I have a similar situation, I believe, where one of my people changed his
name a few times.
For his main name, I used his birth name - and put each of his other names
as aka's, and documented them.He is linked to everyone he is related to,
using his birth name. It is a matter of opinion as t
So far, I haven't put in unlinked people into my Legacy database - except
maybe in notes of probably related people. I'm finding that they are
pretty easy to "lose" - that is, I forget all about their existance.
Anyway, I've got a thought in my mind that I'm writting here, partially for
opinions
Go to your Address list (I just did a click on the + of a burial event.
Click on "Address List" button. Find your cemetary, and select it, then
click on "Show List" That will give you a list of everyone that used that
cemetary.
>From there, there is a Print button, or you can tag everyone if
Well, I would do something like
Washington, , District of Columbia, United States
I don't know if there is a county or not.
On Jan 24, 2008 6:22 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How should District of Columbia for Washington, D.C. be sited? City,
> County, State, USA???
>
>
>
Legacy User
Just want to say that I personally would never use a filing system that uses
MRIN's or RIN's as the basis.
The reason? Several years ago, I did (MRINs) - and then something
happened, and all my MRINs got changed. Fortunately, I had on all my file
folders the Surname, Firstname, so was able to
You can add as many sources as you want to any fact. Just go to the correct
souce location, and add the source.
On Jan 21, 2008 2:08 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a similar question. One may for example have multiple secondary
> sources for a piece of information, but no primary sourc
I haven't used it much at this point - I'm sure other people have some
ideas but I did use a focus group to create a Gedcom to send to my mom
- it consisted of a few families that I had been doing research on. Then
she only had to merge a few people. (She uses a different program, and the
m
It depends a lot on your email provider.
For instance, on gmail you don't see your own posting, until you get a
response from someone (at which point you see your own too.)Probably
your email provider just doesn't give you your own email to the list.
On Jan 20, 2008 12:29 PM, John Murray <[EM
This is also currently a BETA site. It is currently limited to members of
the Church - THAT reside in a certain area. I do not live in the right
areas (don't know which they are) - so even though I AM a member of the
church, I also can not access this new site.
I am quite sure that this is to li
lly the name is enough to find it.
On Jan 18, 2008 4:35 PM, Bruce Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the clear explanation and examples.
> One question, why do you use a numbering system for documents but not
> for pictures?
>
> On Jan 18, 2008 8:08 AM, Heather Stov
I have my genealogy pictures in 4 ancestral line folders under 1 folder. I
have the same structure but starting with a different folder for
scans/pictures of source documents.
So I have, under my genealogy directory, a folder named "Genealogy
Pictures". Under that folder I have folders named M
My system...
Cal 1840 means that I have an age and date, so I've calculated the
date. So if in the 1861 census the person was listed as age 21. Same with
stuff like ages at marriage, death, or other events. I put the
calculation in the source notes.
Abt 1840 I don't use this too mu
what type of a comment are you looking for? It sounds like on the other
subject, many people have said that
if you have many files, there will generally be at least 1 person duplicated
for each file - so then you get confusion as to which file has the correct
info (as you are unlikely to rem
Ok - it has been a while, but I think this type of thing has come up
before... I don't remember the details - but this might get you on
the right track.
I think when you enter a name, like a surname, it is stored in a
list which is used kind of for auto-completion. I think any
quirks of
www.familysearch.org has a couple of census (as an index - no images)
for free
I think it is 1881 Canadian, 1881 UK, and 1880 US.
I have found various Canadian census for free on the internet by doing
searches through google. Sometimes an index that geneaolgy societies
are making, but I
I know you have already rethougt putting the info on the internet for
you living family - just thought I'd add another reason.
You mentioned the info would be for your immediate family, including
children, and would include stuff like hobbies, the church you attend
etc.
Although somewhat rare (bu
Well, I don't know what the Charting Companion does, so hard to
answer but the upcoming charting abilities in Legacy 7 are
excellent, and does include various types of colour coding, including
the 4 grandparent line "standard" option.
