Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Defining free and open (Re: CT clarification: third-party sources)

2010-12-12 Thread Rob Myers
On 11/12/10 17:27, Simon Ward wrote: On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 02:18:29PM +, Rob Myers wrote: Why leave it undefined? To allow it to be defined by the community. Which I suppose means that if the community could always say It's the OKD, stupid!. :-) Ok, well I guess I’m trying to say

[OSM-legal-talk] Defining free and open (Re: CT clarification: third-party sources)

2010-12-11 Thread Simon Ward
Rob, thank you, your answers to my barrage of questions were most helpful, and have showed me that I’m not completely off course in my thinking. On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 02:18:29PM +, Rob Myers wrote: Why leave it undefined? To allow it to be defined by the community. Which I suppose means