Hi Dede,
The SW template I use for the "United States Obituary Collection" at
Ancestry.com is "Periodicals > Newspapers > Online database"
Dan
- Original Message -
From: Dede Holden
To: Legacy User Group
Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2009 6:41 AM
Subject: [LegacyUG] source temp
For any obituary I use the newspaper template for the source regardless of
where it was found. For those found on Ancestry, I merely add Ancestry as
the repository. And if I were to see a newspaper at a library, then the
library would be linked as the repository.
For me, Ancestry.com is merely
Dede Holden wrote
If anyone has used the "United States Obituary Collection" on Ancestry,
I'd like to know which Source Template you used.
I haven't actually used that Obit collection, but I have used another
online collection. At first I couldn't find a template that seemed
obviously design
t: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Template Surprise
Kirsten Bowman wrote:
>> Confessions of a sinner . . .
>>
>> I've been an advocate of a rather cavalier approach to use of
>> Legacy's source templates, primarily by putting data in any field
>> you wish (regar
Kirsten Bowman wrote:
Confessions of a sinner . . .
I've been an advocate of a rather cavalier approach to use of
Legacy's source templates, primarily by putting data in any field
you wish (regardless of field name) as long as the resulting
citation format is what you want. Now that's come back
This was included in the book, but never implemented yet. No discussion about
when it will work at present.
Rich in LA CA
--- On Tue, 8/11/09, Laura Taylor-Hanson wrote:
> From: Laura Taylor-Hanson
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Source template conversion tool
> To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.co
I should have mentioned ltools does a lot more than Source conversion
and customer support is excellent.
--
Richard Van Wasshnova
http://www.gencircles.com/users/vanwasshnova
http://gw.geneanet.org/vanwasshnova
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Arch
Laura,
I regret to tell you that this much awaited and much wanted function has yet to
be released, and there is no indication as to when, or indeed if, it will be.
Meanwhile in the User Guide rests this picture of the promised land, published,
no doubt, as a guide to the future
Ron Fergu
Legacy never completed a source conversion tool but a very nice one is
available from a 3rd party.
See:
http://zippersoftware.com/ltools/download.html
I have been using it on dozens of old style sources.
--
Richard Van Wasshnova
http://www.gencircles.com/users/vanwasshnova
http://gw.geneanet.org/
ide interesting
background reading about the life and times. My audience will have to go
find the book, if interested, or ask me for a copy.
Ward
- Original Message -
From: "Jenny M Benson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2008 3:59 PM
Subject: Re
time was limited and led to the wrong
assumptions.
Steve Overton
[LINK: http://www.overtonmedia.com/] www.overtonmedia.com
---Original Message---
From: Wynthner
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Template for Book Question
Sent: Nov 27 '08 23:56
I just have two questions for li
e rituals of ultra detailed sourcing is greatly overdone.
>
>
>
> --- On Thu, 11/27/08, Janis L Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> From: Janis L Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Template for Book Question
>> To: LegacyUs
e
From: Janis L Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2008 7:26:51 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Template for Book Question
I agree with Terri and Kirsten. Terri offered good examples of a sourced
book which was found on the
> Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 20:59:05 +
> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Template for Book Question
>
> Steve Voght wrote
>>The thing I don't like about the "Book, authored (reprint)> A
to use it unless
it's appropriate in that particular case.
Kirsten
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Steve Voght
Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2008 12:35 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Template fo
Steve Voght wrote
The thing I don't like about the "Book, authored (reprint) > Author
Known > Online Images" option mentioned previously is that the template
does not include a spot for the original publication information other
than year of original publication. To me, that's potentially as
g is greatly overdone.
>
>
>
> --- On Thu, 11/27/08, Janis L Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> From: Janis L Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Template for Book Question
>> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
&
The thing I don't like about the "Book, authored (reprint) > Author
Known > Online Images" option mentioned previously is that the
template does not include a spot for the original publication
information other than year of original publication. To me, that's
potentially as important to a future r
online version. The same sourcing process works for this. E.g., Books -->
Book, authored (reprint) --> Author known --> CD/DVD book (images).
