Re: [LegacyUG] changing sentance wording

2016-09-02 Thread E. J. Childress via LegacyUserGroup
The original message to the list is in the attachment. This action is required because of the DMARC Reject/Quarantine Policy imposed by some email providers. Users who want to send messages without conversion to attachments should use a different email address for their subscription. Known provid

Re: [LegacyUG] miss labeling of individual

2016-09-02 Thread Cathy Pinner
Donna, Did you clear relationships before re-setting them? To make absolutely sure you could set them to someone completely different and then come back and set them to your normal person. Cathy Donna Newell wrote: Thanks for the input everyone. I am encouraged that someone else was able t

Re: [LegacyUG] miss labeling of individual

2016-09-02 Thread Donna Newell
Thanks for the input everyone. I am encouraged that someone else was able to duplicate my query. I ran relationships a number of ways and the problem persisted. I will go back to the name list and look at all my italic entries, but that won't catch the ones that I found the correct gender ide

Re: [LegacyUG] miss labeling of individual

2016-09-02 Thread Cathy Pinner
Everyone, Every now and again you have to re-run Tools - Set Relationships. That's just the way it is. A few relationships auto update as you add people but most don't. Cathy Brian Lightfoot wrote: More info. My unknown gender child described as a SON remained a SON even after I Set Relatio

Re: [LegacyUG] miss labeling of individual

2016-09-02 Thread Brian Lightfoot
More info. My unknown gender child described as a SON remained a SON even after I Set Relationships. Out of curiosity, I changed the gender to male. Description in Family View remained a Son. I reran Set Relationships and it remained a son. I then changed the child back to female and reran Set Re

Re: [LegacyUG] miss labeling of individual

2016-09-02 Thread Brian Lightfoot
I think you stumbled upon a slight bug...at least in my opinion. I started by adding an unknown gender child to myself. Strangely, Legacy shows the relationship to me as a SON as I view the unknown gender child. So that's the start of the bug. I then changed the gender from unknown to FEMALE. Tha

Re: [LegacyUG] miss labeling of individual

2016-09-02 Thread Martha Graham
Hi Donna, One of the things that Legacy used to do with unknown gender is to put the name in italics. I am not sure if Legacy 8 does it, but you might want to take a look at your index and see if there are any names in italics. Glad that you got it fixed though. Martha -- LegacyUserGroup

Re: [LegacyUG] miss labeling of individual

2016-09-02 Thread Donna Newell
Thanks everyone for the assistance. The radio button was listed as female. I had originally put her in as an unknown sex because I only knew the mother had x number of children and I didn't know the sex of two of them. I changed it to female when I found out the correct sex and the name. I tried

[LegacyUG] New Facebook Groups

2016-09-02 Thread Michele/Support
We now have a Facebook group page for our Danish users https://www.facebook.com/groups/198010627281215/ We also have a Facebook group page for our Dutch users https://www.facebook.com/groups/LegacyNederlands/ And here is the main Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/groups/Lega

Re: [LegacyUG] miss labeling of individual

2016-09-02 Thread Gene Young
In family view, is the radio button selected for male or female. If male, click on female radio button. On 9/2/2016 4:20 PM, Brian Kelly wrote: Have you recalculated the relationships? What build of Legacy are you using? I am using 8.0.0.556 and I Just recalculated relationships in my fil

Re: [LegacyUG] miss labeling of individual

2016-09-02 Thread Brian Kelly
Have you recalculated the relationships? What build of Legacy are you using? I am using 8.0.0.556 and I Just recalculated relationships in my file. My 2nd great Grand aunts are showing the correct term. Uncles are also correct. Brian Kelly On 02-Sep-16 1:45 PM, Donna Newell wrote: No I have

Re: [LegacyUG] miss labeling of individual

2016-09-02 Thread Bobby Johnson
This might be a place where "Check/Repair" is in order. Do a backup first. As Mike has indicated, run set relationships after you first do a clear relationships. Bobby > -Original Message- > From: LegacyUserGroup [mailto:legacyusergroup- > boun...@legacyusers.com] On Behalf Of MikeFry >

Re: [LegacyUG] miss labeling of individual

2016-09-02 Thread MikeFry
On 02 Sep 2016 16:10, Donna Newell wrote: I have in my data base a female that is supposed to be identified as 2^nd great-great aunt. Instead for some reason Legacy has chosen to label her as 2^nd great-great uncle. Does anyone have any ideas why? I am using Legacy 8 Deluxe Go through the p

Re: [LegacyUG] miss labeling of individual

2016-09-02 Thread Martha Graham
Hi Donna, Here is what Legacy has to say: [From the Legacy Help File] Changing Gender If you find that you need to change the gender of an individual, (if, for example you or someone else set it incorrectly when entering the individual) it is easy to do. The procedure, however, depends on the

Re: [LegacyUG] miss labeling of individual

2016-09-02 Thread Donna Newell
No I have her listed as a female, she is on the right side of the screen. If I knew how to get a screen shot I would send it. -Original Message- From: LegacyUserGroup [mailto:legacyusergroup-boun...@legacyusers.com] On Behalf Of Brian Kelly Sent: Friday, September 2, 2016 10:35 AM To: Lega

Re: [LegacyUG] miss labeling of individual

2016-09-02 Thread Brian Kelly
If she is not married you need to open her for edit and change the gender from M to F. if she is married then you have to use Edit > Swap husband and wife to change gender for both her and her spouse. After making the change you will have to recalculate the relationships. Brian Kelly On 02-Se

Re: [LegacyUG] miss labeling of individual

2016-09-02 Thread Crystal Emory
Is she marked a male? On Sep 2, 2016 10:11 AM, "Donna Newell" wrote: > I have in my data base a female that is supposed to be identified as 2nd > great-great aunt. Instead for some reason Legacy has chosen to label her > as 2nd great-great uncle. > > Does anyone have any ideas why? > > I am usi

Re: [LegacyUG] miss labeling of individual

2016-09-02 Thread Martha Graham
Hi Donna, When you look at the person in the 'family view' is she on the right side? If you inadvertently added her in on the left side, Legacy would automatically assume she was a male. If so, I think you can unlink her from the family as a son, then relink her as a daughter. Martha A Grah

[LegacyUG] miss labeling of individual

2016-09-02 Thread Donna Newell
I have in my data base a female that is supposed to be identified as 2nd great-great aunt. Instead for some reason Legacy has chosen to label her as 2nd great-great uncle. Does anyone have any ideas why? I am using Legacy 8 Deluxe Donna Newell Ardmore, OK -- LegacyUserGroup mailing lis

Re: [LegacyUG] [Legacy] FTM file to Legacy -can SKS act asintermediary, please

2016-09-02 Thread marion wimsett
I would like a "like" button I could hit! On 2 September 2016 at 10:17, Graham Lambert wrote: > Once again we may need to say, "You can't please all the people all the > time". I for one don't mind the side issues involved with our family > history programs and the operating systems we use t