Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CT clarification: third-party sources

2010-12-15 Thread Robert Kaiser
Francis Davey schrieb: There seems (to me) to be nothing wrong in principle in holding a vote by email You mean other than emails being easily falsified and there's not even the slightest guarantee that a normal email is transmitted to the right recipient correctly. or indeed by any other

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CT clarification: third-party sources

2010-12-15 Thread Francis Davey
On 15 December 2010 19:06, Robert Kaiser ka...@kairo.at wrote: Francis Davey schrieb: There seems (to me) to be nothing wrong in principle in holding a vote by email You mean other than emails being easily falsified and there's not even the slightest guarantee that a normal email is