Ward
- Original Message -
From: "Terri Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2008 9:14 PM
Sub
er
- Original Message
From: Wynthner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2008 12:56:00 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Template for Book Question
I just have two questions for list members...
Of all the people you have shared
te:
> From: Janis L Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Template for Book Question
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Date: Thursday, November 27, 2008, 12:26 PM
> I agree with Terri and Kirsten. Terri offered good examples
> of a sourced
From: Wynthner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2008 12:56:00 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Template for Book Question
I just have two questions for list members...
Of all the people you have shared your genealogy information how
more likely to check.
Elizabeth
researching the descendants of William and Sarah (Patterson) Thompson
- Original Message -
From: "Wynthner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2008 9:56 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Template for Book Question
I j
publish in a recognized
genealogical journal or produce a book for retail distribution that the arcane
rituals of ultra detailed sourcing is greatly overdone.
--- On Thu, 11/27/08, Janis L Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Janis L Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re:
I agree with Terri and Kirsten. Terri offered good examples of a sourced
book which was found on the internet (in the original question, it was
GoogleBooks). To Terri's citations, I would add an "accessed" date.
I continue to disagree with those who feel that "over-sourcing" is a bigger
problem th
- Original Message -
From: "Kay Fordham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2008 4:50 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Template for Book Question
Ron,
I generally work from family group sheets when doing research. When other
researchers request information
I use Books > Book, edited (reprint) > Editor known > Online book.
The footnote looks like this:
Lillian Drake Avery, editor, A Genealogy of the Ingersoll Family in America,
1629-1925: Comprising Descendants of Richard Ingersoll of Salem, Massachusetts,
John Ingersoll of Westfield, Mass., and J
Footnotes. I
will eventually be printing these reports.
Kay
- Original Message -
From: "ronald ferguson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2008 5:28 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Source Template for Book Question
Kay,
Repositories do print in Sources,
Message -
From: "Kirsten Bowman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2008 5:22 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Source Template for Book Question
Kay and Elizabeth:
This is really a semantics thing. The philosophy is that (1) Things on
the
Internet are cons
rGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2008 6:41:44 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Template for Book Question
Steve,
I have been using the "Book > Editor known > Basic Format" convention you
mention below for lack of anything better. Since the repository won't
om
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Template for Book Question
> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:41:44 -0800
>
> Steve,
>
> I have been using the "Book> Editor known> Basic Format" convention you
> mention below for lack of anything better. Since the repository
ROTECTED] Behalf Of Elizabeth
Richardson
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2008 3:34 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Template for Book Question
Why would it not be the format for any other book and the repository be
Google?
Elizabeth
researching the descend
d to print in the citation).
Thanks!
Kay
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Voght" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2008 4:23 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Template for Book Question
I ran into this same problem, and decided the best choice wa
I ran into this same problem, and decided the best choice was to
consider such books as "Book > Editor known > Basic Format" and
provide Google Books as the repository (if you don't use the
repository feature, then mention in the Text/Comments where you found
it.) The rationale being that you'
I ran into this same problem, and decided the best choice was to
consider such books as "Book > Editor known > Basic Format" and
provide Google Books as the repository (if you don't use the
repository feature, then mention in the Text/Comments where you found
it.) The rationale being that you're l
feedback.
Kay
- Original Message -
From: "Elizabeth Richardson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2008 3:34 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Template for Book Question
Why would it not be the format for any other book and the repository be
Google?
Elizabeth
Why would it not be the format for any other book and the repository be
Google?
Elizabeth
researching the descendants of William and Sarah (Patterson) Thompson
- Original Message -
From: "Kay Fordham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Legacy User Group"
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2008 2:22
ion is coming up over and over.
Juergen Amling
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jpadell
Comcast
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 8:47 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Template Conversion tool - I can
acy.
