Hi to everyone who replied to my query on this.
Cycle through was not a good explanation sorry. Ron hit the nail on
the head and it is
Find next, had a little working to do as I use a mac but finally
managed to do it. Yeh
Thanks heaps everyone
Gwen
On 9/08/2010, at 10:26 PM, Ron Ferguson
Thanks for the replies and the help. I will go back to Gold Bug with
my questions. When I asked Gold Bug the same questions, I got this
reply from Tim Rosenlof and must have miss-interpreted what he meant.
I could answer those questions, but they should probably come from
them personally. I
Larry,
It's unfortunate that you quoted my off list reply. I thought personal
email was personal. It makes me not want to help. Now, in your public
post, you make it sound like I am Gold Bug or Work for Gold Bug. I
am not affiliated with them at all, nor claim to be.
Regards,
Tim Rosenlof
Could someone remind me how to do a search for a field that is not
blank. I would like to find all individuals who have any data in the
cause of death field. The * wildcard doesn't work, as it includes
blanks. The ? wildcard doesn't work either.
I thought l asked this before (and can't
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 10:23:55 -0400, Scott Hall seh0...@gmail.com
wrote:
Could someone remind me how to do a search for a field that is not
blank. I would like to find all individuals who have any data in the
cause of death field. The * wildcard doesn't work, as it includes
blanks. The ?
On 10/08/2010 15:23, Scott Hall wrote:
Could someone remind me how to do a search for a field that is not
blank. I would like to find all individuals who have any data in the
cause of death field.
Just use not equal to and leave the what field blank.
--
Jenny M Benson
Legacy User Group
Thank you. Both methods work.
Scott
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Jenny M Benson ge...@cedarbank.me.uk wrote:
On 10/08/2010 15:23, Scott Hall wrote:
Could someone remind me how to do a search for a field that is not
blank. I would like to find all individuals who have any data in the
Tim,
I apologize for replying to the list. I had contacted Gold Bug and
thought you were responding from Gold Bug. I am not trying to start a
fire-storm (God knows that's easy enough to do on this list), and
sorry that I mis-interpreted the email source.
Larry
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:04
Multiple marriages of some people are listed out of order in the Chronology
View. For Example someone's 1st wife may be listed as the 2nd wife and the
2nd wife as the 1st wife, etc. I have searched the help files, the Legacy
Family Tree manual, and the Legacy Archives for an solution to correcting
Thank you Ron, that worked.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: Ron Ferguson [mailto:ronfergy@tiscali.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 6:15 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Marriage order in Chronology View
Charles,
The order of spouses is as that
I am not sure exactly how to ask this question so I am going to give as
much info as possible.
I have been researching one town in Sicily for about 35+ years. I have
been transcribing all of the LDS filmed documents for that town for over
12 years now and have been slowly entering them into
I sent a message to the list Sunday and now it is Tuesday and I have not
heard anything. Am I on the list and just have no one interested in the
question? That's fine, just want to know if I am reaching the list. Thanks.
Emily in California
These were my questions, most answered by a call to
I've watched this happen now for the past month or two. I seem to get ALL
messages from the group EXCEPT for the original post by Ron Ferguson.
Obviously others are getting his because they are replying to his message.
Take for example the following.
-Original
Brian L. Lightfoot wrote:
I've watched this happen now for the past month or two. I seem to get
ALL messages from the group EXCEPT for the original post by Ron
Ferguson. Obviously others are getting his because they are replying
to his message. Take for example the
I believe I saw this post but didn't know the answers so deleted it; I think
it did reach the group but it's entirely possible that I am confusing
another post; there are so many posts some days. Kathy
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Emily Rosenberg dogpeo...@comcast.netwrote:
I sent a
Hi, I have two computers and wanted to transport all my genealogy information
from one to the other. Well, it worked for awhile, but when I tried to extract
the latest update to tree, it tells me the files are private and I need a
password. I have never privatized any of my files and
Darlene Don Hicks wrote:
Hi, I have two computers and wanted to transport all my genealogy
information from one to the other. Well, it worked for awhile, but
when I tried to extract the latest update to tree, it tells me the
files are private and I need a password. I have never privatized
Would someone running AniMap on Windows 7 please contact me offline as now
mine doesn't want to run stating things like File B not present and
Comaps.exe has stopped working (in other words, it crashes).
Thank you,
Lana
Legacy User Group guidelines:
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:49:19 -0500, Laura Johnson
rngad...@madisontelco.com wrote:
When I entered the Source Details, I entered them as follows:
Film #2014483, Document #57 or Film #1688171, Document #446
This is fine EXCEPT that most of the films contain documents from many
years (Film #2014483
Hi Emily,
I sent a message to the list Sunday and now it is Tuesday and I have
not heard anything. Am I on the list and just have no one interested
in the question? That’s fine, just want to know if I am reaching the list.
I'm sending this reply to both the list and to Emily directly to
Thanks Dennis. I know it is going to be a lot of work no matter which
way I go.
Dennis M. Kowallek wrote:
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:49:19 -0500, Laura Johnson
rngad...@madisontelco.com wrote:
When I entered the Source Details, I entered them as follows:
Film #2014483, Document #57 or Film
Emily,
I guess that you have not had much of a response, because you do not
actually say what you are trying to produce - so I will assume a report.
Basically Pictures attached to Sources or Vital Events will not be printed.
The only pictures to be selected are the first persons in the Picture
I'm sorry. As you have found, many of us leave unclear (to us) questions for
the impending re-ask. First which chart? Pedigree, or one created from the
Charting Program. If you want a person who has a photo attached, to not print
his/her spot on a report, then you have two choices (maybe
If you'll go to the AniMap website at www.Goldbug.com, you'll read:
AniMap is currently not compatible with 64-bit versions of Windows 7
or Vista. We are working diligently to resolve this issue and expect
to have a solution available by the end of August 2010. If you own
AniMap 3.0.2 we will
I am running AniMap 3.0 on my Windows 7 64 bit laptop. No problems I'm aware
of.
Dave
David L. Johnson
Happiness is a CHOICE
-Original Message-
From: Sherry/Support [mailto:she...@legacyfamilytree.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 9:05 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Thanks for taking time to write, everyone. I guess I needed to lurk a
while before posting and I could have been more effective. Emily in
California
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
Darlene,
You don't make it clear what you are having trouble extracting. Sounds
to me like the zipped multimedia files? If that is the case do you
have a 3rd party compression program installed such as securezip,
filzip or 7-zip? Some of them add password protection.
Also your signature is a bit
27 matches
Mail list logo
