Re: [LegacyUG] How best to record less common name formats into my Legacy program

2017-08-12 Thread Lin Sharp
> -- > *From:* LegacyUserGroup <legacyusergroup-boun...@legacyusers.com> on > behalf of Jenny M Benson <ge...@cedarbank.me.uk> > *Sent:* Thursday, August 10, 2017 2:53 PM > *To:* legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com > *Subject:* Re: [LegacyUG] How best to record less

Re: [LegacyUG] How best to record less common name formats into my Legacy program

2017-08-10 Thread CE WOOD
___ From: LegacyUserGroup <legacyusergroup-boun...@legacyusers.com> on behalf of Jenny M Benson <ge...@cedarbank.me.uk> Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 2:53 PM To: legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] How best to record less common name formats into my Legacy progr

Re: [LegacyUG] How best to record less common name formats into my Legacy program

2017-08-10 Thread Jane Linkswiler
oup@legacyusers.com> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] How best to record less common name formats into my Legacy program Fitz Alan meant he was the son of Alan. It had nothing whatsoever to do with legitimacy! Later, Fitz Allen became used as a surname and was used for daughters as well as sons.

Re: [LegacyUG] How best to record less common name formats into my Legacy program

2017-08-10 Thread Jenny M Benson
On 10-Aug-17 09:42 PM, CE WOOD wrote: Fitz Alan meant he was the son of Alan. It had nothing whatsoever to do with legitimacy! From Wikipedia: "From the Stuart era (1603–1714) and later, a pseudo-Anglo-Norman usage of Fitz was adopted for younger sons of the British royal family who lacked

Re: [LegacyUG] How best to record less common name formats into my Legacy program

2017-08-10 Thread Lin Sharp
s such as *Complete > Peerage*, *Domesday, Descendants*, *Domesday People*, *Europäische > Stammtafeln*, and Settipani's tomes, have been corrected as new documents > are being discovered all the time. > > > > > CE > > > -- > *From:* LegacyUserGr

Re: [LegacyUG] How best to record less common name formats into my Legacy program

2017-08-10 Thread CE WOOD
CE From: LegacyUserGroup <legacyusergroup-boun...@legacyusers.com> on behalf of Jenny M Benson <ge...@cedarbank.me.uk> Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 12:57 PM To: legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] How best to record less common name format

Re: [LegacyUG] How best to record less common name formats into my Legacy program

2017-08-10 Thread David Turley
I too have ancestors with uncommon names from that period. I have treated them as surnames and have not had any problems with them not being recognized on websites such as FamilySearch. As to the use of Fitz in a name, my sources do not indicate "illegitimate birth", rather simply "son of". On

Re: [LegacyUG] How best to record less common name formats into my Legacy program

2017-08-10 Thread Jenny M Benson
On 10-Aug-17 08:17 PM, Lin Sharp wrote: I am fortunate in having success in documenting some of my family lines back as far as the 13th century in what is now the UK. I would appreciate suggestions as to the best way to record those names in my Legacy program. Names such as the following are a