Actually there was an apology sent just about straight away.
Cheers
Jan
- Original Message -
From: "Eric Carlson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 5:04 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] 8MB attachments
>"The sad part, the
individual who
s is such fun.
> >
> > Yours,
> > Dora Smith
> > Austin, TX
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: Dick Davis
> > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> > Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2006 8:46 PM
> > Subjec
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:LegacyUserGroup-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Carlson
> Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 7:04 AM
>
> >"The sad part, the
> >individual who made this major blunder hasn't even had the common
> courtesy to
> >apologize."
He did
arlson
Las Vegas, NV
On 12/4/06, Dora Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But this is such fun.
Yours,
Dora Smith
Austin, TX
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Dick Davis
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2006 8:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Legac
But this is such fun.
Yours,
Dora Smith
Austin, TX
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Dick Davis
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2006 8:46 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] 8MB attachments
I think that I need to create a rule "
1. I did indeed receive the "much discussed" attachment. It was a Legacy
zip file of a database. I deleted it.
2. The sender stated he had sent the zip file to Henry Peterson.
3. While I cannot speak for the sender, it appears (from the #2 statement
above) that he did not intend to transm
> In a message dated 12/3/2006 6:15:41 P.M. Mountain Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> may be misunderstanding you here, Glenda. I have understood
>> attachments as being separate files not in the body of the e-
>> mail, and, yes I have to click on them to open them, just like
>> you.
PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "David S Brookes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2006 7:47 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] 8MB attachments
Now I am worried. I have done a complete search of the computer, including
hidden and system files and there
I think that I need to create a rule "kill the 8MB attachments" --- this is
history people, move on to the topics of fun!
Original message
From: "Dora Smith"
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Received: 12/3/2006 9:27:44 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] 8MB attachments
]
- Original Message -
From: June McDonald
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2006 8:21 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] 8MB attachments
Dave, I am using IE6. I chose to show the attachment marker (a paper clip).
It shows on some posts on the LUG, not all, but
something that big.
Yours,
Dora Smith
Austin, TX
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Nicholas Cirillo
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2006 5:37 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] 8MB attachments
I have been following this and other
;s capital
- Original Message -
From: David S Brookes
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 11:35 AM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] 8MB attachments
June,
The way I understand it is that anyone can add a 'flag' to an e-mail and it
does
check for any responses tomorrow - it's now 2.15am here so must
get some sleep
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ruth Ann
Larson
Sent: 04 December 2006 02:10
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG]
On 04/12/06, David S Brookes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now I am worried. I have done a complete search of the computer, including
hidden and system files and there is no Leggitt.zip anywhere.
ENOUGH ALL READY it was only an attachment not a bomb.
Let's get back onto Legacy and Genealogy
--
Rootsweb has a Legacy mailing list. Rootsweb does not allow
attachments and *does* allow a digest move. Beats me why Legacy Support
wants to run this list when they pick such lousy list software, and they
could just monitor the Rootsweb one.
Ruth Ann
p.s. ma
December 2006 00:17
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com;
LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] 8MB attachments
At 00:05 04/12/2006, David S Brookes wrote:
>Dear all,
>
>I have to say, I have no recollection of ever
>having an 8MB attachment, or for tha
In a message dated 12/3/2006 6:15:41 P.M. Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
may be misunderstanding you here, Glenda. I have understood attachments
as being separate files not in the body of the e-mail, and, yes I have to
click on them to open them, just like you.
Nope -
chment. And it was sent
to the LegacyUG mailing list address.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David S
Brookes
Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2006 7:52 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] 8MB attach
ir email client
automatically opens attachments? -- Alice
> [Original Message]
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Date: 12/3/2006 7:25:00 PM
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] 8MB attachments
>
> I am using the dreaded AOL and yes, I did change to plain text after
> le
nt: Sunday, December 03, 2006 4:47 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] 8MB attachments
Nicholas Cirillo wrote
>I have been following this and other lists for awhile. I'm convinced
>that most users have no idea how to trim their replies. I suggest you
>highl
mber 2006 00:17
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] 8MB attachments
In a message dated 12/3/2006 5:09:10 P.M. Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
have to say, I have no recollection of ever having an 8MB attachment, or
for
that matter any attachment with an e
Nicholas Cirillo wrote
I have been following this and other lists for awhile. I'm convinced
that most users have no idea how to trim their replies. I suggest you
highlight the parts you donot want to repeat, like anything beyond the
immediate message you are responding to. Do this by holding t
At 00:35 04/12/2006, Art Sedddon wrote:
In case the file has any personal info connected
to a living person broadcasting a family file is an invite to identity theft.
