Re: [LegacyUG] Assistance Please

2020-11-28 Thread Gene Young
I find it convenient to enter an unknown Female spouse as Given [[unknown]]  Surname [[husband's last name]].  They never show up on reports but indicate to me information that is missing and who it should be attached to. For an unknown Male I enter Given [[unknown]] Surname [[unknown]] for

Re: [LegacyUG] Assistance Please

2020-11-28 Thread Juergen Amling
What I enter into a name field where I don’t know the last, first or both names is an underscore (5x). Like that it shows up in reports with the underscore and people can write the missing name if they know them. Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 28, 2020, at 15:51, Jenny M Benson wrote: > > On

Re: [LegacyUG] Assistance Please

2020-11-28 Thread Jenny M Benson
On 28/11/2020 19:40, John Faulks wrote: FYI I have several instances like that with one known parent who later marries someone else. I agree that leaving the missing parent blank is the way to go. People may prefer not to use "Unknown" in place of a name, but I prefer to enter *something* to

Re: [LegacyUG] Assistance Please

2020-11-28 Thread John Faulks
Pete FYI I have several instances like that with one known parent who later marries someone else. I agree that leaving the missing parent blank is the way to go. Just be careful when the first parent joins a later partnership or marriage that the child is not included in that arrangement. I

Re: [LegacyUG] Assistance Please

2020-11-28 Thread Ms Mary K. Lund via LegacyUserGroup
Pete, I believe it is "best practices" in genealogy to avoid "unknown." You are certainly able to simply add the father and leave the mother blank - to be filled in later if that info becomes known.  Mary K. Lund On Saturday, November 28, 2020, 08:37:34 AM CST, pete.bea...@gmail.com

Re: [LegacyUG] Assistance Please

2020-11-28 Thread Pete Beatty
Great Thanks On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 10:18 AM Jenny M Benson wrote: > On 28/11/2020 14:36, pete.bea...@gmail.com wrote: > > I have uncovered a birth(abt 1750)in whichthe Mother is not identified. > > > > The Father is listed on aChurchrecord as the father. The motherisnot > > identified. > > >

Re: [LegacyUG] Assistance Please

2020-11-28 Thread Jenny M Benson
On 28/11/2020 14:36, pete.bea...@gmail.com wrote: I have uncovered a birth(abt 1750)in whichthe Mother is not identified. The Father is listed on aChurchrecord as the father.  The motherisnot identified. A couple of years later,the fatheris also listedonmarriagerecordalong with his newwife.

[LegacyUG] Assistance Please

2020-11-28 Thread pete.beatty
I have uncovered a birth (abt 1750) in which the Mother is not identified. The Father is listed on a Church record as the father. The mother is not identified. A couple of years later, the father is also listed on marriage record along with his new wife. Later I find a note that the married