On Jan 5, 2008 5:13 PM, Michele Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Did the person who didn't carry on as No. 1 individual on another
chart have any parents entered? If not, then he doesn't need another
chart.
On Jan 3, 2008 9:28 PM, Thomas Herson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Today I entered the ancestors of my new son-in-law to my family file.. When
> I p
Adobe Photoshop Starter Edition is also free, you can label the
people/places/events on each picture, and then look at pictures based
on it. You can easily do combinations. (ie, you want a picture of
Tom and Sally in L.A. at a Birthday)
On Dec 31, 2007 8:54 PM, Cathy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
Actually, how a database functions depends a LOT on how the
programmers (or database designer) set it up.I am both a software
developer and a database designer, so I know what I'm talking about.
The process of reducing copies of redundant data that will show up in
a database is called "Normaliz
And just to add in - in the states wasn't it called being made a
Freeman when a slave was set free or bought himself free? (and also
a common surname amoung people because of that?)
On Dec 24, 2007 8:28 AM, John Clare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Freeman is not a fraternal, nor a social nor re
Well, ok, I've been biting my tounge, enjoying the overall thread
I do remember the personal computers that only had switches on them -
although the first computers I really remember using (other than a
mainframe at the University) was computers like the "Exidy (sp?)
sorcerer", the "Commador P
oh - and to see it everywhere, go to
Options-Customize- View
then - Mark the checkbox "Display custom generation line colors on screen"
On Dec 10, 2007 11:21 PM, Heather Stovold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes - select the person you want it to start from - and then go
Yes - select the person you want it to start from - and then go to
"Tools" - then select "Apply Ancestral Colours"
I think there might be somewhere to change which colours are which
(maybe not. can't remember) - but it defaults to the colours you
listed.
On Dec 10, 2007 9:18 PM, Michele Lewi
Just a thought
I've found it very handy to have an estimated birthdate for everyone.
It helps keep people of similar names straight, and of course helps
with the automatic setting of living/dead.
I just go through my index and look for people that don't have a
birthdate (would be easier i
The charting that will be in V7 will be able to do this. I don't
think you really can in V6
>
> Kathy Shiell-Stokes wrote:
> > I am trying to do a photo family tree for my parents depicting all of
> > their children and grandchildren. Is this possible.?
> >
Give Legacy as a Gift for 25% Off. V
I seem to have that happen every so often It will all be fine,
then for about a week a fair number of emails end up in my spam folder
- and then it is fine again. Not sure what happens or changes - and
as you have a different provider than I do, it may or may not be the
same thing
On Dec 2,
Besides important events, I try to have a baby picture, a picture as a
youth (say 10-12ish), one as a young adult (22ish) and a current one.
I minor feature I'd like, and should really request, is to be able to
designate a child picture and an adult picture in the program for each
person that I ha
and Adobe has a less full-featured one called Adobe Photoshop Album
Starter Edition. You can "tag" all the photos, and then look at the
ones you want, create basic slideshows, etc.
and the best part - it is free!!!
On Nov 30, 2007 9:01 PM, Connie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adobe Photoshop Ele
With my method, no people were created - just the relationship between
the two siblings. (Try it - neither parent exists in the database.
There is a "ghost marriage" as it has been called on the user group
before, with the 2 children linked to this marriage.) As neither
parent has been created in
Honestly, as a computer software developer (not for Legacy), It is
pretty much unheard of to list every single change that has gone into
a release - especially something like a single period being printed
where it should not. In any software program, for each release, there
is often hundreds of ch
John - you set this to the Legacy Chart group by mistake - I am
assuming as you put the Legacy User Group in your question that you
are subscribed to the L.U.G. and just picked the wrong one. I'm
answering to LUG so you might get more answers and also direct to
you just in case
I had a
http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/
Found by entering "Legacy Software" (no quotes) into google
>
can see I am very cognaznt of the software I am using. Can or would
anyone tell me the web site name to down the legacy deluxe version +
all the goode programs that can be downloaded as well. Thanky
Don't know how you can easily display the full path
but the people that put their main database on their portable HD (or
Flash-drive, or whatever) recommend backing up to the various computers they
use thus getting the backup on various media that you are trying to
acheive
>
> Yes, I
Just a couple of thoughts about the IGI.
