Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OSM data grant

2009-06-18 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Russ Nelson wrote: Yes, but your result has to be licensed under the CC-By-SA, which means that in principle, somebody could republish your composition. In practice, nobody has complained about that. Or rather, in practice, people simply haven't made the maps precisely because of this.

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OSM data grant

2009-06-18 Thread Andy Allan
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Russ Nelsonr...@cloudmade.com wrote: Yeah, I gotta admit that I'm wishing that we could protect the database as a database of geodata, whilst simultaneously allowing people to make derivative works that AREN'T a database of geodata, whilst also avoiding the

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OSM data grant

2009-06-18 Thread Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
Andy Allan wrote: Sent: 18 June 2009 6:29 PM To: Licensing and other legal discussions. Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OSM data grant On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Russ Nelsonr...@cloudmade.com wrote: Yeah, I gotta admit that I'm wishing that we could protect the database as a database of

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OSM data grant

2009-06-18 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Russ Nelson wrote: SteveC wrote: Andy Allan wrote: [...] Wow, I knew CloudMade had developed some really cool OSM-related products, but I had no idea a Fast Acting Synchronised Legal-Talk Trolling Squadron was one of them. :p cheers Richard -- View this message in context:

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OSM data grant

2009-06-18 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, Richard Fairhurst wrote: Russ Nelson wrote: SteveC wrote: Andy Allan wrote: [...] Wow, I knew CloudMade had developed some really cool OSM-related products, but I had no idea a Fast Acting Synchronised Legal-Talk Trolling Squadron was one of them. Come on, isn't it nice to have them