I have no intention of getting into a debate about whether ODBL is the
best licence for OSM data here. However, I do feel the need to correct
one very important factual point regarding the Contributor Terms.
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 06:20 +0200, Mike Dupont
jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
This
The people are not being asked to agree to a license in general, but
to give up an allow the board to tweak the license for them.
What is upsetting for me is that there is no porting process like with
creative commons, and any leverage one might have will be lost when
you agree to the CT.
OK, you
