Re: [LegacyUG] Problem with Event sort when the date is 13-14 Apr 1930

2009-07-27 Thread Gene Young
RICHARD SCHULTHIES wrote: What I have done, (which is cheating) is 'study the obvious(?) path taken on the two days', using the township map to GUESS the hour that matches best, I found that on the 2 days of the taker's path, he was found on day one, on two different spurs out of town, and the nex

RE: [LegacyUG] Problem with Event sort when the date is 13-14 Apr 1930

2009-07-27 Thread RICHARD SCHULTHIES
I noted the guess as data. It may not always work out to make a 'discovery' of this type. Good luck, Rich --- On Mon, 7/27/09, Tom Thorpe wrote: > From: Tom Thorpe > Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Problem with Event sort when the date is 13-14 Apr > 1930 > To: "L

Re: [LegacyUG] Problem with Event sort when the date is 13-14 Apr 1930

2009-07-27 Thread Dennis M . Kowallek
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:35:24 -0400, Dennis M. Kowallek wrote: >Legacy does not consider 13-14 Apr 1930 as a "valid" date. Slight correction ... it treats it as a range of dates, the first being 13, and the last being 14 Apr 1930. >If you ran the Potential problems Report it will probably get fl

Re: [LegacyUG] Problem with Event sort when the date is 13-14 Apr 1930

2009-07-27 Thread JRAYMOND651
Perhaps an easier solution would be to enter the earlier date in the date field and then in the source citation note the range of dates. This is what I do and it works for me. Jon Raymond St Paul Park, MN http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~raymond/ **A bad credi

Re: [LegacyUG] Problem with Event sort when the date is 13-14 Apr 1930

2009-07-27 Thread Dennis M . Kowallek
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 13:42:16 -0600, Arnold Sprague wrote: >I have five censuses for an individual for 1880, two for 1900, 1920, >and 1930. In the Individual's Information window, I manually sorted >them so that they are in chronological order. > >However, *after* I go to File/File Maintenance/C

RE: [LegacyUG] Problem with Event sort when the date is 13-14 Apr 1930

2009-07-27 Thread Tom Thorpe
Hi Ken, I admire your attention to detail. Since I cannot be certain on which date my family was ennumerated, I select the first of the two. Tom > Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 13:42:16 -0600 > From: aspra...@chicagobooth.edu > Subject: [LegacyUG] Problem with Event sort when th

Re: [LegacyUG] Problem with Event sort when the date is 13-14 Apr 1930

2009-07-27 Thread Steve Voght
The issue here is that technically "13-14 Apr 1930" is considered by the program to be the number 13 through the date 14 Apr 1930. If you change that date to "13 Apr 1930 - 14 Apr 1930" it will sort correctly (but not display as nicely in reports.) The same issue would arise even if you specify "13

[LegacyUG] Problem with Event sort when the date is 13-14 Apr 1930

2009-07-27 Thread Arnold Sprague
I have five censuses for an individual for 1880, two for 1900, 1920, and 1930. In the Individual's Information window, I manually sorted them so that they are in chronological order. However, *after* I go to File/File Maintenance/Check-Repair and put a check mark in Sort All Events by Date, th