On 04/20/2010 10:24 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> CC-BY-SA means that the receiver of my derived work can do what he
> pleases, and I must not use technical or contractual methods to keep him
> from it.
[...]
> It can hardly be wrong to advise the customer upfront of what I am going
take this thread off-list for
the moment. And I'd be happy to coordinate with you, Jonas, how we
proceed with them.
As the wiki-page Frederik mentioned
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lacking_proper_attribution
suggests I'll give it a second try to contact them.
Kind regards,
Stefa
On 02/11/2010 12:11 PM, James Livingston wrote:
> On 11/02/2010, at 8:14 PM, Stefan Neufeind wrote:
>> Agreed, trying to ask them would be a good thing. Has helped in some
>> cases in the past where authorities (city government or the like)
>> re-thought their license :-
On 02/11/2010 11:08 AM, Oliver Kuehn (skobbler) wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> you can use the data and display them on the OSM map but not import them
> into the OSM database itself.
>
> The license terms of the National Public Toilet Map dataset are not
> compliant with Create Commons Attribution-Sha
On 02/05/2010 12:31 PM, Chris Hill wrote:
> Jonas Stein wrote:
>> http://www.troiki.de/karte.jpg
>> http://www.troiki.de/anfahrt.html
>>
>> if so, should someone contact troiki and explain
>> how to use the osm maps correct.
>>
>>
> They don't have any attribution on the pages, otherwise is the
On 02/04/2010 09:15 PM, Rob Myers wrote:
> On 04/02/10 14:49, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>> AFAIK our current license offers our data for everyone who attributes
>> correctly, but I'd like to raise the issue of malicious use of our
>> data by governmental organisations. What do you thing about sett
t? Would
a more clear explanation on the alternatives and maybe an informal
"poll" (through a webtool) among contributors help find feelings of the
contributors and allow the Foundation to take a "wise" decision that is
best community-backed (or see if
