: www.crosschasm.com
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
--
Martijn van Exel
skype: mvexel
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk
--
Martijn van Exel
From: Alex Barth a...@mapbox.com
Reply: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Date: August 7, 2014 at 11:11:31 AM
To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] YouTube videos
I've
of the Content.’
See the full terms here: https://www.youtube.com/static?template=terms
Note that YouTube users can also choose a CC-BY license - which should be
compatible with ODbL. But the default is the Standard YouTube License outlined
above.
Thanks -
--
Martijn van Exel
of a situation where I would be entitled to vote as a
Normal Member but not as an Associate Member?
See membership types here: http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Membership
Thanks,
--
Martijn van Exel
http://oegeo.wordpress.com/
http://openstreetmap.us
clearer in the definition part
of the guideline then, which now encapsulates both these use cases
stating the result of geocoding is 'one or more Geocodes. Geocodes
are then stored either permanently or temporarily [...]'.
--
Martijn van Exel
http://oegeo.wordpress.com/
http://openstreetmap.us
) does this mixed storage trigger
share alike in an of itself?
--
Martijn van Exel
http://oegeo.wordpress.com/
http://openstreetmap.us/
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
defined examples. I added a couple more to the list, sourced from
discussions we've been having at Telenav.
--
Martijn van Exel
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
is not in question here I think -
the data is not directly used to create new OSM data. Anyway, I should
probably ask over at legal-talk.
Martijn
--
martijn van exel
http://oegeo.wordpress.com
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http
Analyzer[1]. This could impact our relation with Bing (which, according to
the press, is just peachy).
[1] http://mvexel.dev.openstreetmap.org/bing/
--
martijn van exel
geospatial omnivore
1109 1st ave #2
salt lake city, ut 84103
801-550-5815
http://oegeo.wordpress.com
://forum.geonames.org/gforum/posts/list/262.page
martijn van exel
http://schaaltreinen.nl/
twitter / skype: mvexel
flickr: rhodes
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
Tim Waters wrote:
Then there's the nice issue of making a database from users
will not go down
well) we can have informal discussion afterwards.
Take care,
martijn van exel -+- mve...@gmail.com -+- http://www.schaaltreinen.nl/
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 01:24, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
Hi
We, the legal working group have been asked as a result of a chat
I believe we should. My initial thought was to focus on a discussion,
but thinking about it more I believe an introduction of sorts by
someone in the legal WG would make it more powerful.
martijn van exel -+- mve...@gmail.com -+- http://www.schaaltreinen.nl/
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 21:12
Hi,
Question 1 - is that what Ed said?
I believe that is in fact what he has said. It surprised me, because
it leaves a lot of room for debate, and thats why...
And question 2 - does it make sense,
legally?
...I think this could be dangerous waters in a legal sense. I have
been living
13 matches
Mail list logo
