Ulf Möller wrote:
Thinh Nguyen of Creative Commons has posted detailed comments on
the ODbL on the co-ment website.
Though I have a lot of time for CC in general, and agree with their general
stance that PD is the ideal way to go, I don't really find that a very
useful response.
I count 20
TimSC wrote:
The safe move move might be to use the latest date. Now based
on the Office of Public Service Information web page the copyright
year IS the year of first publication
My understanding is that this could refer to first publication of the
revised edition - in other words, take
Using the last date is the approach I take for the 1:25,000
provisional/first edition maps I'm collecting. Most don't have a copyright
date but luckily I have the excellent book on the 1:25,000 series written by
Peter Hellyer which confirms what year a particular map edition/print
edition appeared
