@LegacyFamilyTree.com
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 4:24 PM
Subject: [LegacyUG] Splitting vs Not
Again, I am just starting to use Legacy. I've
seen lots of messages over
the weekend about splitting sources vs not
splitting sources.
Can someone that does split sources (ie. 1820
Census may
to the present.
Janis Walker Gilmore
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cathy
Vallevieni
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 4:25 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Splitting vs Not
Again, I am just starting to use Legacy. I've
Cathy,
I have been an extreme splitter of census records (one source for each
household every year) but with source writer, am slowly combining to
one source for each county year. One of the best features in Legacy
is the ability to name your source so you can easily find it and still
have the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Linda McCauley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Splitting vs Not
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Date: Tuesday, July 8, 2008, 9:22 AM
Cathy,
I have been an extreme splitter of census records (one source for each
household every year) but with source
applicable to the present.
Janis Walker Gilmore
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cathy
Vallevieni
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 4:25 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Splitting vs Not
Again, I am just
Like Linda in the previous message, for Census records I think I am a
splitter i.e. one Master source for each household (location) for each
appropriate year.
My system is based on that each census return is a piece of data associated
to a location, with this in mind I record the location and
- Original Message - From: Cathy Vallevieni [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 4:24 PM
Subject: [LegacyUG] Splitting vs Not
Again, I am just starting to use Legacy. I've seen lots of
messages over the weekend about splitting sources vs
Again, I am just starting to use Legacy. I've seen lots of messages
over the weekend about splitting sources vs not splitting sources.
Can someone that does split sources (ie. 1820 Census may be listed
lots of times for each town in which you have an ancestor), please
tell me how they title
Source Names:
USA, IL, Cook, Chicago, 1930
UK, England, Nottingham, Bleasby 1881 Census
NRG, ST, Bynaset, Lovset 1900 Census
I split on city/township.
Note the Source List Name, which prints nowhere? can
have abbreviaations, but the Title, which prints on
most reports, should not have them. I then
I do not know whether this is splitting or lumping, but I have one
source for each township or city in each census. So I have a lot of
different census entries for 1920 Philadelphia, but I can put the detail
(roll number, page no, etc) each time I quote a different page. This
still gives me a
10 matches
Mail list logo