Yes - a lot of it is submitted by people - so you do have to watch out.
But with a little effort, depending on when it was submitted, you can
sometimes order the source film and get contact info for the person that
submitted it - giving you a possible new c
Why not? All it would be doing is moving the info for the one person, and
automatically filling in the source - how would that harm Ancestry any more
than you hand-typing in the info and source for that person?
On Nov 26, 2007 11:52 AM, ronald ferguson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Michele,
>
BEPSC are abbreviations for the LDS temple ordinances. When any have
been done, the appropriate letter will be there.
heather
On Nov 25, 2007 7:58 PM, Michele Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What does the column labeled BEPSC in the IGI search window mean? I never
> show anything checked off
One other thing about surnames in all-caps
I know for a fact, that a different genealogy program a few years ago
stored all names in one list. (I don't think that program does
anymore, so I'm not saying which one.) That list included place names
(a city, or a state, or a country, etc) f
If using the Burial Addresses (accessed by the + beside the Burial
location)
When it has the place to fill in the name and address - click on the
button on the right that says "Address List" - you can then reuse
places that you used before. (more than one person buried there,
etc...)
If you
Well, this might not be the only reason - but there may be more than
one "St. Mary's Cemetary" (for example) - so the address list could be
confusing if you didn't put the city, state (or whatever) in the
cemetary's address...
On 11/19/07, Barbara Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, that is w
As to the abbreviations, people pretty much do as they want - but I
know a lot of genealogy societies say to write it out in full.
I'm not from the US - so I didn't have a clue where AR was until you
said so - (Arizona came to mind - but that is AZ, right?) - so it adds
confusion for me. I'd have
Family Tree Maker, I understand, it basically makes a whole copy of
each picture and stores it in the program. This also takes up more
hard disk space generally, as you usually have the picture someplace
on your hard drive for use elsewhere, and then it takes space again in
the FTM file.
Legacy s
I have to agree with Glen, that it is almost assuredly not feasable
from a cost standpoint to have a binder book format. I too remember
when manuals came that way, and it became far to cost prohibitive.
I also remember when I was a leader with Girl Guides of Canada - one
year they made the "Poli
Thanks for the verification!
Richard - if you turn on the view 1/2 children, then all children of
either parent will show up. The 1/2 children show up after the "full"
children, and are shown with "1/2" before their names, and the name of
their other parent in brackets. I learned about this fea
I have turned on View 1/2 kids in Family View (thanks to this list for
pointing it out - I love it!)
But I am noticing an anomaly, which I will see if I can explain clearly.
I have an ancestor, Ellen McCaslin. She had 3 children while single,
which I have entered with a single unknown father.
And just for a different point of view I use AKA's for any
spelling variation, or name use, as well as married names for females.
I have a person that I used an AKA to show a spelling variation on
an index (but was ok on the original). I use it that way so that I
can easily find people in L
No further download should be needed. When you have unlocked it, you
will be able to access the deluxe features.
Heather
On 11/8/07, DianeLeMasson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> As of now I've been using the free standard version Legacy 6.
> My question is, if I upgrade to the deluxe is the
Yeah, I figure that would generally be the best too... lol. Although
the news tends to leak out through beta-testers anyway..
And most software companies are lucky that they CAN delay a release if
needed. The company I worked for the longest as a software developer
had a very set schedule
I would in the main record use the name that he went by - and put the
other names in AKA's, with sources and notes to explain. I'm sure
other people will have other suggestions!
