+1
I'm interested on clarifying this one as well.
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Kate Chapman k...@maploser.com wrote:
Hi All,
Currently in Indonesia we are working on a QGIS plugin called InaSAFE.
The software allows someone to run an impact analysis of the effect of
a certain type of
Kate Chapman wrote:
So is the new dataset a derived database? It seems like it is to
me. What should we be licensing this?
CC-BY is pretty much compatible with ODbL: CC-BY only requires attribution
and ODbL provides that. There may be tiny differences of legalese but
nothing substantive. So
Am 28.11.2012 04:02, schrieb Kate Chapman:
So is the new dataset a derived database? It seems like it is to me.
If you combine both datasets to a new one, you've generated a derived
database. But this isn't a problem at all, because CC-BY-data can also
be licensed under ODbL.
Attribution
On 28/11/12 12:37, Kate Chapman wrote:
I don't believe that would apply to a derivative work, I think that
just applies to the work itself.
I'm interested to hear other interpretations though.
It's not particularly coherent given the obvious intent of the licence,
but I think the anti-TPM
So basically right now the hazard database is licensed CC-BY
Maybe different from the intent of the owner of the hazard database,
it won't be covered by CC-BY if the hazard database consist only of
fact datasets.
Though I don't know the exact legal interoperability between ODbL and CC-BY.
Shu
We've been using CC BY licensed data in OSM. The only potential issue is
that they be satisfied that the attribution is reasonable to the medium or
means You are utilizing.
I would consider that a line saying Hazard Data (C) CC BY foo, Map Data (C)
ODbL OpenStreetMap contributors with appropriate
