See https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/
Am 06.02.2017 um 22:32 schrieb Simon Poole: > > > > On 06.02.2017 09:55, Erno Mäkinen wrote: >> Hi, >> >> For example, for the CC-BY 3.0 Unported license the ODbL >> Compatibility in the OSM wiki states that it "is ODbL compatible if >> rights holder(s) explicitly states in writing that credit on >> the Contributors >> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors> page is sufficient >> to fulfil attribution requirements including downstream use in works >> derived from OSM". > There is no licence compatibility page published by the OSMF. >> >> I am wondering, though "status of CC-BY 4.0 is still under >> consideration by the LWG", if the statement for the CC-BY 3.0 >> Unported license is still true for the CC-BY 4.0 International license. > The LWG is in the process of issuing guidance on CC BY 4.0 as the page > correctly states. It has not previously made any statement outside of > that it hasn't made a statement on the suitability of CC BY 4.0 as an > input licence for OSM. That is the current state of affairs. > > Simon > >> >> -- >> Erno Mäkinen >> Gispo Oy >> e...@gispo.fi <mailto:e...@gispo.fi> - GSM +358 50 505 7003 >> www.gispo.fi <http://www.gispo.fi/> - www.facebook.com/GispoFinland/ >> <https://www.facebook.com/GispoFinland/> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> legal-talk mailing list >> legal-talk@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk > > > > _______________________________________________ > legal-talk mailing list > legal-talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
