What field do you think should be used for different spellings, if not AKA?
Thanks.
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Archived messages from old mail
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 10:52:27 -0500, Jerry jerrysemailgro...@gmail.com
wrote:
What field do you think should be used for different spellings, if not AKA?
I created a custom event called ... Alt. Spelling. ;-)
--
Dennis Kowallek (LTools/Custom Programming)
On 2012/01/13 18:01, Dennis M. Kowallek wrote:
What field do you think should be used for different spellings, if not AKA?
I created a custom event called ... Alt. Spelling.;-)
Nice idea! Except... to swapping an AKA with the Name fields.
--
Regards,
Mike Fry
Johannesburg
Legacy User Group
- CULLEENY was spelled
KULLING in a record I found just today) for a single person.
Cheers
Jan
-Original Message-
From: Dennis M. Kowallek [mailto:kowal...@iglou.com]
Sent: Saturday, 14 January 2012 03:01
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] AKAs
On Fri, 13 Jan
Sorry, I include married names, not alternate names in the index view.
Cheers
Jan
-Original Message-
From: Jan Roberts [mailto:poo...@ozemail.com.au]
Sent: Saturday, 14 January 2012 03:51
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] AKAs
Or you could just add a note
On 13/01/2012 15:52, Jerry wrote:
What field do you think should be used for different spellings, if not AKA?
Well, it's not so much a case of what field *should* be as what field
(if any) I or anyone else *chooses* to use! Personally, I don't use any
field as such.
Example. I have a family
Thanks - seems there are still so many grey areas - one could wish for
better standardization, but that would not make a lot of us happy if we
disagreed, so I guess we just continue doing what makes sense to
us. --Jerry
On 01/13/2012 12:31 PM, Jenny M Benson wrote:
On 13/01/2012 15:52,
to the lowering of standards to the lowest common denominator. Now for
a decent *British* pint!
Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/
-Original Message-
From: Jerry
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 6:49 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] AKAs
Thanks - seems
://www.fergys.co.uk/
-Original Message-
From: Jerry
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 6:49 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] AKAs
Thanks - seems there are still so many grey areas - one could wish for
better standardization, but that would not make a lot of us happy if we
/
-Original Message-
From: Jerry
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 6:49 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] AKAs
Thanks - seems there are still so many grey areas - one could wish for
better standardization, but that would not make a lot of us happy if we
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] AKAs
Thanks Ron. I agree with you (probably more than I disagree), but
without some standardization, where would we be? We could not even get
off first base, so there is a balance there. I just wish that the
definitions for AKA, nicknames, spelling
@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] AKAs
Thanks Ron. I agree with you (probably more than I disagree), but
without some standardization, where would we be? We could not even get
off first base, so there is a balance there. I just wish that the
definitions for AKA, nicknames, spelling variations
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] AKAs
Off-topic, I know, but may I ask your connection with the Norfolk-Howard
family, or is it just a research project?
Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/http://www.fergys.co.uk/
-Original Message-
From: CE Wood
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 8:16 PM
Many thanks. Just wondered, I’m not related to the families myself, but met the
late Duke on a few occasions.
Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/
From: CE WOOD
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 11:19 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] AKAs
Hi Ron,
Many tangential
14 matches
Mail list logo
