Thanks, Eliz!
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Eliz Hanebury wrote:
> Well one thing is to give Ethel a different father. After that in my
> family I didn't even try I chickened out and just put (may not be
> his) and may not be hers. Thankfully they were English so there
Well one thing is to give Ethel a different father. After that in my
family I didn't even try I chickened out and just put (may not be
his) and may not be hers. Thankfully they were English so there are
birth records
Eliz
Not Today and Not without a Fight
(Anon)
For all that has been, thanks.
I have a convoluted problem that I've tried to lay out below:
Problem 1. In Family View for George and Lidie:
a. Marriage info box correctly shows they did *not *marry
b. Ethel is correctly listed as their daughter
c. Clifford and Edward, the biological sons of Lidie and her first husband
On 30/12/2015 20:50, Priscilla Glasow wrote:
>
> Problem 1. In Family View for George and Lidie:
> a. Marriage info box correctly shows they did _not _marry
> b. Ethel is correctly listed as their daughter
> c. Clifford and Edward, the biological sons of Lidie and her first
> husband Charles.
4 matches
Mail list logo