Jeff
- Original Message -
From: "Jenny M Benson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 3:02 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Template Conversion tool - I can't find it
Thomas Herson wrote
You can't help but be aware that the Source Conver
Thomas Herson wrote
You can't help but be aware that the Source Conversion Tool was a
primary reason many people "switched" to Legacy.
I don't think that can be so because unless one had Basic Style sources
from earlier versions of Legacy one would have no need of the Source
Conversion Tool!
ginal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas
Herson
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 6:20 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Template Conversion tool - I can't find it
Geoff,
You can't help but be aware
October 02, 2008 9:09 AM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Source Template Conversion tool - I can't find it
Jeff,
The 4th paragraph of the article at
http://legacynews.typepad.com/legacy_news/2008/08/legacy-family-t.html
gives
the official word on this.
Thanks,
Geoff Rasmussen
Millennia Corporation
[
Jeff,
The 4th paragraph of the article at
http://legacynews.typepad.com/legacy_news/2008/08/legacy-family-t.html gives
the official word on this.
Thanks,
Geoff Rasmussen
Millennia Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.LegacyFamilyTree.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[
Not yet in existence.
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 6:20 AM, jpadell Comcast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have the book for version 7 to use the conversion tool for sources it
> says to go Options and choose Source Template Conversion Tool. I don't see
> it anywhere.
>
> The closest I have come is fro
Message -
From: "Sherry/Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2008 9:47 AM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Source Template Conversion Tool?
This feature is still under development. We don't know how soon it will be
available.
Geoff Rasmussen posted his sugg
This feature is still under development. We don't know how soon it will be
available.
Geoff Rasmussen posted his suggestions on converting sources to the Legacy
User Group mailing list in June. You can read his post in the archives at
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.
Mike,
I'm an ex-TMG user myself. You're gonna love Legacy!
I find just showing the Citation Previews in the Add Source Detail screen
helps get
through the sourcing process. That in itself was worth the up-grade from V.
6 to 7.0.
It's SO much easier than TMG and as flexible as it needs to be. G
Thanks Jennifer and Keith,
That explains why I couldn't find it. I was beginning to think I was losing my
mind...
I've been a TMG user for a couple of years now, and although I have found it to
be an incredibly flexible program, I have been getting increasingly frustrated
with the micro-manag
Mike,
I've spoken with the support desk and other Legacy users, and it will not be
ready until a future update. In the meantime, I am converting my sources
without it. I think if you are a splitter vs. a lumper, the SourceWriter
Conversion Tool will not help much anyhow. I was a major splitter
"COMING SOON" - they thought they had it ready but.. SOON! Sorry!
Keith
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 12:10 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm a brand new user of Legacy 7. I have the deluxe edition installed, and
> I have been trying (unsuccessfully up to this point) to access the So
Juergen,
There is nothing to pick, because you are neither. The Source
Template Conversion Tool has not yet been released. Stay tuned and
look for it in a future build.
Glenn Woodman
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Juergen Amling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I must be blind or stupid (take
IL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 9:55 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Template Conversion Tool
Now I see the question. Tom asked about having the *Master Source
Definition* window open at the same time. I don't think you can do that
because there's no Add a N
Perhaps one of the Legacy tech people could get involved in this
question.
- Original Message - From: "Randolph Clark"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 8:16 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Template Conversion Tool
So long as the SourceWriter is the
ged into the new one.
--
From: "Dede Holden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 7:34 AM
To:
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Template Conversion Tool
Add the new source with the template.
Combine the old source with the new source. The new source will have
a bullet beside
JLB wrote
If you have the new Source Writer system turned on, and you open a
Master Source from either the Master Source List or an Assigned Sources
window you can then click the Add a new source button and it will bring
up the Source Writer window.
I don't think you mean *open* a Master Sou
- Original Message - From: "JLB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 8:03 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Template Conversion Tool
One at a time. Start a new source so there's a small box on top of
your
main screen for that and you can still see the ol
Yes, it does seem to matter which source is merged into the other one. The
old source needs to be merged into the new one.
