+1 anyway
I just wanted to make clear that our current data
is submitted under CC-BY-SA (at least our community members declares so)
but there is absolutely no prove that the data submitted
can be CC-BY-SA.
I just want to say that copyright is not just something you
can declare or deny in
On 19 June 2011 19:55, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
g.grem...@cetest.nl wrote:
I just wanted to make clear that our current data
is submitted under CC-BY-SA (at least our community members declares so)
but there is absolutely no prove that the data submitted
can be CC-BY-SA.
On 18 June 2011 10:22, Francis Davey fjm...@gmail.com wrote:
OK. So what I mean by some of the questions don't make sense is
exactly this. I'm afraid you and lots of others who ask questions use
a lot of short-hand (lawyers sometimes do this too). The problem is
then I don't know what
On 19 June 2011 20:16, Robert Whittaker (OSM)
robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com wrote:
Thinking of the example someone gave or the copyright in sound
recordings being separate from the copyright in the music / lyrics,
I'm guessing the answer is some sort of combination of 2 and 3; along
the lines
On 18 June 2011 11:37, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 June 2011 20:35, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
Not sure of you point, since cc-by-sa can't be magically turned into
ODBL data, it can only stay cc-by-sa.
Oh and as for CTs, they don't guarantee attribution
On 19 June 2011 11:21, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 June 2011 20:16, Robert Whittaker (OSM)
robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com wrote:
Thinking of the example someone gave or the copyright in sound
recordings being separate from the copyright in the music / lyrics,
I'm
On 19 June 2011 20:24, Robert Whittaker (OSM)
robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 June 2011 11:37, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 June 2011 20:35, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
Not sure of you point, since cc-by-sa can't be magically turned into
ODBL
On 19 June 2011 20:31, Robert Whittaker (OSM)
robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com wrote:
While person C could indeed get access to the original data (which
must be offered by B), in the hypothetical situation I envisaged, they
choose not to do so. They obtain the produced work under PD/CC0 or
CC-By
On 19 June 2011 12:31, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 June 2011 20:24, Robert Whittaker (OSM)
robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 June 2011 11:37, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 June 2011 20:35, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
Not sure
On 19 June 2011 23:20, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com wrote:
I think what Robert is trying to say is that you only have to check
for compatibility with the current license. But the current license
is CC-By-SA, so CC-By-SA data would be okay.
Since things seem to be going head first
I forgot to ask, do SVG files constitute a produced work?
The kind OSM.org currently outputs as SVG maps.
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
On 20 June 2011 00:53, Rob Myers r...@robmyers.org wrote:
On 19 June 2011 12:31, John Smithdeltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
yet ODBL allows people to output PD tiles,
which don't offer attribution.
The ODbL requires attribution of the database.
The database can contain other attribution.
On 20 June 2011 00:55, Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote:
If however on the other hand if someone created an SVG file specially
for the purpose of extracted OSM data and tags, it would be extremely
difficult for them to argue that is a produced work and not a
database.
That's
- Original Message -
From: John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2011 11:33 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [talk-au] Statement from nearmap.com regarding
submission of derived works from
Hi,
David Groom wrote:
From reading section 4.6 of ODbL[1] my understanding is no. There is
no mention of it only applying if you change the data, the requirement
seems to hold whenever
You Publicly Use a Derivative Database or a Produced Work from a
Derivative Database,
However, the more
- Original Message -
From: Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2011 10:57 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] section 4.6 of ODbL was [talk-au] Statement
from nearmap.com regarding submission
16 matches
Mail list logo
