I posted a query about various 'Use Cases' for OSM data in regard to the new
licence on the 7th Feb. See archive here:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2008-February/000680.htm
l
I was concerned to see that the answers received were not conclusive and
that no response has
Peter Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2008-February/000680.html
I was concerned to see that the answers received were not conclusive and
that no response has been given by a qualified lawyer. With regard to the
brief for this licence
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Sent: 19 March 2008 3:00 PM
To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] License update
Hi,
Bully for you. What's in it for other participants? More abuse that
they can't give conclusive answers and aren't not qualified lawyers?
Well perhaps
Peter Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: MJ Ray [...]
Not *the* licence project. *That* licence project, making use cases
and testing things against them. I don't see how that connects to the
OSMF licence development work except at one point = it is a tangent.
I don't follow your
