ed as Smith) were:
Try several variations and see what you think.
Bill
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:LegacyUserGroup-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hope Bagot Bees
> Sent: 22-Jan-08 5:50 AM
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Event--[WifeSurname] versus
[WifeMarriedSurname]
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:47:44 -0500
If you follow the standard formats used by NEHGS or NGSQ, the maiden
name
should appear between the given names and the married surname,
enclosed in
paren
Hi Mary,
Exactly. :-) If I were wanting all the Marriage information I'd be
looking at a Family Group Sheet. I hardly ever use them either ;-) .
I only use them for sharing one family or showing what information I
have on one family so a family member can correct or add.
However, other people
N.W. England See:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Event--[WifeSurname] versus [WifeMarriedSurname]
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:47:44
9:03 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Event--[WifeSurname] versus [WifeMarriedSurname]
Hi Gary,
The Help file clearly states that these codes ONLY work in the
Marriage Events. There is an enhancement request in, I believe, to
add Marriage events to Individual reports. H
; Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 6:00 PM
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Event--[WifeSurname] versus [WifeMarriedSurname]
>
> Gary - I didn't follow the whole thread, so I'm sorry if this was asked.
>
> Was the event created in Marriage Events or Indivi
age-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:LegacyUserGroup-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Daily
> > Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 6:00 PM
> > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Event--[WifeSurname] versus [WifeMarriedSurna
21, 2008 6:00 PM
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Event--[WifeSurname] versus [WifeMarriedSurname]
>
> Gary - I didn't follow the whole thread, so I'm sorry if this was asked.
>
> Was the event created in Marriage Events or Individual Ev
Gary - I didn't follow the whole thread, so I'm sorry if this was asked.
Was the event created in Marriage Events or Individual Events? I would
think it cannot work in Individual Events because the program would
not know which marriage to take the surname from. At least a Marriage
Event would show
t; [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Bienia
> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 12:48 PM
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Event--[WifeSurname] versus [WifeMarriedSurname]
>
> If you follow the standard formats used by NEHGS or NGSQ, the maiden name
gt; To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Event--[WifeSurname] versus [WifeMarriedSurname]
> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:47:44 -0500
>
> If you follow the standard formats used by NEHGS or NGSQ, the maiden name
> should appear between the given names and the married
Bienia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 12:47:44 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Event--[WifeSurname] versus [WifeMarriedSurname]
If you follow the standard formats used by NEHGS or NGSQ, the maiden name
should appear between the given nam
gt; To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Event--[WifeSurname] versus [WifeMarriedSurname]
> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:47:44 -0500
>
> If you follow the standard formats used by NEHGS or NGSQ, the maiden name
> should appear between the given names and the married
Sent: 20-Jan-08 11:40 PM
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Event--[WifeSurname] versus [WifeMarriedSurname]
>
> Hmmm.. I've never seen "née Maiden Name" use between the woman's given
> name and married surname.
>
> Shouldn
D]
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 5:45:06 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Event--[WifeSurname] versus [WifeMarriedSurname]
Gary,
I was just setting something like this up this afternoon, where I wanted the
sentence to read (using your name examples):
"Children of Seth and Irene (née SIMONSON)
Bill Bienia wrote:
Gary,
I was just setting something like this up this afternoon, where I wanted the
sentence to read (using your name examples):
"Children of Seth and Irene (née SIMONSON) ANDREWS were:"
I ended up using:
Children of [HusbFirstName] and [WifeFirstName] (née [WifeSurname])
[Hu
lytree.com
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Event--[WifeSurname] versus [WifeMarriedSurname]
>
> A quick scan of the archives did not reveal an answer to this issue---
>
> I don't understand the difference between [WifeSurname] and
> [WifeMarriedSurname] when creating an Event Definiti
Hi Gary,
I've never noticed the code [WifeMarriedSurname] or
[HusbMarriedSurname] before. Probably shows how long it is since I've
edited an Event Sentence Definitions or at least had to look up a
code to do it.
I suspect it is something in the pipeline and not fully implemented
yet as ther
A quick scan of the archives did not reveal an answer to this issue---
I don't understand the difference between [WifeSurname] and
[WifeMarriedSurname] when creating an Event Definition. It appears both
result in the same outcome.
Irene SIMONSON married Seth ANDERSON. I would expect Irene's [Wi
19 matches
Mail list logo
