2010/4/19 Frederik Ramm :
> do we really want to require the 38th party down the line to still
> attribute OSM no matter how diluted the OSM content has become?
yes. Why should it have become diluted? If you give this up, you do
almost the same then releasing PD, and that's indeed what you are be
Hi,
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 19:43, Frederik Ramm wrote:
>> I am not bothered about individual contributions because everyone who
>> contributes *knows* what OSM is like and that he cannot expect to get
>> personal attribution. If someone however has released somet
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 19:43, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> I am not bothered about individual contributions because everyone who
> contributes *knows* what OSM is like and that he cannot expect to get
> personal attribution. If someone however has released something under
> CC-BY-SA without knowing OSM
Hi,
TimSC wrote:
> 1) Create a produced work under ODbL term 4.3 with proper attribution
> 2) Release produced work as public domain with proper attribution
> 3) Strip off legal notices and attribution (which I think is allowed,
> almost by definition, for public domain works)
> 4) Republish as p
TimSC wrote:
> The worst case scenario is the contributor terms cannot accept any
> data with an attribution condition. Hopefully that is not the case!
> Is that interpretation any way valid, interesting, cross eyed? If
> the answer is already out there, just link to it. Thanks!
http://lis