> How do I mark my father with proper naming? He was
> adopted when he was 16, but has always, since infancy
> gone by
Well, I would put what it showed on the certificates
I'd probably put
Infant Twin 1 /Allen/
Infant Twin 2 /Allen/
For the other family... it might be a touch confusing at first look
but I'd have
Infant Twin 1 /Teague/
Infant Twin 2 /Teague/
Infant Twin 1 /Teague/
Infant Twin 2 /Teague
Valerie - it is hard to help if you can't tell me what the worse mess is.
You had the 2 people entered into legacy only once - but you had the
marriage set up twice. The instructions I gave should get rid of one
marriage, and they should be all good.
I'm sorry - but it is hard to help if I don't
Valerie - if both Patrick's have the same RIN, and both Elizabeth's
have the same RIN then you don't have the people entered twice.
You probably have 2 marriage records for them. What you need to do
is get them on the family screen, with the marriage that you don't
want to keep, and then unli
> Today's Legacy tip is about Searching your family file for information.
>
>
>
> 1) Via the Legacy Home tab in the News section.
>
>
>
> Do you mean in my program ?
Yes, that tab is in the Legacy Program. It will access the internet,
however, if you click on the news section
> 2)
Well, if I have more than one set of parents for someone, (step-kids,
people that were adopted, whatever) I mark the one set as
biological, and the other set as whatever is appropriate
adoptive, step-parent, whatever.
I'm not saying the biological parents had the child illegitimate -
I have often "dragged and dropped" people from one database to another
in split screen. When you do that, it opens up a little import
window and gets some info on if you want just the person, their
family, etc etc and then it can even go to the merge in the
destination database. Have had ab
Of course assuming that none of those people are the same people
(pedigree collapse which eventually happens for everyone at some
point!)
One of my friends when I was a teenager genealogist was also a
teenager genealogist (how rare is that!) - and of her 8
great-grand-parents. 3 of her g
t;Personal Knowledge of Heather Stovold" in there.
(like, that is an "unspecified" source for my own record in the
program, and for my husband.) - I wouldn't use it generally though,
as it is better to source exactly what information you got from that
source.
Legacy U
Well, I guess Canada would make 2.
but I suspect that that is why the Legacy Manual is in whatever format
it is instead of setup to be put in a binder
On 9/23/07, Mike Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hwedhlor wrote:
> > Perhaps the ISO standards need to be changed. :-)
>
> Perhaps. But
I personally always use the name of the place as it was at the time of
the event
So (using a Canadian example, as that is where I research)
for Etobicoke, York, Ontario, Canada..
before 1841 I name itEtobicoke, York, Upper Canada, British North America
bet 1841 and 1867 it is Etob
He would be entered as a Step-Parent
On 9/21/07, Jim Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Greetings:
>
> Changing the direction a wee bit...
>
> If the time is prior to 1926, when adoption was formally legalized in
> England... how would one enter in the daughter of one of the parents, and
> who
Hi Chuck!
No problem with asking questions!
You can actually enter the children once, and then link them to more than
one set of parents. Then, under Child Status, you can specify which parents
are biological, and which are adopted.
As for which names to put them under, that is really up to you
Going by memory - there is a spot within legacy (I think I found it under
the Edit menu - then Tags or something like that) that you can set up a
label for each tag. For the rest, I suspect you are out of luck
On 9/18/07, Pat Hickin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is there some way WITHIN
ytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
--
"ImagineLife on your terms!"
http://tupperware.epromos.info/english.htm
Heather Stovold
Tupperware Consultant
Le
And I realize these are standard codes. but it is amazing how quickly
they can be out-of-date...
For instance there was no code listed for
Nunavut, Canada. It is a Territory that was added in 1999.
When I was growing up, the provinces (except BC and PEI) had a 4 letter code
(and most c
Ok - I have to admit that I had thought of the idea and put it up here
before researching it I was figuring on editing the sentence definition
- but of course AKA's aren't a regular event, so they don't have a sentence
definition. Oh well, it was a good idea!
