I've split this from the original thread before it derails the one it
was in any further, and cc'd legal-talk.
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:57, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
Ęvar Arnfjörš Bjarmason wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 13:05, James Livingston li...@sunsetutopia.com wrote:
On 14/07/2010, at 10:28 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
I'm no expert on this sort of thing, but there are probably a lot of
well known pitfalls to avoid when trying to run an inclusive
international project
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 21:36, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
On 14/05/10 21:19, Ęvar Arnfjörš Bjarmason wrote:
I've created a proposed version of the human readable contributor
terms on the wiki:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Database_License/Contributor_Terms/Human_readable
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 07:31, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
We *do* want to allow releasing produced works under PD. Note that we
are talking produced works here, not the data istself!
Maybe you do. Personally I'm pretty fond of the feature we have now
where I know that any map that
Apologies in advance if this is fanning the flames on the currently
ongoing license flamewar but I have a (hopefully) innocent query on
the matter.
Last year I asked what was the plan exactly for removing any CC-BY-SA
content left in the database after the now-scheduled changeover:
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Assuming for a moment that my contributions to OSM are copyrightable and
the CC-BY-SA license is valid, then if I license my data CC-BY-SA I have
the right to request anyone using my data, or building or using derived
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Greg Holloway
peanutzkingpeng...@hotmail.com wrote:
I hope i have picked the right list to ask these questions, please alow me
to explain myself;
I am a 4x4 off-roader and i have a laptop on the dash of my vehicle running
memory map. I have been searching the
2009/9/9 Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@sanchezortega.es:
OK, so it seems that they're using GMaps as the background, and OSM as the
actual street data provider. See:
http://chippy2005.googlepages.com/MonopolyCityStreets_1252505633167.png
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 7:47 PM, Peter Millarpeter.mil...@yahoo.com wrote:
I think that OSM is entitled to ask if the Creative Commons license has been
complied with.
The Monopoly City Streets game is produced by Tribal DDB which is part of
Hasbro Inc., one of the biggest toy manufacturers
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Ulf Mölleruse...@ulfm.de wrote:
Stefan Baebler schrieb:
the all data created by use of any tools which connect to
openstreetmap.org part can be problematic, as my browser connects to
openstreetmap.org. Heck, my computer and router also connect there,
and so
The text a new user gets when signing up is hte following:
(at http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/new )
By creating an account, you agree that all work uploaded to
openstreetmap.org and all data created by use of any tools which
connect to openstreetmap.org is to be (non-exclusively) licensed
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 5:42 PM, Gustav Foseid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well... If I am not mistaken, people closely involved with CC have argued
that OSM is in the public domain and only the graphical maps are creative
and covered by copyright. You might call that a transition strategy, if not
The ODbL FAQ[1] currently has two questions[2][3] that deal with the
planned removal of the CC-BY-SA licensed data that will still be left
in the OSM database after the switchover to ODbL is made and users
will be asked to opt to relicense their contributions under the new
license.
What I'd like
13 matches
Mail list logo
