Frederik Ramm frede...@... writes:
And of course we are using the same rules for taking and giving, or? Same
amounts of data we consider non-copyrightable and keep therefore in the
database can be taken out from the new ODbl-OSM database as if they were PD?
ODbL's concept if you take a lot of
Hi,
Richard Weait wrote:
Is there some OSM contribution or edit that is so mechanical and/or so
insignificant that it need never be considered for copyright or
database right?
Any edit made by a robot - e.g. one that fixes spelling mistakes -
certainly qualifies for never be considered for
On 14 October 2010 09:07, Francis Davey fjm...@gmail.com wrote:
I've not been following the detail of this discussion. One of my
worries is that a lot of things are said - maybe off-hand - that turn
into assumptions that feed into later discussion. Since this is an
area of law
On 10/14/2010 07:42 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
Richard Weait wrote:
Is there some OSM contribution or edit that is so mechanical and/or so
insignificant that it need never be considered for copyright or
database right?
Any edit made by a robot - e.g. one that fixes spelling mistakes -