On 9/11/07, Jan Roberts <[EMAI
Well, I'd either have the "marriage" record setup for her to be linked up to
either an unknown person - or make a fake "no person" person set the
marriage status to NOT MARRIED. and then have the child linked to them
with the child status of adopted. And yeah, I'd add a bunch of notes.
Well, I also put spelling variations for each individual in the AKA's
Basically, the main name I'm using goes in the appropriate name fields
and any variation or typo is put in as an AKA as found in the source (or
sources if more than one uses the same variation.) I then attach the
source
Thanks Robert - I know I viewed it and all the other free stuff way back
when I first starting using Legacy - and I do appreciate it! It just still
doesn't make sense to me when I'm looking at a document going "what the heck
to I enter into where"... you know? I hope the templates help!
On 9/8
Well, personally I like the handling of step-kids (as I have some!) - It
handles having the kids hooked to both parents - but where it is above
everything else I've used is that you can set the parent relationship
seperately for each parent! So I can keep their dad's relationship to them
as biolog
Legacy handles step-children, adopted children, multiple marriages, etc.
just fine. Better than some other programs I've used. No worries. (The
person was saying if a person wanted a program that only dealt with
basically what I'll call genetic genealogy) - that there would be no need
for these
I am actually doing a similar task in some ways I inherited a poorly
sourced gedcom from my dad - and continued with it for quite a while.
Again, I generally didn't know who was who, although the set-relationships
helps.
So - I've been working on a brand new file - only adding in people as I
I know you got a way to do it already - and I definately don't want to
continue this - but I think you can also put both people in as having an
"unknown" sex to get around it I think I already played around with
this onceagain, it isn't perfect - but it is easier than using
Access
I would think that for now, you might be best off using the relationship
chart anyway.
Run it for persons 1 and 2. it will say that common ancestor is person
A
Run it for persons 1 and 3 maybe the common ancestor is person B
Run it for person 1 and 4 maybe the common ancestor i
://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree
Charting will be awesome in v7!
On 8/31/07, B.Paris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Cathy.
>
> Thanks for your email and I'll give your tips a try. I feel I've got to
> make these charts just to be able to see and clarify names, dates etc., in
> my mind.
>
> Look forward to version 7 if it's go
letter or mailing list.
>
> On 8/30/07, Heather Stovold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > And I would put TO UNSUBSCRIBE in all caps or something - as people
> can't
> > seem to find it!
> >
> >
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamily
And I would put TO UNSUBSCRIBE in all caps or something - as people can't
seem to find it!
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://ww
well, I put it in the source details of the birth (or alt. birth) myself...
- I bet that wasn't what you would expect! But I would take whatever
document gave me that age, and then calculate the birth date. If I didn't
have a birth date before, then I would enter CAL 1822 (or whatever) in the
bi
Hi, usted ha firmado para arriba para una lista que enviaba que envía estos
mensajes. También he firmado para arriba para ella. Usted necesita
cancelarla usted mismo chascando en este acoplamiento. He traducido este
mensaje con una herramienta de la tela, así que espero que tenga sentido.
Espero qu
gacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp<http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/Help.asp>
>
> To unsubscribe please visit:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp<http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp>
>
--
"ImagineLife on your terms!"
http://tupperware
lyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
>
> To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
>
> For online technical support, please visit
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
>
> To unsubscribe ple
For online technical support, please visit
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
>
> To unsubscribe please visit:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
--
"ImagineLife on your terms!"
http://tupperware.epromos.info/english.htm
Heather St
o unsubscribe please visit:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
--
"ImagineLife on your terms!"
http://tupperware.epromos.info/english.htm
Heather Stovold
Tupperware Consultant
Have you unlocked the real power of Legacy? Legacy 6.0 Deluxe has 92 feat
got this in one of the startup tips
on Family view, bottom right corner, there is the last modified date. If
you click on it, you get a window with the modified dates of the people
shown.
