Wynther did NOT apologise for what he said - it was inexcusably rude,
private or public.
How far does someone have to go, before he/she is taken off the List?
Mary Young
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Support/Jim Terry
wrote:
> Wynthner did apologize and I have contacted him off-list about the
GeoSci wrote:
This is a REAL problem. Warn the fools ONCE - then get rid of them!
Everyone trying to use the list pretty much feels the same way (I
believe!).
Not really. I've given up 'berating' people for not adhering to the
simple etiquette rules. The problem with kicking people off th
, 14 Jan 2009 13:19:27 -0700> From:
aspra...@chicagogsb.edu> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Rudeness to the list - I go
for excitement> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com> > Wynthner,> The
anger in your post(s) alerts us to either (1) > totally ignore all your posts
or (2) eage
.
btw- the appology is for sending it public- not for what was said.
--- On Wed, 1/14/09, Janis L Gilmore wrote:
> From: Janis L Gilmore
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Rudeness to the list
> To: "LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com"
> Date: Wednesday, January 14, 2009, 3:11 PM
He ONLY apologized for the fact that is was public and no for what he
said or his rudeness. I have seldom posted on here and been a member
since version 5 This is the very reason I seldom post. I don't care
if someone apologized for making it public or not it is still
unexcusable when he
It was excessively rude, public or private.
Art Seddon
- Original Message -
From: Wynthner
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 8:20 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Rudeness to the list
My appologies to the list. I meant to send that
Apology not accepted. And you should learn to spell!!!
- Original Message -
From: "Wynthner"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 10:20 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Rudeness to the list
My appologies to the list. I meant to send that private.
btw- the appology is for
;
>
> --- On Wed, 1/14/09, Janis L Gilmore wrote:
>
>> From: Janis L Gilmore
>> Subject: [LegacyUG] Rudeness to the list
>> To: "LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com"
>>
>> Date: Wednesday, January 14, 2009, 3:11 PM
>> The recent reply to subje
Wynthner did apologize and I have contacted him off-list about the problem.
My decision is to leave him on the list for now.
If you have questions about LUG policies, please visit
http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/Etiquette.asp.
Thank you for choosing Legacy,
Jim Terry
Technical Support
Leg
milytree.com
> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 10:20 AM
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Rudeness to the list
> I second (and third) Janis' comment.
>
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Janis L Gilmore
> wrote:
>>
>> The recent reply to subject "Apple," by a memb
I agree! As a new user of Legacy, and a subscriber to many other
lists, I find the rude behavior of some on this list to be totally
unacceptable.and so unnecessary. Why be mean and nasty when you
could just as easily be pleasant? I joined this list to find helpful
people that could
Clark
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 10:20 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Rudeness to the list
I second (and third) Janis' comment.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Janis L Gilmore
wrote:
The recent reply to subject "Apple,&qu
My appologies to the list. I meant to send that private.
btw- the appology is for sending it public- not for what was said.
--- On Wed, 1/14/09, Janis L Gilmore wrote:
> From: Janis L Gilmore
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Rudeness to the list
> To: "LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.c
I second (and third) Janis' comment.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Janis L Gilmore wrote:
> The recent reply to subject "Apple," by a member of this list surpassed
> common snippiness or rudeness, I think. I hope that the powers-that-be will
> address it in some manner.
>
> It is not conduci
Amen
- Original Message -
From: "Janis L Gilmore"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 9:11 AM
Subject: [LegacyUG] Rudeness to the list
The recent reply to subject ³Apple,² by a member of this list surpassed
common snippiness or rudeness, I think. I hope that the powe
The recent reply to subject ³Apple,² by a member of this list surpassed
common snippiness or rudeness, I think. I hope that the powers-that-be will
address it in some manner.
It is not conducive to an open discussion. I image there are lurkers that
are afraid to post at all.
Janis Walker Gilmore
16 matches
Mail list logo
