On 28/12/15 01:23 PM, Mike Linksvayer wrote:
>
> Perhaps continued copyleft fragmentation is even in the (near term
> anyway) interest of OSM in order to encourage all others to use
> maximally permissive licenses.
This wouldn't help OSM due to the contributor agreement.
- Rob.
Indeed, CC-BY-SA-4.0 data at best would be as useful as ODbL data to
OSM under its current arrangements, ie not at all without agreement to
contributor terms.
Perhaps continued copyleft fragmentation is even in the (near term
anyway) interest of OSM in order to encourage all others to use
I would have to strongly agree with Robert. Matter of fact my position
is that we have in the past been too lenient in this respect and should
be much more strict going forward matching the growth of OSM and its
usage globally.
Unluckily the situation that IP law tends to be very territorial and
Am 28.12.2015 um 14:46 schrieb Simon Poole:
>
> that we other attribution in the contributor terms and on the other
>
That naturally should have been "that we offer attribution in the
contributor terms ..."
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