Where and when you were born and your mother's
maiden name give a crook a good start.
Art Seddon
Art,
In which case, a reti
In case the file has any personal info connected to a living person
broadcasting a family file is an invite to identity theft.
Where and when you were born and your mother's maiden name give a crook a good
start.
Art Seddon
*** Give the gift of Legacy for the holidays! Order online at
http:/
LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] 8MB attachments
I too never receive any attachments. What confuses me tho, is that emails
come in showing an attachment 'flag' but there never is any attachment, and
as I say, definitely not the one being discussed. Why is it that some
I really couldn't believe the 8MB, bit so I checked my e-mail list. 8MB is
about 8112KB. The largest e-mail that I have has this month is 161KB and
that was with a pdf file attached (not from LUG). I have deleted the
original start of this thread, but surely the writer meant 8KB?
I also suspec
Oops, - I forgot to mention I did get this last email with the attachment
with no delay I am aware of.
Glenda Holmes
*** Give the gift of Legacy for the holidays! Order online at
http://legacyfamilytree.com/Redirect/Store-Legacy.asp or call 1-800-753-3453.
***
Legacy User Group guidelines
In a message dated 12/3/2006 5:09:10 P.M. Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
have to say, I have no recollection of ever having an 8MB attachment, or for
that matter any attachment with an e-mail from LUG. All of the e-mails come
with the text in the body of the e-mail and no
At 00:05 04/12/2006, David S Brookes wrote:
Dear all,
I have to say, I have no recollection of ever
having an 8MB attachment, or for that matter any
attachment with an e-mail from LUG. All of the
e-mails come with the text in the body of the
e-mail and not as a separate file attached. I
c
d
Canberra, the nation's capital
- Original Message -
From: David S Brookes
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 11:05 AM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] 8MB attachments
Dear all,
I have to say, I have no recollection of ever having an 8MB atta
Dear all,
I have to say, I have no recollection of ever having an 8MB attachment, or
for that matter any attachment with an e-mail from LUG. All of the e-mails
come with the text in the body of the e-mail and not as a separate file
attached. I certainly can't even remember having an e-mail from
I have been following this and other lists for awhile. I'm convinced that most
users have no idea how to trim their replies. I suggest you highlight the parts
you donot want to repeat, like anything beyond the immediate message you are
responding to. Do this by holding the mouse over the first
@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2006 1:31 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] 8MB attachments
In a message dated 12/3/2006 2:52:41 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please let's not send huge attachments to the list. Not everyone has
unlimited mailbox size. Mine overflowed, I e
I don't care what argument support tries to use,
the folks at Legacy made a major blunder with the server and software they
selected. They definitely did a major disservice to their subscribers
I wholeheartedly concur. I was one who subscribed to the Digest form,
and could "scan" it much mor
In a message dated 12/3/2006 2:52:41 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please let's not send huge attachments to the list. Not everyone has
unlimited mailbox size. Mine overflowed, I expect I'm now unsubbed from
who knows which lists. I guess this will serve as a test i
> Please let's not send huge attachments to the list. Not everyone
> has unlimited mailbox size. Mine overflowed, I expect I'm now
> unsubbed from who knows which lists. I guess this will serve as a
> test if I've been bounced off the LUG. There are pros and cons to
> every email solution, so pleas
Please let's not send huge attachments to the list. Not everyone has
unlimited mailbox size. Mine overflowed, I expect I'm now unsubbed from
who knows which lists. I guess this will serve as a test if I've been
bounced off the LUG. There are pros and cons to every email solution, so
please don'
37 matches
Mail list logo
