Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Circumnavigating Share-Alike through software / now and future

2008-10-27 Thread Rob Myers
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:45 PM, Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you instead give the customer a heavily DRMed and encrypted version of your data, together with some decryption/processing software and with an OSM data file, and make it so that the PDF is generated on the customer's

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Circumnavigating Share-Alike through software / now and future

2008-10-27 Thread Nic Roets
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Rob Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BY-SA 2.0 section 3.d allows you to distribute copies or phonorecords of, display publicly, perform publicly, and perform publicly by means of a digital audio transmission Derivative Works

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Circumnavigating Share-Alike through software / now and future

2008-10-27 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, Nic Roets wrote: Unless local law explicitly allows you to create derivative works for your own use. You don't need local law; CC-BY-SA section 3 b. says that you are allowed to *create* derivative works in any case, and then goes on with restrictions (section 4) about distributing and

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Circumnavigating Share-Alike through software / now and future

2008-10-27 Thread Rob Myers
IANAL, TINLA. On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 2:54 PM, Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My example above did *not* contain distribution of any OSM-derived work. The items that were distributed were (a) proprietary software, (b) proprietary data, and (c) unaltered OSM data. (c) is distribution