The way I read that 4th clause, it should be enough to add
*Contient des données reproduites, modifiées, traduites ou distribuées
« telles quelles » avec la permission de la Ville de Montréal.
**Ce produit contient des données accordées sous licence « telles quelles »
aux termes de l’accord de
Hi,
Just wondering what the current state of what we can do with the UK council
footpath open data is?
Generally I don't just copy the data into OSM anyway: it's more fun to survey
:-)
However I'm wondering whether we can do this?
1. Use the council data to verify whether a footpath surveyed
On 6 June 2013 08:11, Nick Whitelegg nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk wrote:
Just wondering what the current state of what we can do with the UK council
footpath open data is?
It will depend what data you are referring to. But the general rule
will apply: you can only use data/information that is
Hi Jerry,
On Thu, 6 Jun 2013 10:59:11 +0100, sk53.osm sk53@gmail.com
wrote:
...
One thing which concerns me is the 'private' release of Open Data. A
number of counties have given ProW data to persistent pesterers (not
meant perjoratively) apparently under a suitable license. I'd far
rather
More specifically, I got advice from le...@osmfoundation.org stating that the
licence was more restrictive than the ODbL, and thus could not be used as is.
I am quite unsure if I should cite the email I received from them, but I will
take the risk for the sake of the current discussion. I have
With two State of the Map conferences coming up now and plenty of
opportunities for face time, I'd like to restart our conversation around
clarifying the ODbL's implications for geocoding and get to a result. Over
here at MapBox we're hoping to use OpenStreetMap soon as much as possible
for