--
From: "Dede Holden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 7:34 AM
To:
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG]
? Perhaps I'm doing something
>> wrong.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Tom
>>
>> - Original Message - From: "JLB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To:
>> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 8:03 PM
>> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Template
Add the new source with the template.
Combine the old source with the new source. The new source will have
a bullet beside it,indicating that it was generated with the Source
Template.
I don't think it matters which one you choose first when you are
combining. The progam recognizes the source cre
I understand what you're saying. Since I'm taking this very slowly, I
just pull out my original source document and use it for entering the
source using the Source Writer. I've found that sometimes I need
information that I did not include the first time I entered the source
anyway.
Dede
On Mon
rce Definition" window is open? Perhaps I'm doing something
wrong.
Thanks,
Tom
- Original Message - From: "JLB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 8:03 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Template Conversion Tool
One at a time. Start a new s
But I'm unable to split screens, i.e. viewing old and new sources
simultaneously.
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 9:40 AM, Jenny M Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> JD Liddil wrote
>>
>> In the mean time does nayone have suggetions on techniques to do this
>> conversion manually?
>
> As I think I have
JD Liddil wrote
In the mean time does nayone have suggetions on techniques to do this
conversion manually?
As I think I have mentioned elsewhere, I create a new Source to match
the old one, then merge the old into the new and adjust the Source
Details as necessary.
If yolu are a lumper, cr
JLB,
Can you tell me how to open the "Add a New Source" window while the "Master
Source Definition" window is open? Perhaps I'm doing something wrong.
Thanks,
Tom
- Original Message -
From: "JLB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, Jun
The good news is:
Once you've added the new version of your source, you can combine the
old source with the new one and Legacy keeps the new source. The
bullet beside the source in the Master Source list lets you know which
sources have been written with the new Source Writer. I've made the
chang
One at a time. Start a new source so there's a small box on top of your
main screen for that and you can still see the old source. Then either
re-type or copy and paste one section at a time from the old fields to
the new ones. Repeat x-hundred times. See you in about 5 years.
--
JL
JLog -
In the mean time does nayone have suggetions on techniques to do this
conversion manually?
JD
On 6/5/08, ronald ferguson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Bob,
>
> It's still work in progress - so not there as yet
>
>
> Ron Ferguson
>
> ___
Bob:
It is not available yet. Maybe in future updates.
Chap
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Bob Howes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am sure I am being incredibly dense, but I can't locate the Source
> Template Conversion Tool (in Master Source List > Options, according to the
> manual).
>
> I ha
According to the folks at Legacy it was not quite ready when they released
the product, but will be part of an update soon
... Sandy Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Howes
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 5:4
Bob,
It's still work in progress - so not there as yet
Ron Ferguson
_
New Blog: Free Contacts Database for use with Open Office
http://www.fergys.co.uk
View the Grimshaw Family Tree at:
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
For T
Not yet complete - they say a future development.
Keith
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Bob Howes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am sure I am being incredibly dense, but I can't locate the Source
> Template Conversion Tool (in Master Source List > Options, according to the
> manual).
>
> I have th
OTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 10:10 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Template Conversion Tool
Hi Guys
I've bought myself another new computer and I need to re-download Legacy 5
to the new
nks.
>
>
> Original Message-
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 10:10 AM
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Template Conversio
0:10 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Template Conversion Tool
Hi Guys
I've bought myself another new computer and I need to re-download Legacy 5
to the new computer. I have two questions. Where can I find my code /
password to unlock Legacy? How do I tra
Hi Guys
I've bought myself another new computer and I need to re-download Legacy 5
to the new computer. I have two questions. Where can I find my code /
password to unlock Legacy? How do I transfer my family files from one
compter to the other?
Hopefully, someone can answer these questions.
Ma
/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Template Conversion Tool
> D
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 9:42 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Template Conversion Tool
Because it is still under development. Some things prove harder in
practice than in thought and this, apparently, is one of them.
Cathy
At 09:28 PM 23/05/2008, you wrote:
I want t
Hadn't anyone on the Legacy staff tried this before publishing the manual?
