Thank for clarifying Anthony.
I apologize for the mistake. Not the best way to start posting in this
forum. I'm actually aware that the current license is CC-BY-SA 2.0 and this
was an unfortunate copy/paste mistake.
I do believe that my original questions still stand, as both licenses have a
Thanks for posting this Kai. Those comments from Creative Commons look
promising.
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Kai Krueger kakrue...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to link to a recent interesting article on the OSM licensing change
on LWN (Linux Weekly News) as I haven't seen it be mentioned
On 21/01/11 00:02, Kai Krueger wrote:
I'll try and paraphrase some of the main points and hope I don't
missrepresent anyone.
I am *very* glad that CC are now publicly acknowledging the harm that
Science Commons has caused.
I don't know how far CC can go with the 4.0 licences, but Mike's
Hi, João,
On Friday 21 January 2011 00:28:21 Joao Neto wrote:
I'm planning to develop an Android application that displays OpenStreetMap
POIs near you and complements the OSM data with data coming from other
sources (address, phone numbers, user notes, etc.).
What are the license
Kai Krueger kakrueger@... writes:
It also has a 60 entry long comment section. Although much is a rehash of
the the endless debates on OSMs own communication channels,
there are also a set of comments by user mlinksva from Creative Commons
(e.g. http://lwn.net/Articles/422754/) that seem to
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 7:38 AM, Andrew wynnd...@lavabit.com wrote:
I hope there is no turf war brewing between Creative Commons and Open Data
Commons.
I wouldn't know. On the other hand, Mike Linksvayer, from Creative
Commons, joined the License Working Group conference call on 18 Jan
2011.
I think there has been a bit of a crossed wire between 'scientific data' and
'anything which can be considered as data'. The position that scientific data
sets should be placed in the public domain seems reasonable (IMHO) but it is not
directly relevant to OSM because we are not a science
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Joao Neto joao.p.n...@gmail.com wrote:
Great points Anthony. Thanks for sharing!
To be honest I think the share-alike aspect of the license is too
restrictive and working against the project. The most successful projects in
the open source / community space
Hi Joao,
On 21 January 2011 16:32, Joao Neto joao.p.n...@gmail.com wrote:
Great points Anthony. Thanks for sharing!
To be honest I think the share-alike aspect of the license is too
restrictive and working against the project. The most successful projects in
the open source / community space
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
I think there has been a bit of a crossed wire between 'scientific data' and
'anything which can be considered as data'. The position that scientific data
sets should be placed in the public domain seems reasonable (IMHO) but
10 matches
Mail list logo
