Hi again, legal question this time,
This is mainly aimed at the LWG but others might have a view. I was
wondering, why isn't the PD declaration binding, according to the wiki page?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Why_would_I_want_my_contributions_to_be_public_domain
If you declare your
2010/7/20 andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com:
If you find a planet on a bus there's no contract you may be affected
by. There may be copyright, which may protect the content. If
there's nothing written on it then you basically have to assume All
rights reserved, provided there's any
Andy Allan wrote:
Never mind what Richard says
Always good advice. ;)
1) You can't actually put anything into the public domain in most
jurisdictions. [...]
2) There's clearly not enough legalese there for it to be effective :-)
The BSD licence is pretty short and to the best of my
Tim,
TimSC wrote:
I don't get that impression when I read the wiki. It says it is only a
statement and making this statement does not change what people can
do with your data. Looking at the wiki, those lines were written by
Frederik Ramm. I guess I'll ask him what he intended.
I would very
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Fun, isn't it?
No, the fun is when you tick that box, then potlatch reads that from
the API and disables the mapnik, opencyclemap and OS Opendata
backgrounds :-)
Cheers,
Andy
Hi,
Andy Allan wrote:
3) I can consider my edits public domain to my heart's content, but
if they are based on other people's non-PD edits, then they aren't
going to be fully PD.
I think in the wake of the license change we will have to develop a
number of very interesting metrics telling us
On 23/07/10 12:39, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
If you could magically get at the PD data without accessing it from the OSM
database (i.e. you asked the user for a local copy that they had saved on
their computer before uploading it to OSM), then the PD declaration on its
own would be sufficient.
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 7:37 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
2010/7/20 andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com:
If you find a planet on a bus there's no contract you may be affected
by. There may be copyright, which may protect the content. If
there's nothing written
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 4:36 AM, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
James Livingston li...@... writes:
The relevant question is then Is hosting a copy of ODbL licensed material
(e.g.
a planet dump) on your website without requiring people to agree to a
contract a
violation of the ODbL?.
I
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
If you find planet on a bus you are not finding just a pile of ordered
ones and zeros. It's on media of some type. You might sell the disk
as is, but copying the data and selling it would be legally risky. A
Reasonable
On 07/23/2010 02:02 PM, Anthony wrote:
I'm not sure anyone credible has claimed that [ODbL] is a free license. The
purpose of a free license is to grant permissions, not to impose
restrictions.
The purpose of a free licence is to protect people's freedom.
PD dedications and BSD licences
On 07/23/2010 04:56 PM, Anthony wrote:
Though, I'd say license is somewhat of a disingenuous term for
something which is actually an EULA.
Well, CC get to call CC0 not a licence. ;-)
I agree that the ODbL isn't just a licence, but I don't think it's any
more accurate to call it a EULA.
El día Friday 23 July 2010 15:02:19, Alex Protyagov dijo:
Would you please educate me on what legally should be done in order to
develop a commercial application that uses cached maps from
openstreetmap.org ?
You just have to comply with the CC-by-sa (and ODbL if you store the data in
2010/7/23 Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@sanchezortega.es
El día Friday 23 July 2010 15:02:19, Alex Protyagov dijo:
Would you please educate me on what legally should be done in order to
develop a commercial application that uses cached maps from
openstreetmap.org ?
You just have to comply
80n wrote:
El día Friday 23 July 2010 15:02:19, Alex Protyagov dijo:
Would you please educate me on what legally should be done in
order to
develop a commercial application that uses cached maps from
openstreetmap.org http://openstreetmap.org ?
You just have to
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010, Kai Krueger wrote:
snip
Enough of preamble, so here again I would like to ask the question again:
What is the criterion of when critical mass is reached and thus data is
lost (even if it isn't lost as data, it is lost to the project and the
(editing) community)? Who
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010, Kai Krueger wrote:
So far the the impressions I got from the members of the licensing group
vary from anywhere between e.g. 10% data loss is acceptable to as high as
90% data loss is acceptable (as long as a
On 24 July 2010 00:02, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010, Kai Krueger wrote:
So far the the impressions I got from the members of the licensing group
vary from anywhere between e.g. 10% data loss is
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 5:33 PM, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.comwrote:
On 23 July 2010 22:14, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010, Richard Weait wrote:
If you find planet on a bus you are not finding just a pile of ordered
ones and zeros. It's on media of some type. You
On Sat, 24 Jul 2010, Richard Weait wrote:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010, Kai Krueger wrote:
So far the the impressions I got from the members of the licensing group
vary from anywhere between e.g. 10% data loss is acceptable to as high
20 matches
Mail list logo
