Hi,
last days we had a very emotional duscussion here at my university course if it
would be ok to protect any OSM generated works for copying by third users. We
had some opposide ideas if this is legally acceptable or not:
yes, you can apply additional copy protection, as:
-you don't limit
!i! wrote:
But to be hornest, we aren't legal experts, so it would be great to
get a statement of people that are more aware of all of the legal aspects.
1. You cannot apply extra conditions to the licence (CC-BY-SA 4a, as you
say).
2. Your website may have its own terms of use that restrict
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.netwrote:
3. CC-BY-SA indeed does not require that you publish the useful source
data.
(ODbL does.)
I honestly doubt that ODbL will achieve this. For example, if someone
decides to use some convoluted tagging system
On 25 November 2011 11:07, Nic Roets nro...@gmail.com wrote:
I will go even further and say this is already happening by people who have
already agreed to the ODbL. (Should I point out the examples that I know of
?)
From where we stand now, they are doing nothing wrong, since ODbL does
not
Thanks for this statement Richard :)
Have a nice weekend
Matthias
Am 25.11.2011 11:56, schrieb Richard Fairhurst:
!i! wrote:
But to be hornest, we aren't legal experts, so it would be great to
get a statement of people that are more aware of all of the legal aspects.
1. You cannot apply
On 25/11/11 11:07, Nic Roets wrote:
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Richard Fairhurst
rich...@systemed.net mailto:rich...@systemed.net wrote:
3. CC-BY-SA indeed does not require that you publish the useful
source data.
(ODbL does.)
I honestly doubt that ODbL will achieve
