[OSM-legal-talk] Information for officials and diplomats of countries and entities with disputed territories

2013-07-09 Thread Michael Collinson
Simon, Oliver, Dermot and I have give a finally look over the document and are happy to now send it to the board as our formal proposal. However, as Chair I would really prefer a formal quorate, 4, for such things and ask you to indicate yes or no by email before I send it.

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Information for officials and diplomats of countries and entities with disputed territories

2013-07-09 Thread Simon Poole
Sorry for missing the meeting got my times confused, It is a definite yes from me. There is a term in singular that should be plural I believe. But otherwise completely ok with me. Simon Am 09.07.2013 20:38, schrieb Michael Collinson: Simon, Oliver, Dermot and I have give a finally look over

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Information for officials and diplomats of countries and entities with disputed territories

2013-07-09 Thread Simon Poole
It seems as if we inadvertently CC's this to the public legal-talk list and not to the LWG one. Apologies to all. Simon Am 09.07.2013 21:56, schrieb Simon Poole: Sorry for missing the meeting got my times confused, It is a definite yes from me. There is a term in singular that should be

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Wikivoyage and licensing

2013-07-09 Thread Ian Sergeant
Hi, In relation to data WV - OSM. Typically, the project has not wanted to accept coords from Wikipedia, because many of them are derived from sources seen as incompatible with OSM. I see any existing WV coords as just another level of indirection. As far as adding WV users adding new POIs