- Original Message -
From: "Cathy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 9:42 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Template Conversion Tool
Because it is still under developme
Because it is still under development. Some things prove harder in
practice than in thought and this, apparently, is one of them.
Cathy
At 09:28 PM 23/05/2008, you wrote:
I want to use the Source Template Conversion Tool. On page 72 of the
Legacy User Guide it says:
"The Source Template Conv
Hi Jean,
The Chronology view can include General and Research Notes - they're
just not in chronological order.
Elizabeth is using the Standard edition that doesn't include the
Chronology View.
Cathy
At 12:05 AM 11/01/2007, you wrote:
Elizabeth,
Maybe I'm missing something but I think what
://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
> *Use Legacy Search - see My Blogs*
> Includes the family tree for Alan J Grimshaw
> http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/Grimshaw/
>
__
>
>
> -----
articular for each person. But you
don't need to do that once you are seeing everything in the chronology tab.
I don't think this is a deluxe feature, but not sure.
Jean
- Original Message -
From: "ewintr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 10,
/
__
> Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 21:36:38 -0800
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Source Template
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
>
> Thank you to all who have replied to my email.
>
> I guess having a lot of
Thank you to all who have replied to my email.
I guess having a lot of master sources isn't as big a
problem as I thought since some of you have many in
your legacy programs.
But I'd like to know a little more about the deluxe
version as mentioned in an email from Cathy (below).
The cost of the d
I am not sure why you are concerned with the quantity
of sources. For my 25K names, I have about 2500
sources. One source, in 13 volumes, has over 1K people
of mine found in it/them. For my census records, I
clump them by City/Year, and have no clue how many
[multiple countries]. You might consider
hat's my 2 bob's worth
Tom
- Original Message -
From: "Cathy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 12:23 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Source Template
Hi Elizabeth,
It does take a while to get your mind around the difference between Master
Hi Elizabeth,
It does take a while to get your mind around the difference between
Master Source and Source Detail
You can have one Master Source for your Cemetery (to use your example).
When you attach it to events for each person, you add their details
in the Source Detail. The Source Detai
/myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/Grimshaw/
__
> Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:56:36 -0800
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Source Template
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I've been reading through some archives and hav
> Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:56:36 -0800
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Source Template
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I've been reading through some archives and have not
> seen any answers to my 'pr
logs*
Includes the family tree for Alan J Grimshaw
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/Grimshaw/
__
> Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:56:36 -0800
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: R
Hello everyone,
I've been reading through some archives and have not
seen any answers to my 'problem' so far.
I hope I can explain this so it is understandable.
I need to find some way of creating Master Sources so
that I am not getting so many!! Up till now I have
been creating a new Master Sou
n Behalf Of
>Patricia WENZEL
>Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 12:46 PM
>To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
>Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Template
>
>I did this recently for several types of sources. I discovered that
>in order for it to work, I had to associate the
yUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Source Template
I for one replied and I saw a number of others!
Graham
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of M.
Brenzel
Sent: 07 January 2007 17:05
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [Legacy
ke changes
and save it as a new source.
Mary
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R G
Strong Genealogy
Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 1:09 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Template
Mary,
I believe t
, 2007 12:46 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Template
I did this recently for several types of sources. I discovered that
in order for it to work, I had to associate the template with a
person, so I created an unlinked individual and assigned all my
I for one replied and I saw a number of others!
Graham
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of M. Brenzel
Sent: 07 January 2007 17:05
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Source Template
I don't believe that I recei
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/Grimshaw/
__
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Source Template
> Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 12:0
Russ
- Original Message -
From: M. Brenzel
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 10:04 AM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Source Template
I don't believe that I received a response to this question so I am reposting
it. Please read from the bottom
enzel
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 4:38 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Source Template
This sounds like a great idea. However, how can I prevent this bogus
person from appearing in my webpages?
Mary
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[m
Thanks for pointing out the examples Nancy. They were just what I had
in mind.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nancy
Bender
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 1:23 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
