (for a family picture) and then select to print out event pictures. Another way is to use the Publishing

Re: [LegacyUG] Pictures in reports

2008-07-29 Thread Noddie
i Chap Thanks heaps for that. It does seem a long winded way but I guess it is the most logical. I have not done that before Just thrown them all into the picture icon window and added them there., Individual, Birth etc. I feel I have a lot of sorting out to do. How time consuming wish I

Re: [LegacyUG] Pictures in reports

2008-07-29 Thread RICHARD SCHULTHIES
When printing a report, the program will only print the preferred photo, so some people add events to the individual to use the Event's photo to get more to print. I haven't used it myself, but others have said it worked. Some have used the slide show, to put more photos on a page. I hope you find

Re: [LegacyUG] Pictures in reports

2008-07-29 Thread Noddie
Hi again I have changed the individual photo for my chap and put the one that would not print into the Death event. I went to Publishing centre and tried to print out both photos I have for this chap. One is individual and the other attached to Event, death. I can only get the Individual

Re: [LegacyUG] Pictures in reports

2008-07-29 Thread Leon Chapman
It is definitely a limitation to the program. We would like to be able to print multiple pictures for an individual within a report. Maybe they will implement it one of these days. Chap On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 9:53 PM, Noddie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i Chap Thanks heaps for that. It does seem