@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Sunday, May 04, 2008 3:38 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Place names - historically accurate AND using Geo
Location List?
Kimberley,
Many, if not most, of us outside America only use the Geolocation List for
guidance. The four name field convention does not work
I want to make use of the Geo Locations List (for the geographic
coordinates), but don't want to lose the historically accurate place
names in the Master Location List.
None of the locations are in the United States, but still use a four
position naming convention (1st = town or equivalent; 4th =
PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Saturday, May 3, 2008 12:23:38 PM
Subject: [LegacyUG] Place names - historically accurate AND using Geo Location
List?
I want to make use of the Geo Locations List (for the geographic
coordinates), but don't want to lose the historically
I'm not looking for a database of every possible combination - only to
be able to use the existing database to link physically identical
locations in my Master Location List, which are uniquely named for the
very practical research purposes.
2008/5/3 Wynthner [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
That is about the
] Place names - historically accurate AND using Geo
Location List?
I want to make use of the Geo Locations List (for the geographic
coordinates), but don't want to lose the historically accurate place
names in the Master Location List.
None of the locations are in the United States, but still use
5 matches
Mail list logo
