On 26/11/11 23:43, Nic Roets wrote:
Rob, I'm not sure what you mean.
So I'm going to give a simple example. Suppose someone has a table with
museums and their capabilities. He then combines it with OSM to create a
map. If the capabilities is something opaque like type1 and type2,
then the
!i! wrote:
But to be hornest, we aren't legal experts, so it would be great to
get a statement of people that are more aware of all of the legal aspects.
1. You cannot apply extra conditions to the licence (CC-BY-SA 4a, as you
say).
2. Your website may have its own terms of use that restrict
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.netwrote:
3. CC-BY-SA indeed does not require that you publish the useful source
data.
(ODbL does.)
I honestly doubt that ODbL will achieve this. For example, if someone
decides to use some convoluted tagging system
On 25 November 2011 11:07, Nic Roets nro...@gmail.com wrote:
I will go even further and say this is already happening by people who have
already agreed to the ODbL. (Should I point out the examples that I know of
?)
From where we stand now, they are doing nothing wrong, since ODbL does
not
Thanks for this statement Richard :)
Have a nice weekend
Matthias
Am 25.11.2011 11:56, schrieb Richard Fairhurst:
!i! wrote:
But to be hornest, we aren't legal experts, so it would be great to
get a statement of people that are more aware of all of the legal aspects.
1. You cannot apply
On 25/11/11 11:07, Nic Roets wrote:
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Richard Fairhurst
rich...@systemed.net mailto:rich...@systemed.net wrote:
3. CC-BY-SA indeed does not require that you publish the useful
source data.
(ODbL does.)
I honestly doubt that ODbL will achieve