Have you unlocked the real power of Legacy? Legacy 6.0 Deluxe has 92 features
not found in the St
I see a lot of people have already commented on the question to me about
where I got my estimates. The total truth is, I don't remember for sure!
I am LDS, so probably in some literature there I also am constantly
reading genealogy books and magazines - even beginner ones (you never know
wh
no, to me they are all different.
cal - means I was given an age and a time so he was 34 in 1834, so his
birth is: cal 1800
abt - means that someone gave me an about time, like in an interview so
I ask someone when their parent was born and they say oh, it was about 1910,
then I put abt
I'm not familiar with the naming rules of those nationalities, but if it
were me, I would put in any name that they are by which they are ever likely
to be refered in any sources you use.
Hope this helps!
>
> I've got names to add to my family file for families that didn't
> immigrate, and was
Well, I learned it here - but setting the options to show the headings
differently if the person is alive is nice. And - just found out about the
on another thread on a lot of screens, to see the ages people were
at various main events...
Heather
Have you unlocked the real power of Legacy? Le
Sorry - I sent this to the wrong group!
On 8/17/07, Heather Stovold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Just got started today (it has been a crazy week) -
>
Have you unlocked the real power of Legacy? Legacy 6.0 Deluxe has 92 features
not found in the Standard Edition
Just got started today (it has been a crazy week) - I'm still running
the search wizard to find my databases. I know it says it will take several
minutes (and believe me, it is) - just wondering - it is currently
searching all my temporary internet files. Couldn't it skip those
directori
And as a software developer (not of Legacy) I have another point.
I used to work on manufacturing software. One day, while working on a new
feature in one of our software packages, I discovered a gigantic bug in
another programmer's work. I realized immediately, that the bug could,
under the rig
I wouldn't have duplicates of the sources - I'd have 1 source which might
point to more than one piece of info for that person.
(ie, I might have a Birth Record source pointed to Name, Birth, Rel Mother,
Rel Father) What I do is put in the source detail comments the actual
info found.
I wou
I went through my data, and put in Estimated birthdates for everyone
So the format, for instance, would be
Birth: Est 1822
This is different from my Calculated birthdates, and my About dates.
(Calculated means I have their age at some point in time... About generally
means that someone els
Well, I have used Clooz - I really like it, and the new version can link to
a Legacy database to reduce re-entry of data. but I didn't link mine.
I haven't put in a lot of stuff into Clooz yet, but I think it can be
helpful to try to figure stuff out
The other thing you might do, is setup
I had modified my toolbar (added the split-view button, removed Passage
Express) and it didn't change my toolbar when I installed the update
On 8/6/07, Mike Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> also, restores the toolbar to the default for a new installation. Again,
> most annoying.
Have y
Well, I haven't done tonnes of research
mtDNA tests information through the mother's line (so wouldn't have anything
about my McCaslin's...) it is a test that I could actually take - but
I'm really not sure how much use it would be to me As it gives me info
through my mom, my grandm
aslin)
who came to Canada about the same time then that might tell us if the 2
lines are related...
So I never did any more research on DNA genealogy
--
"ImagineLife on your terms!"
http://tupperware.epromos.info/english.htm
Heather Stovold
Tupperware Consultant
Have y
Does the database change?
Have you unlocked the real power of Legacy? Legacy 6.0 Deluxe has 92 features
not found in the Standard Edition. Learn more about these features at
http://legacyfamilytree.com/DeluxeEdition.asp.
Legacy User Group guidelines can be found at:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTr
Ok - I haven't ever had to do this - but I am talking as a computer
programmer (not on this program) and using that background to think of what
you may or may not lose. this may or may not be right
I think you would be unlikely to lose any of the real data including the
events. (if you d
She did say that it would be a text email
On 7/30/07, Sherry/Support <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Linda,
>
> Attachments are *not* allowed on the list. PLEASE do not send attachments
> to this list. If you have a website, you may place your files on the
> website and then send a link to th
101 - 200 of 269 matches
Mail list logo
